Clinical Results of Different Myocardial Protection Techniques in Aortic Stenosis

Background: Hypertrophied myocardium is especially vulnerable to ischemic injury. This study aimed to compare the early and late clinical outcomes of three different methods of myocardial protection in patients with aortic stenosis. Methods: This retrospective study included 225 consecutive patien...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jung Hee Lee, Dong Seop Jeong, Kiick Sung, Wook Sung Kim, Young Tak Lee, Pyo Won Park
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2015-06-01
Series:Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.kjtcvs.org/journal/download_pdf.php?doi=10.5090/kjtcs.2015.48.3.164
_version_ 1811228213159919616
author Jung Hee Lee
Dong Seop Jeong
Kiick Sung
Wook Sung Kim
Young Tak Lee
Pyo Won Park
author_facet Jung Hee Lee
Dong Seop Jeong
Kiick Sung
Wook Sung Kim
Young Tak Lee
Pyo Won Park
author_sort Jung Hee Lee
collection DOAJ
description Background: Hypertrophied myocardium is especially vulnerable to ischemic injury. This study aimed to compare the early and late clinical outcomes of three different methods of myocardial protection in patients with aortic stenosis. Methods: This retrospective study included 225 consecutive patients (mean age, 65±10 years; 123 males) with severe aortic stenosis who underwent aortic valve replacement. Patients were excluded if they had coronary artery disease, an ejection fraction <50%, more than mild aortic regurgitation, or endocarditis. The patients were divided into three groups: group A, which was treated with antegrade and retrograde cold blood cardioplegia; group B, which was treated with antegrade crystalloid cardioplegia using histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) solution; and group C, treated with retrograde cold blood cardioplegia. Results: Group A contained 70 patients (31.1%), group B contained 74 patients (32.9%), and group C contained 81 patients (36%). The three groups showed significant differences with regard to the proportion of patients with a New York Heart Association functional classification ≥III (p=0.035), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels (p=0.042), ejection fraction (p=0.035), left ventricular dimensions (p<0.001), left ventricular mass index (p<0.001), and right ventricular systolic pressure (p <0.001). Differences in cardiopulmonary bypass time (p=0.532) and aortic cross-clamp time (p=0.48) among the three groups were not statistically significant. During postoperative recovery, no significant differences were found regarding the use of inotropes (p=0.328), mechanical support (n=0), arrhythmias (atrial fibrillation, p=0.347; non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, p=0.1), and ventilator support time (p=0.162). No operative mortality occurred. Similarly, no significant differences were found in long-term outcomes. Conclusion: Although the three groups showed some significant differences with regard to patient characteristics, both antegrade crystalloid cardioplegia with HTK solution and retrograde cold blood cardioplegia led to early and late clinical results similar to those achieved with combined antegrade and retrograde cold blood cardioplegia.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T09:54:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8bef47cbcbde486b930fe1733f130268
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2233-601X
2093-6516
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T09:54:26Z
publishDate 2015-06-01
publisher Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
record_format Article
series Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
spelling doaj.art-8bef47cbcbde486b930fe1733f1302682022-12-22T03:37:45ZengKorean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeryKorean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery2233-601X2093-65162015-06-0148316417310.5090/kjtcs.2015.48.3.164Clinical Results of Different Myocardial Protection Techniques in Aortic StenosisJung Hee Lee0Dong Seop Jeong1Kiick Sung2Wook Sung Kim3Young Tak Lee4Pyo Won Park5Samsung Medical CenterSamsung Medical CenterSamsung Medical CenterSamsung Medical CenterSamsung Medical CenterSamsung Medical CenterBackground: Hypertrophied myocardium is especially vulnerable to ischemic injury. This study aimed to compare the early and late clinical outcomes of three different methods of myocardial protection in patients with aortic stenosis. Methods: This retrospective study included 225 consecutive patients (mean age, 65±10 years; 123 males) with severe aortic stenosis who underwent aortic valve replacement. Patients were excluded if they had coronary artery disease, an ejection fraction <50%, more than mild aortic regurgitation, or endocarditis. The patients were divided into three groups: group A, which was treated with antegrade and retrograde cold blood cardioplegia; group B, which was treated with antegrade crystalloid cardioplegia using histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) solution; and group C, treated with retrograde cold blood cardioplegia. Results: Group A contained 70 patients (31.1%), group B contained 74 patients (32.9%), and group C contained 81 patients (36%). The three groups showed significant differences with regard to the proportion of patients with a New York Heart Association functional classification ≥III (p=0.035), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels (p=0.042), ejection fraction (p=0.035), left ventricular dimensions (p<0.001), left ventricular mass index (p<0.001), and right ventricular systolic pressure (p <0.001). Differences in cardiopulmonary bypass time (p=0.532) and aortic cross-clamp time (p=0.48) among the three groups were not statistically significant. During postoperative recovery, no significant differences were found regarding the use of inotropes (p=0.328), mechanical support (n=0), arrhythmias (atrial fibrillation, p=0.347; non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, p=0.1), and ventilator support time (p=0.162). No operative mortality occurred. Similarly, no significant differences were found in long-term outcomes. Conclusion: Although the three groups showed some significant differences with regard to patient characteristics, both antegrade crystalloid cardioplegia with HTK solution and retrograde cold blood cardioplegia led to early and late clinical results similar to those achieved with combined antegrade and retrograde cold blood cardioplegia.http://www.kjtcvs.org/journal/download_pdf.php?doi=10.5090/kjtcs.2015.48.3.164Aortic valveReplacementMyocardial reperfusion injuryCardioplegic solutionsRetrograde
spellingShingle Jung Hee Lee
Dong Seop Jeong
Kiick Sung
Wook Sung Kim
Young Tak Lee
Pyo Won Park
Clinical Results of Different Myocardial Protection Techniques in Aortic Stenosis
Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Aortic valve
Replacement
Myocardial reperfusion injury
Cardioplegic solutions
Retrograde
title Clinical Results of Different Myocardial Protection Techniques in Aortic Stenosis
title_full Clinical Results of Different Myocardial Protection Techniques in Aortic Stenosis
title_fullStr Clinical Results of Different Myocardial Protection Techniques in Aortic Stenosis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Results of Different Myocardial Protection Techniques in Aortic Stenosis
title_short Clinical Results of Different Myocardial Protection Techniques in Aortic Stenosis
title_sort clinical results of different myocardial protection techniques in aortic stenosis
topic Aortic valve
Replacement
Myocardial reperfusion injury
Cardioplegic solutions
Retrograde
url http://www.kjtcvs.org/journal/download_pdf.php?doi=10.5090/kjtcs.2015.48.3.164
work_keys_str_mv AT jungheelee clinicalresultsofdifferentmyocardialprotectiontechniquesinaorticstenosis
AT dongseopjeong clinicalresultsofdifferentmyocardialprotectiontechniquesinaorticstenosis
AT kiicksung clinicalresultsofdifferentmyocardialprotectiontechniquesinaorticstenosis
AT wooksungkim clinicalresultsofdifferentmyocardialprotectiontechniquesinaorticstenosis
AT youngtaklee clinicalresultsofdifferentmyocardialprotectiontechniquesinaorticstenosis
AT pyowonpark clinicalresultsofdifferentmyocardialprotectiontechniquesinaorticstenosis