Semantic Modelling of Archaeological Excavation Data. A review of the current state of the art and a roadmap of activities
Archaeological data repositories usually manage excavation data collections as project-level entities with restricted capacities to facilitate search or aggregation of excavation data at the sub-collection level (trenches, finds, season reports or excavation diaries etc.). More granular access to ex...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of York
2023-10-01
|
| Series: | Internet Archaeology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue64/12/index.html |
| _version_ | 1797280385784086528 |
|---|---|
| author | Markos Katsianis George Bruseker Denitsa Nenova Olivier Marlet Florian Hivert Gerald Hiebel Christian-Emil Ore Paola Derudas Rachel Opitz Espen Uleberg |
| author_facet | Markos Katsianis George Bruseker Denitsa Nenova Olivier Marlet Florian Hivert Gerald Hiebel Christian-Emil Ore Paola Derudas Rachel Opitz Espen Uleberg |
| author_sort | Markos Katsianis |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Archaeological data repositories usually manage excavation data collections as project-level entities with restricted capacities to facilitate search or aggregation of excavation data at the sub-collection level (trenches, finds, season reports or excavation diaries etc.). More granular access to excavation data collections would enable layered querying across their informational content. In the past decade, several attempts to adapt CIDOC CRM in order to provide more explicit descriptions of the excavation universe have resulted in the use of domain-specific model extensions (e.g. CRMarchaeo, CRMsci, CRMba). Each focuses on corresponding aspects of the excavation research process, while their combined usage has potential to support expressive data mappings at the sub-collection level. As part of the ARIADNEplus project, several CIDOC CRM developers and domain experts have collaborated to undertake conceptual mapping exercises, to address the practicalities of bringing excavation data descriptions together and to link these to our overall aspirations in terms of excavation data discoverability and reusability. In this contribution, we discuss the current state and future directions of the field of semantic representation of archaeological excavation data and consider several issues that constrain the applicability of existing solutions. We identify five key enabling technologies or research areas (Conceptual models and semantic data structures, Conceptual modelling patterns, Data mapping workflows and tools, Learning technologies and Semantic queries) and assign readiness levels to assess their level of technological maturity. Our research demonstrates that while the existing models and domain-specific extensions are deemed adequate, there is a need for more user-friendly methods and tools to structure data in meaningful and interoperable ways. The next steps involve consolidating relevant semantic structures, improving modelling implementation guidance, adhering to consistent workflows, developing engaging curricula, and documenting real-case examples to demonstrate the benefits and results of semantic data integration. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T16:39:30Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-8c1f2201b51849a2818c4fb1aef48dbf |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1363-5387 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T16:39:30Z |
| publishDate | 2023-10-01 |
| publisher | University of York |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Internet Archaeology |
| spelling | doaj.art-8c1f2201b51849a2818c4fb1aef48dbf2024-03-03T08:38:20ZengUniversity of YorkInternet Archaeology1363-53872023-10-016410.11141/ia.64.12Semantic Modelling of Archaeological Excavation Data. A review of the current state of the art and a roadmap of activitiesMarkos Katsianis0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0585-3526George Bruseker1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7519-1970Denitsa Nenova2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3138-1689Olivier Marlet3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9422-1418Florian Hivert4https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1776-8246Gerald Hiebel5https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3799-8391Christian-Emil Ore6https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3455-8278Paola Derudas7https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2700-4143Rachel Opitz8https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5232-1434Espen Uleberg9https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6088-1669University of PatrasTakin.solutions LtdTakin.solutions LtdUniversity of ToursUniversity of ToursUniversität InnsbruckUniversity of OsloLund UniversityOpen Geospatial ConsortiumUniversity of OsloArchaeological data repositories usually manage excavation data collections as project-level entities with restricted capacities to facilitate search or aggregation of excavation data at the sub-collection level (trenches, finds, season reports or excavation diaries etc.). More granular access to excavation data collections would enable layered querying across their informational content. In the past decade, several attempts to adapt CIDOC CRM in order to provide more explicit descriptions of the excavation universe have resulted in the use of domain-specific model extensions (e.g. CRMarchaeo, CRMsci, CRMba). Each focuses on corresponding aspects of the excavation research process, while their combined usage has potential to support expressive data mappings at the sub-collection level. As part of the ARIADNEplus project, several CIDOC CRM developers and domain experts have collaborated to undertake conceptual mapping exercises, to address the practicalities of bringing excavation data descriptions together and to link these to our overall aspirations in terms of excavation data discoverability and reusability. In this contribution, we discuss the current state and future directions of the field of semantic representation of archaeological excavation data and consider several issues that constrain the applicability of existing solutions. We identify five key enabling technologies or research areas (Conceptual models and semantic data structures, Conceptual modelling patterns, Data mapping workflows and tools, Learning technologies and Semantic queries) and assign readiness levels to assess their level of technological maturity. Our research demonstrates that while the existing models and domain-specific extensions are deemed adequate, there is a need for more user-friendly methods and tools to structure data in meaningful and interoperable ways. The next steps involve consolidating relevant semantic structures, improving modelling implementation guidance, adhering to consistent workflows, developing engaging curricula, and documenting real-case examples to demonstrate the benefits and results of semantic data integration.https://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue64/12/index.htmlarchaeologyarchaeological excavationcidoc crmdata collectionsdata modellingdata mappingsemantic interoperabilityconceptual modelling patternstechnology readiness levels |
| spellingShingle | Markos Katsianis George Bruseker Denitsa Nenova Olivier Marlet Florian Hivert Gerald Hiebel Christian-Emil Ore Paola Derudas Rachel Opitz Espen Uleberg Semantic Modelling of Archaeological Excavation Data. A review of the current state of the art and a roadmap of activities Internet Archaeology archaeology archaeological excavation cidoc crm data collections data modelling data mapping semantic interoperability conceptual modelling patterns technology readiness levels |
| title | Semantic Modelling of Archaeological Excavation Data. A review of the current state of the art and a roadmap of activities |
| title_full | Semantic Modelling of Archaeological Excavation Data. A review of the current state of the art and a roadmap of activities |
| title_fullStr | Semantic Modelling of Archaeological Excavation Data. A review of the current state of the art and a roadmap of activities |
| title_full_unstemmed | Semantic Modelling of Archaeological Excavation Data. A review of the current state of the art and a roadmap of activities |
| title_short | Semantic Modelling of Archaeological Excavation Data. A review of the current state of the art and a roadmap of activities |
| title_sort | semantic modelling of archaeological excavation data a review of the current state of the art and a roadmap of activities |
| topic | archaeology archaeological excavation cidoc crm data collections data modelling data mapping semantic interoperability conceptual modelling patterns technology readiness levels |
| url | https://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue64/12/index.html |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT markoskatsianis semanticmodellingofarchaeologicalexcavationdataareviewofthecurrentstateoftheartandaroadmapofactivities AT georgebruseker semanticmodellingofarchaeologicalexcavationdataareviewofthecurrentstateoftheartandaroadmapofactivities AT denitsanenova semanticmodellingofarchaeologicalexcavationdataareviewofthecurrentstateoftheartandaroadmapofactivities AT oliviermarlet semanticmodellingofarchaeologicalexcavationdataareviewofthecurrentstateoftheartandaroadmapofactivities AT florianhivert semanticmodellingofarchaeologicalexcavationdataareviewofthecurrentstateoftheartandaroadmapofactivities AT geraldhiebel semanticmodellingofarchaeologicalexcavationdataareviewofthecurrentstateoftheartandaroadmapofactivities AT christianemilore semanticmodellingofarchaeologicalexcavationdataareviewofthecurrentstateoftheartandaroadmapofactivities AT paoladerudas semanticmodellingofarchaeologicalexcavationdataareviewofthecurrentstateoftheartandaroadmapofactivities AT rachelopitz semanticmodellingofarchaeologicalexcavationdataareviewofthecurrentstateoftheartandaroadmapofactivities AT espenuleberg semanticmodellingofarchaeologicalexcavationdataareviewofthecurrentstateoftheartandaroadmapofactivities |