Comparative evaluation of microleakage around Class V cavities restored with alkasite restorative material with and without bonding agent and flowable composite resin: An in vitro study
Background: Marginal adaptability of restorative material is one of the prime factors for success of a restoration. Aim: To evaluate microleakage at enamel restoration and dentin restoration interface of Class V cavities restored with new alkasite restorative material Cention-N, with and without usi...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2019-01-01
|
| Series: | Indian Journal of Dental Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2019;volume=30;issue=3;spage=403;epage=407;aulast=Meshram |
| _version_ | 1818011430175113216 |
|---|---|
| author | Priyatama Meshram Vikas Meshram Devendra Palve Sanjay Patil Vandana Gade Amber Raut |
| author_facet | Priyatama Meshram Vikas Meshram Devendra Palve Sanjay Patil Vandana Gade Amber Raut |
| author_sort | Priyatama Meshram |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: Marginal adaptability of restorative material is one of the prime factors for success of a restoration. Aim: To evaluate microleakage at enamel restoration and dentin restoration interface of Class V cavities restored with new alkasite restorative material Cention-N, with and without using bonding agent and flowable composite resin. Materials and Methods: Thirty Class V tooth preparations were divided into three groups (n = 10): Group-I restored with Cention-N (Ivoclar Vivadent) without adhesive, Group-II was restored with Cention-N after application of eighth-generation bonding agent (3M ESPE, Single Bond Universal Adhesive), and Group-III was restored with flowable composite resin (Tetric-N-Flow, Ivoclar Vivadent). All samples were subjected to 200 thermocycles between temperature baths at 5°C and 55°C. All samples were cut longitudinally through the center of the restorations with the help of isomet diamond saw. The sections were then observed under binocular stereomicroscope at 20×. Two evaluators scored the depth of dye penetration independently at enamel and dentin margins. Statistical Analysis: Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric analysis followed by Dunn's multiple comparison tests were done to evaluate differences among the experimental groups. Mann–Whitney test was used to compare the difference between occlusal and gingival scores within each restoration. Results: Microleakage seen in decreasing order: Cention-N without adhesive >Flowable composite >Cention-N with adhesive. Conclusion: Microleakage at enamel restoration interface was less than microleakage at dentin restoration interface of each group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Least microleakage was seen with Cention-N with adhesive followed by flowable composite. More microleakage was seen with Cention-N without adhesive. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-14T06:07:43Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-8c0a48b905b34ee6b50e2a7f3a97495e |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0970-9290 1998-3603 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-14T06:07:43Z |
| publishDate | 2019-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Indian Journal of Dental Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-8c0a48b905b34ee6b50e2a7f3a97495e2022-12-22T02:08:28ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Dental Research0970-92901998-36032019-01-0130340340710.4103/ijdr.IJDR_767_17Comparative evaluation of microleakage around Class V cavities restored with alkasite restorative material with and without bonding agent and flowable composite resin: An in vitro studyPriyatama MeshramVikas MeshramDevendra PalveSanjay PatilVandana GadeAmber RautBackground: Marginal adaptability of restorative material is one of the prime factors for success of a restoration. Aim: To evaluate microleakage at enamel restoration and dentin restoration interface of Class V cavities restored with new alkasite restorative material Cention-N, with and without using bonding agent and flowable composite resin. Materials and Methods: Thirty Class V tooth preparations were divided into three groups (n = 10): Group-I restored with Cention-N (Ivoclar Vivadent) without adhesive, Group-II was restored with Cention-N after application of eighth-generation bonding agent (3M ESPE, Single Bond Universal Adhesive), and Group-III was restored with flowable composite resin (Tetric-N-Flow, Ivoclar Vivadent). All samples were subjected to 200 thermocycles between temperature baths at 5°C and 55°C. All samples were cut longitudinally through the center of the restorations with the help of isomet diamond saw. The sections were then observed under binocular stereomicroscope at 20×. Two evaluators scored the depth of dye penetration independently at enamel and dentin margins. Statistical Analysis: Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric analysis followed by Dunn's multiple comparison tests were done to evaluate differences among the experimental groups. Mann–Whitney test was used to compare the difference between occlusal and gingival scores within each restoration. Results: Microleakage seen in decreasing order: Cention-N without adhesive >Flowable composite >Cention-N with adhesive. Conclusion: Microleakage at enamel restoration interface was less than microleakage at dentin restoration interface of each group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Least microleakage was seen with Cention-N with adhesive followed by flowable composite. More microleakage was seen with Cention-N without adhesive.http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2019;volume=30;issue=3;spage=403;epage=407;aulast=MeshramBonding agentCention-Nflowable compositesmicroleakagepolymerization shrinkage |
| spellingShingle | Priyatama Meshram Vikas Meshram Devendra Palve Sanjay Patil Vandana Gade Amber Raut Comparative evaluation of microleakage around Class V cavities restored with alkasite restorative material with and without bonding agent and flowable composite resin: An in vitro study Indian Journal of Dental Research Bonding agent Cention-N flowable composites microleakage polymerization shrinkage |
| title | Comparative evaluation of microleakage around Class V cavities restored with alkasite restorative material with and without bonding agent and flowable composite resin: An in vitro study |
| title_full | Comparative evaluation of microleakage around Class V cavities restored with alkasite restorative material with and without bonding agent and flowable composite resin: An in vitro study |
| title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of microleakage around Class V cavities restored with alkasite restorative material with and without bonding agent and flowable composite resin: An in vitro study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of microleakage around Class V cavities restored with alkasite restorative material with and without bonding agent and flowable composite resin: An in vitro study |
| title_short | Comparative evaluation of microleakage around Class V cavities restored with alkasite restorative material with and without bonding agent and flowable composite resin: An in vitro study |
| title_sort | comparative evaluation of microleakage around class v cavities restored with alkasite restorative material with and without bonding agent and flowable composite resin an in vitro study |
| topic | Bonding agent Cention-N flowable composites microleakage polymerization shrinkage |
| url | http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2019;volume=30;issue=3;spage=403;epage=407;aulast=Meshram |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT priyatamameshram comparativeevaluationofmicroleakagearoundclassvcavitiesrestoredwithalkasiterestorativematerialwithandwithoutbondingagentandflowablecompositeresinaninvitrostudy AT vikasmeshram comparativeevaluationofmicroleakagearoundclassvcavitiesrestoredwithalkasiterestorativematerialwithandwithoutbondingagentandflowablecompositeresinaninvitrostudy AT devendrapalve comparativeevaluationofmicroleakagearoundclassvcavitiesrestoredwithalkasiterestorativematerialwithandwithoutbondingagentandflowablecompositeresinaninvitrostudy AT sanjaypatil comparativeevaluationofmicroleakagearoundclassvcavitiesrestoredwithalkasiterestorativematerialwithandwithoutbondingagentandflowablecompositeresinaninvitrostudy AT vandanagade comparativeevaluationofmicroleakagearoundclassvcavitiesrestoredwithalkasiterestorativematerialwithandwithoutbondingagentandflowablecompositeresinaninvitrostudy AT amberraut comparativeevaluationofmicroleakagearoundclassvcavitiesrestoredwithalkasiterestorativematerialwithandwithoutbondingagentandflowablecompositeresinaninvitrostudy |