An Experimental Murine Model to Assess Biofilm Persistence on Commercial Breast Implant Surfaces
Capsular contracture is the most frequently associated complication following breast implant placement. Biofilm formation on the surface of such implants could significantly influence the pathogenesis of this complication. The objective of this study was to design an experimental model of breast imp...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-10-01
|
Series: | Microorganisms |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/10/10/2004 |
_version_ | 1797471080490729472 |
---|---|
author | Francisco Carmona-Torre Leire Fernández-Ciriza Carlos Berniz Cristina Gomez-Martinez de Lecea Ana Ramos Bernardo Hontanilla Jose L. del Pozo |
author_facet | Francisco Carmona-Torre Leire Fernández-Ciriza Carlos Berniz Cristina Gomez-Martinez de Lecea Ana Ramos Bernardo Hontanilla Jose L. del Pozo |
author_sort | Francisco Carmona-Torre |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Capsular contracture is the most frequently associated complication following breast implant placement. Biofilm formation on the surface of such implants could significantly influence the pathogenesis of this complication. The objective of this study was to design an experimental model of breast implant infection that allowed us to compare the in vivo <i>S. epidermidis</i> ability to form and perpetuate biofilms on commonly used types of breast implants (i.e., macrotexturized, microtexturized, and smooth). A biofilm forming <i>S. epidermidis</i> strain (ATCC 35984) was used for all experiments. Three different implant surface types were tested: McGhan BIOCELL<sup>®</sup> (i.e., macrotexturized); Mentor Siltex<sup>®</sup> (i.e., microtexturized); and Allergan Natrelle Smooth<sup>®</sup> (i.e., smooth). Two different infection scenarios were simulated. The ability to form biofilm on capsules and implants over time was evaluated by quantitative post-sonication culture of implants and capsules biopsies. This experimental model allows the generation of a subclinical staphylococcal infection associated with a breast implant placed in the subcutaneous tissue of Wistar rats. The probability of generating an infection was different according to the type of implant studied and to the time from implantation to implant removal. Infection was achieved in 88.9% of macrotextured implants (i.e., McGhan), 37.0% of microtexturized implants (i.e., Mentor), and 18.5% of smooth implants (i.e., Allergan Smooth) in the short-term (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Infection was achieved in 47.2% of macrotextured implants, 2.8% of microtexturized implants, and 2.8% of smooth implants (i.e., Allergan Smooth) in the long-term (<i>p</i> < 0.001). There was a clear positive correlation between biofilm formation on any type of implant and capsule colonization/infection. Uniformly, the capsules formed around the macro- or microtexturized implants were consistently macroscopically thicker than those formed around the smooth implants regardless of the time at which they were removed (i.e., 1–2 weeks or 3–5 weeks). We have shown that there is a difference in the ability of <i>S epidermidis</i> to develop in vivo biofilms on macrotextured, microtextured, and smooth implants. Smooth implants clearly thwart bacterial adherence and, consequently, biofilm formation and persistence are hindered. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T19:44:32Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-8bf7e8662e494c2e95144dce8978e660 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2076-2607 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T19:44:32Z |
publishDate | 2022-10-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Microorganisms |
spelling | doaj.art-8bf7e8662e494c2e95144dce8978e6602023-11-24T01:26:51ZengMDPI AGMicroorganisms2076-26072022-10-011010200410.3390/microorganisms10102004An Experimental Murine Model to Assess Biofilm Persistence on Commercial Breast Implant SurfacesFrancisco Carmona-Torre0Leire Fernández-Ciriza1Carlos Berniz2Cristina Gomez-Martinez de Lecea3Ana Ramos4Bernardo Hontanilla5Jose L. del Pozo6Infectious Diseases Division, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, SpainMicrobiology Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, SpainDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, SpainDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, SpainMicrobiology Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, SpainIdiSNA, Navarra Institute for Health Research, 31008 Pamplona, SpainInfectious Diseases Division, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, SpainCapsular contracture is the most frequently associated complication following breast implant placement. Biofilm formation on the surface of such implants could significantly influence the pathogenesis of this complication. The objective of this study was to design an experimental model of breast implant infection that allowed us to compare the in vivo <i>S. epidermidis</i> ability to form and perpetuate biofilms on commonly used types of breast implants (i.e., macrotexturized, microtexturized, and smooth). A biofilm forming <i>S. epidermidis</i> strain (ATCC 35984) was used for all experiments. Three different implant surface types were tested: McGhan BIOCELL<sup>®</sup> (i.e., macrotexturized); Mentor Siltex<sup>®</sup> (i.e., microtexturized); and Allergan Natrelle Smooth<sup>®</sup> (i.e., smooth). Two different infection scenarios were simulated. The ability to form biofilm on capsules and implants over time was evaluated by quantitative post-sonication culture of implants and capsules biopsies. This experimental model allows the generation of a subclinical staphylococcal infection associated with a breast implant placed in the subcutaneous tissue of Wistar rats. The probability of generating an infection was different according to the type of implant studied and to the time from implantation to implant removal. Infection was achieved in 88.9% of macrotextured implants (i.e., McGhan), 37.0% of microtexturized implants (i.e., Mentor), and 18.5% of smooth implants (i.e., Allergan Smooth) in the short-term (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Infection was achieved in 47.2% of macrotextured implants, 2.8% of microtexturized implants, and 2.8% of smooth implants (i.e., Allergan Smooth) in the long-term (<i>p</i> < 0.001). There was a clear positive correlation between biofilm formation on any type of implant and capsule colonization/infection. Uniformly, the capsules formed around the macro- or microtexturized implants were consistently macroscopically thicker than those formed around the smooth implants regardless of the time at which they were removed (i.e., 1–2 weeks or 3–5 weeks). We have shown that there is a difference in the ability of <i>S epidermidis</i> to develop in vivo biofilms on macrotextured, microtextured, and smooth implants. Smooth implants clearly thwart bacterial adherence and, consequently, biofilm formation and persistence are hindered.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/10/10/2004breastimplantbiofilmpathogenesisstaphylococcalWistar rat |
spellingShingle | Francisco Carmona-Torre Leire Fernández-Ciriza Carlos Berniz Cristina Gomez-Martinez de Lecea Ana Ramos Bernardo Hontanilla Jose L. del Pozo An Experimental Murine Model to Assess Biofilm Persistence on Commercial Breast Implant Surfaces Microorganisms breast implant biofilm pathogenesis staphylococcal Wistar rat |
title | An Experimental Murine Model to Assess Biofilm Persistence on Commercial Breast Implant Surfaces |
title_full | An Experimental Murine Model to Assess Biofilm Persistence on Commercial Breast Implant Surfaces |
title_fullStr | An Experimental Murine Model to Assess Biofilm Persistence on Commercial Breast Implant Surfaces |
title_full_unstemmed | An Experimental Murine Model to Assess Biofilm Persistence on Commercial Breast Implant Surfaces |
title_short | An Experimental Murine Model to Assess Biofilm Persistence on Commercial Breast Implant Surfaces |
title_sort | experimental murine model to assess biofilm persistence on commercial breast implant surfaces |
topic | breast implant biofilm pathogenesis staphylococcal Wistar rat |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/10/10/2004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT franciscocarmonatorre anexperimentalmurinemodeltoassessbiofilmpersistenceoncommercialbreastimplantsurfaces AT leirefernandezciriza anexperimentalmurinemodeltoassessbiofilmpersistenceoncommercialbreastimplantsurfaces AT carlosberniz anexperimentalmurinemodeltoassessbiofilmpersistenceoncommercialbreastimplantsurfaces AT cristinagomezmartinezdelecea anexperimentalmurinemodeltoassessbiofilmpersistenceoncommercialbreastimplantsurfaces AT anaramos anexperimentalmurinemodeltoassessbiofilmpersistenceoncommercialbreastimplantsurfaces AT bernardohontanilla anexperimentalmurinemodeltoassessbiofilmpersistenceoncommercialbreastimplantsurfaces AT joseldelpozo anexperimentalmurinemodeltoassessbiofilmpersistenceoncommercialbreastimplantsurfaces AT franciscocarmonatorre experimentalmurinemodeltoassessbiofilmpersistenceoncommercialbreastimplantsurfaces AT leirefernandezciriza experimentalmurinemodeltoassessbiofilmpersistenceoncommercialbreastimplantsurfaces AT carlosberniz experimentalmurinemodeltoassessbiofilmpersistenceoncommercialbreastimplantsurfaces AT cristinagomezmartinezdelecea experimentalmurinemodeltoassessbiofilmpersistenceoncommercialbreastimplantsurfaces AT anaramos experimentalmurinemodeltoassessbiofilmpersistenceoncommercialbreastimplantsurfaces AT bernardohontanilla experimentalmurinemodeltoassessbiofilmpersistenceoncommercialbreastimplantsurfaces AT joseldelpozo experimentalmurinemodeltoassessbiofilmpersistenceoncommercialbreastimplantsurfaces |