P1.07 MEASUREMENT OF CAROTID INTIMA-MEDIA THICKNESS IN HEALTHY PERSONS AND PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES - A REPRODUCIBILITY STUDY

Background: Carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) measured by B-mode ultrasound is a sensitive and non-invasive method for detection of subclinical cardiovascular disease (CVD) and is often used as primary outcome measure in clinical trials as a surrogate marker of CVD. The purpose of the present stu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: L. Lundby Christensen, T. Almdal, A. Vaag, B. Carstensen, L. Tarnow, N. Wiinberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-12-01
Series:Artery Research
Online Access:https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125927322/view
_version_ 1811300940317196288
author L. Lundby Christensen
T. Almdal
A. Vaag
B. Carstensen
L. Tarnow
N. Wiinberg
author_facet L. Lundby Christensen
T. Almdal
A. Vaag
B. Carstensen
L. Tarnow
N. Wiinberg
author_sort L. Lundby Christensen
collection DOAJ
description Background: Carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) measured by B-mode ultrasound is a sensitive and non-invasive method for detection of subclinical cardiovascular disease (CVD) and is often used as primary outcome measure in clinical trials as a surrogate marker of CVD. The purpose of the present study was to quantify the repeatability of this method between and within sonographers and readers. Furthermore we studied the day-to-day variation. Methods: We used B-mode ultrasound and a computerized software programme (MIA vascular tools) for analysis of Carotid IMT (far wall of the common carotid artery). Measurement of Carotid IMT was done for 30 healthy persons and 28 T2D patients by two different sonographers and two different readers on two separate days. Results: Comparisons of Carotid IMT between readers assessing the same picture (reader variability) resulted in limits of agreement on the relative scale from 0.92 to 1.07, i.e. there is a 95% probability that the reading of a given picture by a second reader gives a thickness between 0.92 and 1.07 of the first reading. Comparing different sonographers resulted in limits of agreement from 0.83 to 1.22 We found no differences between healthy persons and patients with T2D. Conclusion: Measurement of carotid IMT has the same accuracy in both healthy persons and patients with T2D. The major sources of variation are the differences between sonographers and the day-to-day variation whereas the following reading of the recording using computerized software shows very little variation.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T06:59:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8c2651492df44508a66afbaae822e930
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1876-4401
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T06:59:57Z
publishDate 2009-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Artery Research
spelling doaj.art-8c2651492df44508a66afbaae822e9302022-12-22T02:57:09ZengBMCArtery Research1876-44012009-12-013410.1016/j.artres.2009.10.010P1.07 MEASUREMENT OF CAROTID INTIMA-MEDIA THICKNESS IN HEALTHY PERSONS AND PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES - A REPRODUCIBILITY STUDYL. Lundby ChristensenT. AlmdalA. VaagB. CarstensenL. TarnowN. WiinbergBackground: Carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) measured by B-mode ultrasound is a sensitive and non-invasive method for detection of subclinical cardiovascular disease (CVD) and is often used as primary outcome measure in clinical trials as a surrogate marker of CVD. The purpose of the present study was to quantify the repeatability of this method between and within sonographers and readers. Furthermore we studied the day-to-day variation. Methods: We used B-mode ultrasound and a computerized software programme (MIA vascular tools) for analysis of Carotid IMT (far wall of the common carotid artery). Measurement of Carotid IMT was done for 30 healthy persons and 28 T2D patients by two different sonographers and two different readers on two separate days. Results: Comparisons of Carotid IMT between readers assessing the same picture (reader variability) resulted in limits of agreement on the relative scale from 0.92 to 1.07, i.e. there is a 95% probability that the reading of a given picture by a second reader gives a thickness between 0.92 and 1.07 of the first reading. Comparing different sonographers resulted in limits of agreement from 0.83 to 1.22 We found no differences between healthy persons and patients with T2D. Conclusion: Measurement of carotid IMT has the same accuracy in both healthy persons and patients with T2D. The major sources of variation are the differences between sonographers and the day-to-day variation whereas the following reading of the recording using computerized software shows very little variation.https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125927322/view
spellingShingle L. Lundby Christensen
T. Almdal
A. Vaag
B. Carstensen
L. Tarnow
N. Wiinberg
P1.07 MEASUREMENT OF CAROTID INTIMA-MEDIA THICKNESS IN HEALTHY PERSONS AND PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES - A REPRODUCIBILITY STUDY
Artery Research
title P1.07 MEASUREMENT OF CAROTID INTIMA-MEDIA THICKNESS IN HEALTHY PERSONS AND PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES - A REPRODUCIBILITY STUDY
title_full P1.07 MEASUREMENT OF CAROTID INTIMA-MEDIA THICKNESS IN HEALTHY PERSONS AND PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES - A REPRODUCIBILITY STUDY
title_fullStr P1.07 MEASUREMENT OF CAROTID INTIMA-MEDIA THICKNESS IN HEALTHY PERSONS AND PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES - A REPRODUCIBILITY STUDY
title_full_unstemmed P1.07 MEASUREMENT OF CAROTID INTIMA-MEDIA THICKNESS IN HEALTHY PERSONS AND PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES - A REPRODUCIBILITY STUDY
title_short P1.07 MEASUREMENT OF CAROTID INTIMA-MEDIA THICKNESS IN HEALTHY PERSONS AND PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES - A REPRODUCIBILITY STUDY
title_sort p1 07 measurement of carotid intima media thickness in healthy persons and patients with type 2 diabetes a reproducibility study
url https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125927322/view
work_keys_str_mv AT llundbychristensen p107measurementofcarotidintimamediathicknessinhealthypersonsandpatientswithtype2diabetesareproducibilitystudy
AT talmdal p107measurementofcarotidintimamediathicknessinhealthypersonsandpatientswithtype2diabetesareproducibilitystudy
AT avaag p107measurementofcarotidintimamediathicknessinhealthypersonsandpatientswithtype2diabetesareproducibilitystudy
AT bcarstensen p107measurementofcarotidintimamediathicknessinhealthypersonsandpatientswithtype2diabetesareproducibilitystudy
AT ltarnow p107measurementofcarotidintimamediathicknessinhealthypersonsandpatientswithtype2diabetesareproducibilitystudy
AT nwiinberg p107measurementofcarotidintimamediathicknessinhealthypersonsandpatientswithtype2diabetesareproducibilitystudy