Manual Labour, Intellectual Labour and Digital (Academic) Labour. The Practice/Theory Debate in the Digital Humanities

Although it hasn’t much been considered as such, the Digital Humanities movements (or at least the most theoretically informed parts of it) offers a critique “from within” of the recent mutation of the higher education and research systems. This paper offers an analysis, from a Critical Theory persp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Christophe Magis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Paderborn University: Media Systems and Media Organisation Research Group 2018-01-01
Series:tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/847
_version_ 1827852062484856832
author Christophe Magis
author_facet Christophe Magis
author_sort Christophe Magis
collection DOAJ
description Although it hasn’t much been considered as such, the Digital Humanities movements (or at least the most theoretically informed parts of it) offers a critique “from within” of the recent mutation of the higher education and research systems. This paper offers an analysis, from a Critical Theory perspective, of a key element of this critique: the theory vs. practice debate, which, in the Digital Humanities, is translated into the famous “hack” versus “yack” motto, where DHers usually call for the pre-eminence of the former over the latter. I show how this debate aims to criticize the social situation of employment in academia in the digital age and can further be interpreted with the Cultural industry theoretical concept, as a continuance of the domination of the intellectual labour (ie. yack in this case) over the manual labour (hack). Nevertheless, I argue that, pushing this debate to its very dialectical limit in the post-industrial academic labour situation, one realizes that the two terms aren’t in opposition anymore: the actual theory as well as the actual practice are below their very critical concepts in the academic labour. Therefore, I call for a reconfiguration of this debate, aiming at the rediscovering of an actual theory in the academic production, as well as a rediscovering of a praxis, the latter being outside of the scientific realm and rules: it is political.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T10:43:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8c03c943aa0a478e8538b92a4d4151b9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1726-670X
1726-670X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T10:43:42Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Paderborn University: Media Systems and Media Organisation Research Group
record_format Article
series tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique
spelling doaj.art-8c03c943aa0a478e8538b92a4d4151b92023-09-02T07:47:49ZengPaderborn University: Media Systems and Media Organisation Research GrouptripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique1726-670X1726-670X2018-01-0116115917510.31269/triplec.v16i1.847847Manual Labour, Intellectual Labour and Digital (Academic) Labour. The Practice/Theory Debate in the Digital HumanitiesChristophe Magis0Université Paris 8 — CemtiAlthough it hasn’t much been considered as such, the Digital Humanities movements (or at least the most theoretically informed parts of it) offers a critique “from within” of the recent mutation of the higher education and research systems. This paper offers an analysis, from a Critical Theory perspective, of a key element of this critique: the theory vs. practice debate, which, in the Digital Humanities, is translated into the famous “hack” versus “yack” motto, where DHers usually call for the pre-eminence of the former over the latter. I show how this debate aims to criticize the social situation of employment in academia in the digital age and can further be interpreted with the Cultural industry theoretical concept, as a continuance of the domination of the intellectual labour (ie. yack in this case) over the manual labour (hack). Nevertheless, I argue that, pushing this debate to its very dialectical limit in the post-industrial academic labour situation, one realizes that the two terms aren’t in opposition anymore: the actual theory as well as the actual practice are below their very critical concepts in the academic labour. Therefore, I call for a reconfiguration of this debate, aiming at the rediscovering of an actual theory in the academic production, as well as a rediscovering of a praxis, the latter being outside of the scientific realm and rules: it is political.https://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/847Critical TheoryDigital HumanitiesCulture IndustryTheory/PraxisDigital Labour
spellingShingle Christophe Magis
Manual Labour, Intellectual Labour and Digital (Academic) Labour. The Practice/Theory Debate in the Digital Humanities
tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique
Critical Theory
Digital Humanities
Culture Industry
Theory/Praxis
Digital Labour
title Manual Labour, Intellectual Labour and Digital (Academic) Labour. The Practice/Theory Debate in the Digital Humanities
title_full Manual Labour, Intellectual Labour and Digital (Academic) Labour. The Practice/Theory Debate in the Digital Humanities
title_fullStr Manual Labour, Intellectual Labour and Digital (Academic) Labour. The Practice/Theory Debate in the Digital Humanities
title_full_unstemmed Manual Labour, Intellectual Labour and Digital (Academic) Labour. The Practice/Theory Debate in the Digital Humanities
title_short Manual Labour, Intellectual Labour and Digital (Academic) Labour. The Practice/Theory Debate in the Digital Humanities
title_sort manual labour intellectual labour and digital academic labour the practice theory debate in the digital humanities
topic Critical Theory
Digital Humanities
Culture Industry
Theory/Praxis
Digital Labour
url https://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/847
work_keys_str_mv AT christophemagis manuallabourintellectuallabouranddigitalacademiclabourthepracticetheorydebateinthedigitalhumanities