An Experimental Murine Model to Assess Biofilm Persistence on Commercial Breast Implant Surfaces

Capsular contracture is the most frequently associated complication following breast implant placement. Biofilm formation on the surface of such implants could significantly influence the pathogenesis of this complication. The objective of this study was to design an experimental model of breast imp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Francisco Carmona-Torre, Leire Fernández-Ciriza, Carlos Berniz, Cristina Gomez-Martinez de Lecea, Ana Ramos, Bernardo Hontanilla, Jose L. del Pozo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-10-01
Series:Microorganisms
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/10/10/2004
_version_ 1797471080490729472
author Francisco Carmona-Torre
Leire Fernández-Ciriza
Carlos Berniz
Cristina Gomez-Martinez de Lecea
Ana Ramos
Bernardo Hontanilla
Jose L. del Pozo
author_facet Francisco Carmona-Torre
Leire Fernández-Ciriza
Carlos Berniz
Cristina Gomez-Martinez de Lecea
Ana Ramos
Bernardo Hontanilla
Jose L. del Pozo
author_sort Francisco Carmona-Torre
collection DOAJ
description Capsular contracture is the most frequently associated complication following breast implant placement. Biofilm formation on the surface of such implants could significantly influence the pathogenesis of this complication. The objective of this study was to design an experimental model of breast implant infection that allowed us to compare the in vivo <i>S. epidermidis</i> ability to form and perpetuate biofilms on commonly used types of breast implants (i.e., macrotexturized, microtexturized, and smooth). A biofilm forming <i>S. epidermidis</i> strain (ATCC 35984) was used for all experiments. Three different implant surface types were tested: McGhan BIOCELL<sup>®</sup> (i.e., macrotexturized); Mentor Siltex<sup>®</sup> (i.e., microtexturized); and Allergan Natrelle Smooth<sup>®</sup> (i.e., smooth). Two different infection scenarios were simulated. The ability to form biofilm on capsules and implants over time was evaluated by quantitative post-sonication culture of implants and capsules biopsies. This experimental model allows the generation of a subclinical staphylococcal infection associated with a breast implant placed in the subcutaneous tissue of Wistar rats. The probability of generating an infection was different according to the type of implant studied and to the time from implantation to implant removal. Infection was achieved in 88.9% of macrotextured implants (i.e., McGhan), 37.0% of microtexturized implants (i.e., Mentor), and 18.5% of smooth implants (i.e., Allergan Smooth) in the short-term (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Infection was achieved in 47.2% of macrotextured implants, 2.8% of microtexturized implants, and 2.8% of smooth implants (i.e., Allergan Smooth) in the long-term (<i>p</i> < 0.001). There was a clear positive correlation between biofilm formation on any type of implant and capsule colonization/infection. Uniformly, the capsules formed around the macro- or microtexturized implants were consistently macroscopically thicker than those formed around the smooth implants regardless of the time at which they were removed (i.e., 1–2 weeks or 3–5 weeks). We have shown that there is a difference in the ability of <i>S epidermidis</i> to develop in vivo biofilms on macrotextured, microtextured, and smooth implants. Smooth implants clearly thwart bacterial adherence and, consequently, biofilm formation and persistence are hindered.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T19:44:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8bf7e8662e494c2e95144dce8978e660
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2607
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T19:44:32Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Microorganisms
spelling doaj.art-8bf7e8662e494c2e95144dce8978e6602023-11-24T01:26:51ZengMDPI AGMicroorganisms2076-26072022-10-011010200410.3390/microorganisms10102004An Experimental Murine Model to Assess Biofilm Persistence on Commercial Breast Implant SurfacesFrancisco Carmona-Torre0Leire Fernández-Ciriza1Carlos Berniz2Cristina Gomez-Martinez de Lecea3Ana Ramos4Bernardo Hontanilla5Jose L. del Pozo6Infectious Diseases Division, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, SpainMicrobiology Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, SpainDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, SpainDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, SpainMicrobiology Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, SpainIdiSNA, Navarra Institute for Health Research, 31008 Pamplona, SpainInfectious Diseases Division, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, SpainCapsular contracture is the most frequently associated complication following breast implant placement. Biofilm formation on the surface of such implants could significantly influence the pathogenesis of this complication. The objective of this study was to design an experimental model of breast implant infection that allowed us to compare the in vivo <i>S. epidermidis</i> ability to form and perpetuate biofilms on commonly used types of breast implants (i.e., macrotexturized, microtexturized, and smooth). A biofilm forming <i>S. epidermidis</i> strain (ATCC 35984) was used for all experiments. Three different implant surface types were tested: McGhan BIOCELL<sup>®</sup> (i.e., macrotexturized); Mentor Siltex<sup>®</sup> (i.e., microtexturized); and Allergan Natrelle Smooth<sup>®</sup> (i.e., smooth). Two different infection scenarios were simulated. The ability to form biofilm on capsules and implants over time was evaluated by quantitative post-sonication culture of implants and capsules biopsies. This experimental model allows the generation of a subclinical staphylococcal infection associated with a breast implant placed in the subcutaneous tissue of Wistar rats. The probability of generating an infection was different according to the type of implant studied and to the time from implantation to implant removal. Infection was achieved in 88.9% of macrotextured implants (i.e., McGhan), 37.0% of microtexturized implants (i.e., Mentor), and 18.5% of smooth implants (i.e., Allergan Smooth) in the short-term (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Infection was achieved in 47.2% of macrotextured implants, 2.8% of microtexturized implants, and 2.8% of smooth implants (i.e., Allergan Smooth) in the long-term (<i>p</i> < 0.001). There was a clear positive correlation between biofilm formation on any type of implant and capsule colonization/infection. Uniformly, the capsules formed around the macro- or microtexturized implants were consistently macroscopically thicker than those formed around the smooth implants regardless of the time at which they were removed (i.e., 1–2 weeks or 3–5 weeks). We have shown that there is a difference in the ability of <i>S epidermidis</i> to develop in vivo biofilms on macrotextured, microtextured, and smooth implants. Smooth implants clearly thwart bacterial adherence and, consequently, biofilm formation and persistence are hindered.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/10/10/2004breastimplantbiofilmpathogenesisstaphylococcalWistar rat
spellingShingle Francisco Carmona-Torre
Leire Fernández-Ciriza
Carlos Berniz
Cristina Gomez-Martinez de Lecea
Ana Ramos
Bernardo Hontanilla
Jose L. del Pozo
An Experimental Murine Model to Assess Biofilm Persistence on Commercial Breast Implant Surfaces
Microorganisms
breast
implant
biofilm
pathogenesis
staphylococcal
Wistar rat
title An Experimental Murine Model to Assess Biofilm Persistence on Commercial Breast Implant Surfaces
title_full An Experimental Murine Model to Assess Biofilm Persistence on Commercial Breast Implant Surfaces
title_fullStr An Experimental Murine Model to Assess Biofilm Persistence on Commercial Breast Implant Surfaces
title_full_unstemmed An Experimental Murine Model to Assess Biofilm Persistence on Commercial Breast Implant Surfaces
title_short An Experimental Murine Model to Assess Biofilm Persistence on Commercial Breast Implant Surfaces
title_sort experimental murine model to assess biofilm persistence on commercial breast implant surfaces
topic breast
implant
biofilm
pathogenesis
staphylococcal
Wistar rat
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/10/10/2004
work_keys_str_mv AT franciscocarmonatorre anexperimentalmurinemodeltoassessbiofilmpersistenceoncommercialbreastimplantsurfaces
AT leirefernandezciriza anexperimentalmurinemodeltoassessbiofilmpersistenceoncommercialbreastimplantsurfaces
AT carlosberniz anexperimentalmurinemodeltoassessbiofilmpersistenceoncommercialbreastimplantsurfaces
AT cristinagomezmartinezdelecea anexperimentalmurinemodeltoassessbiofilmpersistenceoncommercialbreastimplantsurfaces
AT anaramos anexperimentalmurinemodeltoassessbiofilmpersistenceoncommercialbreastimplantsurfaces
AT bernardohontanilla anexperimentalmurinemodeltoassessbiofilmpersistenceoncommercialbreastimplantsurfaces
AT joseldelpozo anexperimentalmurinemodeltoassessbiofilmpersistenceoncommercialbreastimplantsurfaces
AT franciscocarmonatorre experimentalmurinemodeltoassessbiofilmpersistenceoncommercialbreastimplantsurfaces
AT leirefernandezciriza experimentalmurinemodeltoassessbiofilmpersistenceoncommercialbreastimplantsurfaces
AT carlosberniz experimentalmurinemodeltoassessbiofilmpersistenceoncommercialbreastimplantsurfaces
AT cristinagomezmartinezdelecea experimentalmurinemodeltoassessbiofilmpersistenceoncommercialbreastimplantsurfaces
AT anaramos experimentalmurinemodeltoassessbiofilmpersistenceoncommercialbreastimplantsurfaces
AT bernardohontanilla experimentalmurinemodeltoassessbiofilmpersistenceoncommercialbreastimplantsurfaces
AT joseldelpozo experimentalmurinemodeltoassessbiofilmpersistenceoncommercialbreastimplantsurfaces