Biomechanical analysis of single-level interbody fusion with different internal fixation rod materials: a finite element analysis

Abstract Background Lumbar spinal fusion with rigid spinal fixators as one of the high risk factors related to adjacent-segment failure. The purpose of this study is to investigate how the material properties of spinal fixation rods influence the biomechanical behavior at the instrumented and adjace...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yueh-Ying Hsieh, Fon-Yih Tsuang, Yi-Jie Kuo, Chia-Hsien Chen, Chang-Jung Chiang, Chun-Li Lin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-02-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3111-1
_version_ 1811271170361655296
author Yueh-Ying Hsieh
Fon-Yih Tsuang
Yi-Jie Kuo
Chia-Hsien Chen
Chang-Jung Chiang
Chun-Li Lin
author_facet Yueh-Ying Hsieh
Fon-Yih Tsuang
Yi-Jie Kuo
Chia-Hsien Chen
Chang-Jung Chiang
Chun-Li Lin
author_sort Yueh-Ying Hsieh
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Lumbar spinal fusion with rigid spinal fixators as one of the high risk factors related to adjacent-segment failure. The purpose of this study is to investigate how the material properties of spinal fixation rods influence the biomechanical behavior at the instrumented and adjacent levels through the use of the finite element method. Methods Five finite element models were constructed in our study to simulate the human spine pre- and post-surgery. For the four post-surgical models, the spines were implanted with rods made of three different materials: (i) titanium rod, (ii) PEEK rod with interbody PEEK cage, (iii) Biodegradable rod with interbody PEEK cage, and (iv) PEEK cage without pedicle screw fixation (no rods). Results Fusion of the lumbar spine using PEEK or biodegradable rods allowed a similar ROM at both the fusion and adjacent levels under all conditions. The models with PEEK and biodegradable rods also showed a similar increase in contact forces at adjacent facet joints, but both were less than the model with a titanium rod. Conclusions Flexible rods or cages with non-instrumented fusion can mitigate the increased contact forces on adjacent facet joints typically found following spinal fixation, and could also reduce the level of stress shielding at the bone graft.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T22:15:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8bfd02cc780b4b0f9ea3af67676a501f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2474
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T22:15:21Z
publishDate 2020-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
spelling doaj.art-8bfd02cc780b4b0f9ea3af67676a501f2022-12-22T03:14:33ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742020-02-012111910.1186/s12891-020-3111-1Biomechanical analysis of single-level interbody fusion with different internal fixation rod materials: a finite element analysisYueh-Ying Hsieh0Fon-Yih Tsuang1Yi-Jie Kuo2Chia-Hsien Chen3Chang-Jung Chiang4Chun-Li Lin5Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming UniversityDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University HospitalDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical UniversityDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical UniversityDepartment of Orthopedics, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical UniversityDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming UniversityAbstract Background Lumbar spinal fusion with rigid spinal fixators as one of the high risk factors related to adjacent-segment failure. The purpose of this study is to investigate how the material properties of spinal fixation rods influence the biomechanical behavior at the instrumented and adjacent levels through the use of the finite element method. Methods Five finite element models were constructed in our study to simulate the human spine pre- and post-surgery. For the four post-surgical models, the spines were implanted with rods made of three different materials: (i) titanium rod, (ii) PEEK rod with interbody PEEK cage, (iii) Biodegradable rod with interbody PEEK cage, and (iv) PEEK cage without pedicle screw fixation (no rods). Results Fusion of the lumbar spine using PEEK or biodegradable rods allowed a similar ROM at both the fusion and adjacent levels under all conditions. The models with PEEK and biodegradable rods also showed a similar increase in contact forces at adjacent facet joints, but both were less than the model with a titanium rod. Conclusions Flexible rods or cages with non-instrumented fusion can mitigate the increased contact forces on adjacent facet joints typically found following spinal fixation, and could also reduce the level of stress shielding at the bone graft.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3111-1Spinal interbody fusionFlexible rodsFinite element analysisBiomechanical study
spellingShingle Yueh-Ying Hsieh
Fon-Yih Tsuang
Yi-Jie Kuo
Chia-Hsien Chen
Chang-Jung Chiang
Chun-Li Lin
Biomechanical analysis of single-level interbody fusion with different internal fixation rod materials: a finite element analysis
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Spinal interbody fusion
Flexible rods
Finite element analysis
Biomechanical study
title Biomechanical analysis of single-level interbody fusion with different internal fixation rod materials: a finite element analysis
title_full Biomechanical analysis of single-level interbody fusion with different internal fixation rod materials: a finite element analysis
title_fullStr Biomechanical analysis of single-level interbody fusion with different internal fixation rod materials: a finite element analysis
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical analysis of single-level interbody fusion with different internal fixation rod materials: a finite element analysis
title_short Biomechanical analysis of single-level interbody fusion with different internal fixation rod materials: a finite element analysis
title_sort biomechanical analysis of single level interbody fusion with different internal fixation rod materials a finite element analysis
topic Spinal interbody fusion
Flexible rods
Finite element analysis
Biomechanical study
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3111-1
work_keys_str_mv AT yuehyinghsieh biomechanicalanalysisofsinglelevelinterbodyfusionwithdifferentinternalfixationrodmaterialsafiniteelementanalysis
AT fonyihtsuang biomechanicalanalysisofsinglelevelinterbodyfusionwithdifferentinternalfixationrodmaterialsafiniteelementanalysis
AT yijiekuo biomechanicalanalysisofsinglelevelinterbodyfusionwithdifferentinternalfixationrodmaterialsafiniteelementanalysis
AT chiahsienchen biomechanicalanalysisofsinglelevelinterbodyfusionwithdifferentinternalfixationrodmaterialsafiniteelementanalysis
AT changjungchiang biomechanicalanalysisofsinglelevelinterbodyfusionwithdifferentinternalfixationrodmaterialsafiniteelementanalysis
AT chunlilin biomechanicalanalysisofsinglelevelinterbodyfusionwithdifferentinternalfixationrodmaterialsafiniteelementanalysis