Philosophical Doubts about reality
There are many pragmatisms, and it is a little misleading to present this variegated trend of thought as if it were a monolithic doctrine. The founding fathers, too, were all but unanimous. Peirce was not in agreement with James on many issues. Dewey, in turn, did not like various aspects of both Pe...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Academicus
2023-07-01
|
| Series: | Academicus International Scientific Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
https://academicus.edu.al/nr28/Academicus-MMXXIII-28-219-223.pdf
|
| _version_ | 1797777008342597632 |
|---|---|
| author | Michele Marsonet |
| author_facet | Michele Marsonet |
| author_sort | Michele Marsonet |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | There are many pragmatisms, and it is a little misleading to present this variegated trend of thought as if it were a monolithic doctrine. The founding fathers, too, were all but unanimous. Peirce was not in agreement with James on many issues. Dewey, in turn, did not like various aspects of both Peirce’s and James’ philosophy, while C.I. Lewis’ views on logic were quite different from those held by Dewey. It should not be surprising, then, to find the same amount of disagreement in contemporary neo-pragmatism, where Rescher and Rorty, who both define themselves pragmatists, display different opinions on most subjects. I shall draw some comparisons between the ideas of these two thinkers. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T22:57:58Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-8bf7bfbc7c584871a84feeb8e6b9d37f |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2079-3715 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T22:57:58Z |
| publishDate | 2023-07-01 |
| publisher | Academicus |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Academicus International Scientific Journal |
| spelling | doaj.art-8bf7bfbc7c584871a84feeb8e6b9d37f2023-07-19T17:26:40ZengAcademicusAcademicus International Scientific Journal2079-37152023-07-01MMXXIII2821922310.7336/academicus.2023.28.13Philosophical Doubts about realityMichele MarsonetThere are many pragmatisms, and it is a little misleading to present this variegated trend of thought as if it were a monolithic doctrine. The founding fathers, too, were all but unanimous. Peirce was not in agreement with James on many issues. Dewey, in turn, did not like various aspects of both Peirce’s and James’ philosophy, while C.I. Lewis’ views on logic were quite different from those held by Dewey. It should not be surprising, then, to find the same amount of disagreement in contemporary neo-pragmatism, where Rescher and Rorty, who both define themselves pragmatists, display different opinions on most subjects. I shall draw some comparisons between the ideas of these two thinkers. https://academicus.edu.al/nr28/Academicus-MMXXIII-28-219-223.pdf metaphilosophyepistemologymetaphysicssciencerealism |
| spellingShingle | Michele Marsonet Philosophical Doubts about reality Academicus International Scientific Journal metaphilosophy epistemology metaphysics science realism |
| title | Philosophical Doubts about reality |
| title_full | Philosophical Doubts about reality |
| title_fullStr | Philosophical Doubts about reality |
| title_full_unstemmed | Philosophical Doubts about reality |
| title_short | Philosophical Doubts about reality |
| title_sort | philosophical doubts about reality |
| topic | metaphilosophy epistemology metaphysics science realism |
| url |
https://academicus.edu.al/nr28/Academicus-MMXXIII-28-219-223.pdf
|
| work_keys_str_mv | AT michelemarsonet philosophicaldoubtsaboutreality |