A survey across orbital lymphoma in Poland: Multicenter retrospective study of polish lymphoma research group (PLRG)

Abstract Objective To investigate the prevalence of histopathological subtypes, the clinical stage at presentation and treatment modalities in Polish patients with orbital lymphoma (OL) and to determine prognostic outcomes. Methods The retrospective study of 107 patients with OL treated in a 14‐year...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elżbieta Kalicińska, Agnieszka Giza, Jan Maciej Zaucha, Sebastian Giebel, Dagmara Zimowska‐Curyło, Iga Andrasiak, Wojciech Spychałowicz, Jerzy Wojnar, Andrzej Balcerzak, Joanna Romejko‐Jarosińska, Ewa Paszkiewicz‐Kozik, Wanda Knopińska‐Posłuszny, Justyna Rybka, Paula Jabłonowska, Tomasz Wróbel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-02-01
Series:Cancer Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5223
_version_ 1797903108544659456
author Elżbieta Kalicińska
Agnieszka Giza
Jan Maciej Zaucha
Sebastian Giebel
Dagmara Zimowska‐Curyło
Iga Andrasiak
Wojciech Spychałowicz
Jerzy Wojnar
Andrzej Balcerzak
Joanna Romejko‐Jarosińska
Ewa Paszkiewicz‐Kozik
Wanda Knopińska‐Posłuszny
Justyna Rybka
Paula Jabłonowska
Tomasz Wróbel
author_facet Elżbieta Kalicińska
Agnieszka Giza
Jan Maciej Zaucha
Sebastian Giebel
Dagmara Zimowska‐Curyło
Iga Andrasiak
Wojciech Spychałowicz
Jerzy Wojnar
Andrzej Balcerzak
Joanna Romejko‐Jarosińska
Ewa Paszkiewicz‐Kozik
Wanda Knopińska‐Posłuszny
Justyna Rybka
Paula Jabłonowska
Tomasz Wróbel
author_sort Elżbieta Kalicińska
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective To investigate the prevalence of histopathological subtypes, the clinical stage at presentation and treatment modalities in Polish patients with orbital lymphoma (OL) and to determine prognostic outcomes. Methods The retrospective study of 107 patients with OL treated in a 14‐year period in Polish hematological centers. The analysis included histopathological subtype, disease clinical advancement, treatment modalities, progression‐free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results The median patient age was 60 years (range 51–71). Mucosa‐associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma accounted for slightly more than half of all cases of orbital lymphoma (51%). The second most common subtype was diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (29%). Primary orbital lymphoma was diagnosed in 48% of all patients. According to the Ann Arbor, localized stage IE of orbital lymphoma was diagnosed only in 39% of all patients. Systemic involvement was observed in more than half of all patients (52%). The median follow‐up period was 30 months (range 0–160 months). Patients with non‐MALT lymphoma had a significantly inferior PFS compared to patients with MALT lymphoma, (p = 0.047). Patients with primary orbital lymphoma had a superior PFS compared to patients with secondary orbital lymphoma [median PFS 104.5 months vs. 33.4 months], (p = 0.069). Younger patients with MALT lymphoma were characterized by superior PFS (median PFS not reached) compared to other studied subgroups of patients (older patients with MALT lymphoma, younger and older non‐MALT lymphoma patients) with a median PFS of 30.5, 32.2, 32.6 months respectively (p = 0.039). Patients treated with chemotherapy alone had inferior PFS compared to patients treated with combined therapies (p = 0.034). The median PFS across patients who received chemotherapy alone was 23.7 months, whereas across other patients was 73.9 months. Conclusions Secondary lymphoma accounts for more than half of the orbital lymphoma in Polish population. The advanced clinical stage of the disease (non‐IE according to Ann Arbor) concerns two‐thirds of the overall population of patients with orbital lymphomas and one‐third of MALT lymphoma patients. The high incidence of advanced stages of orbital lymphoma may indicate the need for combined treatment. Combined orbital lymphoma treatment is associated with superior PFS compared to chemotherapy alone in overall population of patients with orbital lymphoma.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T09:27:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8bfcff17849f4c5cb3b258376f77adc4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-7634
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T09:27:46Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cancer Medicine
spelling doaj.art-8bfcff17849f4c5cb3b258376f77adc42023-02-19T18:54:07ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342023-02-011233036304510.1002/cam4.5223A survey across orbital lymphoma in Poland: Multicenter retrospective study of polish lymphoma research group (PLRG)Elżbieta Kalicińska0Agnieszka Giza1Jan Maciej Zaucha2Sebastian Giebel3Dagmara Zimowska‐Curyło4Iga Andrasiak5Wojciech Spychałowicz6Jerzy Wojnar7Andrzej Balcerzak8Joanna Romejko‐Jarosińska9Ewa Paszkiewicz‐Kozik10Wanda Knopińska‐Posłuszny11Justyna Rybka12Paula Jabłonowska13Tomasz Wróbel14Department of Hematology, Blood Neoplasms and Bone Marrow Transplantation Wrocław Medical University Wrocław PolandDepartment of Hematology Jagiellonian University Medical College Kraków PolandDepartment of Hematology and Transplantology Medical University of Gdańsk Gdańsk PolandDepartment of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Oncohematology Maria Sklodowska‐Curie National Research Institute of Oncology Gliwice PolandDepartment of Hematology Jagiellonian University Medical College Kraków PolandIndependent Researcher Wrocław PolandDepartment of Internal Medicine and Oncology Silesian Medical University Katowice PolandDepartment of Internal Medicine and Oncology Silesian Medical University Katowice PolandDepartment of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Poznan University of Medical Science Poznań PolandMaria Sklodowska‐Curie National Research Institute of Oncology Warsaw PolandMaria Sklodowska‐Curie National Research Institute of Oncology Warsaw PolandDepartment of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Maritime Hospital Gdynia PolandDepartment of Hematology, Blood Neoplasms and Bone Marrow Transplantation Wrocław Medical University Wrocław PolandDepartment of Hematology, Blood Neoplasms and Bone Marrow Transplantation Wrocław Medical University Wrocław PolandDepartment of Hematology, Blood Neoplasms and Bone Marrow Transplantation Wrocław Medical University Wrocław PolandAbstract Objective To investigate the prevalence of histopathological subtypes, the clinical stage at presentation and treatment modalities in Polish patients with orbital lymphoma (OL) and to determine prognostic outcomes. Methods The retrospective study of 107 patients with OL treated in a 14‐year period in Polish hematological centers. The analysis included histopathological subtype, disease clinical advancement, treatment modalities, progression‐free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results The median patient age was 60 years (range 51–71). Mucosa‐associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma accounted for slightly more than half of all cases of orbital lymphoma (51%). The second most common subtype was diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (29%). Primary orbital lymphoma was diagnosed in 48% of all patients. According to the Ann Arbor, localized stage IE of orbital lymphoma was diagnosed only in 39% of all patients. Systemic involvement was observed in more than half of all patients (52%). The median follow‐up period was 30 months (range 0–160 months). Patients with non‐MALT lymphoma had a significantly inferior PFS compared to patients with MALT lymphoma, (p = 0.047). Patients with primary orbital lymphoma had a superior PFS compared to patients with secondary orbital lymphoma [median PFS 104.5 months vs. 33.4 months], (p = 0.069). Younger patients with MALT lymphoma were characterized by superior PFS (median PFS not reached) compared to other studied subgroups of patients (older patients with MALT lymphoma, younger and older non‐MALT lymphoma patients) with a median PFS of 30.5, 32.2, 32.6 months respectively (p = 0.039). Patients treated with chemotherapy alone had inferior PFS compared to patients treated with combined therapies (p = 0.034). The median PFS across patients who received chemotherapy alone was 23.7 months, whereas across other patients was 73.9 months. Conclusions Secondary lymphoma accounts for more than half of the orbital lymphoma in Polish population. The advanced clinical stage of the disease (non‐IE according to Ann Arbor) concerns two‐thirds of the overall population of patients with orbital lymphomas and one‐third of MALT lymphoma patients. The high incidence of advanced stages of orbital lymphoma may indicate the need for combined treatment. Combined orbital lymphoma treatment is associated with superior PFS compared to chemotherapy alone in overall population of patients with orbital lymphoma.https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5223head and neck cancerMALTOcular adnexal lymphomaprognosis
spellingShingle Elżbieta Kalicińska
Agnieszka Giza
Jan Maciej Zaucha
Sebastian Giebel
Dagmara Zimowska‐Curyło
Iga Andrasiak
Wojciech Spychałowicz
Jerzy Wojnar
Andrzej Balcerzak
Joanna Romejko‐Jarosińska
Ewa Paszkiewicz‐Kozik
Wanda Knopińska‐Posłuszny
Justyna Rybka
Paula Jabłonowska
Tomasz Wróbel
A survey across orbital lymphoma in Poland: Multicenter retrospective study of polish lymphoma research group (PLRG)
Cancer Medicine
head and neck cancer
MALT
Ocular adnexal lymphoma
prognosis
title A survey across orbital lymphoma in Poland: Multicenter retrospective study of polish lymphoma research group (PLRG)
title_full A survey across orbital lymphoma in Poland: Multicenter retrospective study of polish lymphoma research group (PLRG)
title_fullStr A survey across orbital lymphoma in Poland: Multicenter retrospective study of polish lymphoma research group (PLRG)
title_full_unstemmed A survey across orbital lymphoma in Poland: Multicenter retrospective study of polish lymphoma research group (PLRG)
title_short A survey across orbital lymphoma in Poland: Multicenter retrospective study of polish lymphoma research group (PLRG)
title_sort survey across orbital lymphoma in poland multicenter retrospective study of polish lymphoma research group plrg
topic head and neck cancer
MALT
Ocular adnexal lymphoma
prognosis
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5223
work_keys_str_mv AT elzbietakalicinska asurveyacrossorbitallymphomainpolandmulticenterretrospectivestudyofpolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg
AT agnieszkagiza asurveyacrossorbitallymphomainpolandmulticenterretrospectivestudyofpolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg
AT janmaciejzaucha asurveyacrossorbitallymphomainpolandmulticenterretrospectivestudyofpolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg
AT sebastiangiebel asurveyacrossorbitallymphomainpolandmulticenterretrospectivestudyofpolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg
AT dagmarazimowskacuryło asurveyacrossorbitallymphomainpolandmulticenterretrospectivestudyofpolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg
AT igaandrasiak asurveyacrossorbitallymphomainpolandmulticenterretrospectivestudyofpolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg
AT wojciechspychałowicz asurveyacrossorbitallymphomainpolandmulticenterretrospectivestudyofpolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg
AT jerzywojnar asurveyacrossorbitallymphomainpolandmulticenterretrospectivestudyofpolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg
AT andrzejbalcerzak asurveyacrossorbitallymphomainpolandmulticenterretrospectivestudyofpolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg
AT joannaromejkojarosinska asurveyacrossorbitallymphomainpolandmulticenterretrospectivestudyofpolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg
AT ewapaszkiewiczkozik asurveyacrossorbitallymphomainpolandmulticenterretrospectivestudyofpolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg
AT wandaknopinskaposłuszny asurveyacrossorbitallymphomainpolandmulticenterretrospectivestudyofpolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg
AT justynarybka asurveyacrossorbitallymphomainpolandmulticenterretrospectivestudyofpolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg
AT paulajabłonowska asurveyacrossorbitallymphomainpolandmulticenterretrospectivestudyofpolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg
AT tomaszwrobel asurveyacrossorbitallymphomainpolandmulticenterretrospectivestudyofpolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg
AT elzbietakalicinska surveyacrossorbitallymphomainpolandmulticenterretrospectivestudyofpolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg
AT agnieszkagiza surveyacrossorbitallymphomainpolandmulticenterretrospectivestudyofpolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg
AT janmaciejzaucha surveyacrossorbitallymphomainpolandmulticenterretrospectivestudyofpolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg
AT sebastiangiebel surveyacrossorbitallymphomainpolandmulticenterretrospectivestudyofpolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg
AT dagmarazimowskacuryło surveyacrossorbitallymphomainpolandmulticenterretrospectivestudyofpolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg
AT igaandrasiak surveyacrossorbitallymphomainpolandmulticenterretrospectivestudyofpolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg
AT wojciechspychałowicz surveyacrossorbitallymphomainpolandmulticenterretrospectivestudyofpolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg
AT jerzywojnar surveyacrossorbitallymphomainpolandmulticenterretrospectivestudyofpolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg
AT andrzejbalcerzak surveyacrossorbitallymphomainpolandmulticenterretrospectivestudyofpolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg
AT joannaromejkojarosinska surveyacrossorbitallymphomainpolandmulticenterretrospectivestudyofpolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg
AT ewapaszkiewiczkozik surveyacrossorbitallymphomainpolandmulticenterretrospectivestudyofpolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg
AT wandaknopinskaposłuszny surveyacrossorbitallymphomainpolandmulticenterretrospectivestudyofpolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg
AT justynarybka surveyacrossorbitallymphomainpolandmulticenterretrospectivestudyofpolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg
AT paulajabłonowska surveyacrossorbitallymphomainpolandmulticenterretrospectivestudyofpolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg
AT tomaszwrobel surveyacrossorbitallymphomainpolandmulticenterretrospectivestudyofpolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg