A Framework for Analysis and Development of Augmented Reality Applications in Science and Engineering Teaching

As augmented reality (AR) becomes a promising technology for use in science and engineering teaching, the need for generally valid criteria and frameworks for the analysis, development, and setup of AR applications arises. In this article, we present an evaluations matrix to analyze current augmente...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Valerie Czok, Manuel Krug, Sascha Müller, Johannes Huwer, Stefan Kruse, Wolfgang Müller, Holger Weitzel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-09-01
Series:Education Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/13/9/926
_version_ 1797580526643576832
author Valerie Czok
Manuel Krug
Sascha Müller
Johannes Huwer
Stefan Kruse
Wolfgang Müller
Holger Weitzel
author_facet Valerie Czok
Manuel Krug
Sascha Müller
Johannes Huwer
Stefan Kruse
Wolfgang Müller
Holger Weitzel
author_sort Valerie Czok
collection DOAJ
description As augmented reality (AR) becomes a promising technology for use in science and engineering teaching, the need for generally valid criteria and frameworks for the analysis, development, and setup of AR applications arises. In this article, we present an evaluations matrix to analyze current augmented reality approaches for life science teaching (biology, chemistry) and engineering and simultaneously provide directives for future augmented reality application designs. Based on an extensive literature review followed by focus group discussions with experts, the evaluation matrix combines domain-specific aspects, technical features, and subject and media didactical principles to determine seven select parameters. This ensures adequate coverage of the broad range of key considerations in the development of augmented reality technology for science and engineering teaching. Through cluster analysis, two groups of applications could be identified. The first group comprises applications whose development was more technology-driven. Applications in the second group take more didactic criteria into account and are to be considered more holistically from an instructional perspective. No correlation could be observed between the design of the AR application and the intended learning effects. The parameters derived for the evaluation matrix contribute to specifying relevant criteria for the development of AR applications.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T22:51:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8c01ae989d534b7e8635e4c9ab685960
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-7102
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T22:51:19Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Education Sciences
spelling doaj.art-8c01ae989d534b7e8635e4c9ab6859602023-11-19T10:19:32ZengMDPI AGEducation Sciences2227-71022023-09-0113992610.3390/educsci13090926A Framework for Analysis and Development of Augmented Reality Applications in Science and Engineering TeachingValerie Czok0Manuel Krug1Sascha Müller2Johannes Huwer3Stefan Kruse4Wolfgang Müller5Holger Weitzel6Department of Biology, University of Education Weingarten, 88250 Weingarten, GermanyChair of Science Education, University of Konstanz, 78464 Konstanz, GermanyDepartment of Engineering, University of Education Weingarten, 88250 Weingarten, GermanyChair of Science Education, University of Konstanz, 78464 Konstanz, GermanyDepartment of Engineering, University of Education Weingarten, 88250 Weingarten, GermanyMedia Education and Visualization Working Group (MEVIS), University of Education Weingarten, 88250 Weingarten, GermanyDepartment of Biology, University of Education Weingarten, 88250 Weingarten, GermanyAs augmented reality (AR) becomes a promising technology for use in science and engineering teaching, the need for generally valid criteria and frameworks for the analysis, development, and setup of AR applications arises. In this article, we present an evaluations matrix to analyze current augmented reality approaches for life science teaching (biology, chemistry) and engineering and simultaneously provide directives for future augmented reality application designs. Based on an extensive literature review followed by focus group discussions with experts, the evaluation matrix combines domain-specific aspects, technical features, and subject and media didactical principles to determine seven select parameters. This ensures adequate coverage of the broad range of key considerations in the development of augmented reality technology for science and engineering teaching. Through cluster analysis, two groups of applications could be identified. The first group comprises applications whose development was more technology-driven. Applications in the second group take more didactic criteria into account and are to be considered more holistically from an instructional perspective. No correlation could be observed between the design of the AR application and the intended learning effects. The parameters derived for the evaluation matrix contribute to specifying relevant criteria for the development of AR applications.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/13/9/926science teachingaugmented realitysubject didacticsgame-based learningcluster analysisscience education
spellingShingle Valerie Czok
Manuel Krug
Sascha Müller
Johannes Huwer
Stefan Kruse
Wolfgang Müller
Holger Weitzel
A Framework for Analysis and Development of Augmented Reality Applications in Science and Engineering Teaching
Education Sciences
science teaching
augmented reality
subject didactics
game-based learning
cluster analysis
science education
title A Framework for Analysis and Development of Augmented Reality Applications in Science and Engineering Teaching
title_full A Framework for Analysis and Development of Augmented Reality Applications in Science and Engineering Teaching
title_fullStr A Framework for Analysis and Development of Augmented Reality Applications in Science and Engineering Teaching
title_full_unstemmed A Framework for Analysis and Development of Augmented Reality Applications in Science and Engineering Teaching
title_short A Framework for Analysis and Development of Augmented Reality Applications in Science and Engineering Teaching
title_sort framework for analysis and development of augmented reality applications in science and engineering teaching
topic science teaching
augmented reality
subject didactics
game-based learning
cluster analysis
science education
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/13/9/926
work_keys_str_mv AT valerieczok aframeworkforanalysisanddevelopmentofaugmentedrealityapplicationsinscienceandengineeringteaching
AT manuelkrug aframeworkforanalysisanddevelopmentofaugmentedrealityapplicationsinscienceandengineeringteaching
AT saschamuller aframeworkforanalysisanddevelopmentofaugmentedrealityapplicationsinscienceandengineeringteaching
AT johanneshuwer aframeworkforanalysisanddevelopmentofaugmentedrealityapplicationsinscienceandengineeringteaching
AT stefankruse aframeworkforanalysisanddevelopmentofaugmentedrealityapplicationsinscienceandengineeringteaching
AT wolfgangmuller aframeworkforanalysisanddevelopmentofaugmentedrealityapplicationsinscienceandengineeringteaching
AT holgerweitzel aframeworkforanalysisanddevelopmentofaugmentedrealityapplicationsinscienceandengineeringteaching
AT valerieczok frameworkforanalysisanddevelopmentofaugmentedrealityapplicationsinscienceandengineeringteaching
AT manuelkrug frameworkforanalysisanddevelopmentofaugmentedrealityapplicationsinscienceandengineeringteaching
AT saschamuller frameworkforanalysisanddevelopmentofaugmentedrealityapplicationsinscienceandengineeringteaching
AT johanneshuwer frameworkforanalysisanddevelopmentofaugmentedrealityapplicationsinscienceandengineeringteaching
AT stefankruse frameworkforanalysisanddevelopmentofaugmentedrealityapplicationsinscienceandengineeringteaching
AT wolfgangmuller frameworkforanalysisanddevelopmentofaugmentedrealityapplicationsinscienceandengineeringteaching
AT holgerweitzel frameworkforanalysisanddevelopmentofaugmentedrealityapplicationsinscienceandengineeringteaching