Construct validity of competency dimensions in a team leader assessment centre

The aim of the study was to examine the construct validity of an assessment centre. The sample included 138 individuals who participated in a one-day call centre team leader assessment centre. Nine competency dimensions were rated using six exercises. Correlations and a principle axis factor analysi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lee-Ann Greyling, Deléne Visser, Linda Fourie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2003-10-01
Series:SA Journal of Industrial Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip/article/view/97
_version_ 1811336587651317760
author Lee-Ann Greyling
Deléne Visser
Linda Fourie
author_facet Lee-Ann Greyling
Deléne Visser
Linda Fourie
author_sort Lee-Ann Greyling
collection DOAJ
description The aim of the study was to examine the construct validity of an assessment centre. The sample included 138 individuals who participated in a one-day call centre team leader assessment centre. Nine competency dimensions were rated using six exercises. Correlations and a principle axis factor analysis were utilised to study the convergent and discriminant validity of the dimension ratings. The results showed that the ratings clustered according to exercises rather than to dimensions (traits), thereby indicating a substantial amount of method variance. A further factor analysis of the nine competency dimensions yielded two factors that were named interpersonal and problem solving. Implications for the design of assessment centres are discussed. Opsomming Die doel van die studie was om die konstrukgeldigheid van ’n takseersentrum te ondersoek. Die steekproef het uit 138 persone bestaan wat aan ’n eendagtakseersentrum vir oproepsentrumgroepleiers deelgeneem het. Ses oefeninge is gebruik om nege bevoegdheidsdimensies te meet. Korrelasies en ’n hoofasfaktorontleding is gebruik om die konvergente en diskriminante geldigheid van die dimensiebeoordelings te bestudeer. Die resultate het getoon dat die beoordelings volgens oefeninge eerder as dimensies (eienskappe) gegroepeer het. Hierdie bevinding dui op ’n hoë mate van metodevariansie. ’n Verdere faktorontleding van die nege bevoegdheidsdimensies het twee faktore, wat as interpersoonlik en probleemoplossend benoem is, opgelewer. Implikasies vir die ontwerp van takseersentrums word bespreek.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T17:41:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8c37483940344fefa28f4efe4683be98
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0258-5200
2071-0763
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T17:41:36Z
publishDate 2003-10-01
publisher AOSIS
record_format Article
series SA Journal of Industrial Psychology
spelling doaj.art-8c37483940344fefa28f4efe4683be982022-12-22T02:37:10ZengAOSISSA Journal of Industrial Psychology0258-52002071-07632003-10-0129210.4102/sajip.v29i2.9794Construct validity of competency dimensions in a team leader assessment centreLee-Ann Greyling0Deléne Visser1Linda Fourie2Rand Afrikaans UniversityRand Afrikaans UniversityRand Afrikaans UniversityThe aim of the study was to examine the construct validity of an assessment centre. The sample included 138 individuals who participated in a one-day call centre team leader assessment centre. Nine competency dimensions were rated using six exercises. Correlations and a principle axis factor analysis were utilised to study the convergent and discriminant validity of the dimension ratings. The results showed that the ratings clustered according to exercises rather than to dimensions (traits), thereby indicating a substantial amount of method variance. A further factor analysis of the nine competency dimensions yielded two factors that were named interpersonal and problem solving. Implications for the design of assessment centres are discussed. Opsomming Die doel van die studie was om die konstrukgeldigheid van ’n takseersentrum te ondersoek. Die steekproef het uit 138 persone bestaan wat aan ’n eendagtakseersentrum vir oproepsentrumgroepleiers deelgeneem het. Ses oefeninge is gebruik om nege bevoegdheidsdimensies te meet. Korrelasies en ’n hoofasfaktorontleding is gebruik om die konvergente en diskriminante geldigheid van die dimensiebeoordelings te bestudeer. Die resultate het getoon dat die beoordelings volgens oefeninge eerder as dimensies (eienskappe) gegroepeer het. Hierdie bevinding dui op ’n hoë mate van metodevariansie. ’n Verdere faktorontleding van die nege bevoegdheidsdimensies het twee faktore, wat as interpersoonlik en probleemoplossend benoem is, opgelewer. Implikasies vir die ontwerp van takseersentrums word bespreek.https://sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip/article/view/97Team leader assessment centreConstruct validityCompetency dimensions
spellingShingle Lee-Ann Greyling
Deléne Visser
Linda Fourie
Construct validity of competency dimensions in a team leader assessment centre
SA Journal of Industrial Psychology
Team leader assessment centre
Construct validity
Competency dimensions
title Construct validity of competency dimensions in a team leader assessment centre
title_full Construct validity of competency dimensions in a team leader assessment centre
title_fullStr Construct validity of competency dimensions in a team leader assessment centre
title_full_unstemmed Construct validity of competency dimensions in a team leader assessment centre
title_short Construct validity of competency dimensions in a team leader assessment centre
title_sort construct validity of competency dimensions in a team leader assessment centre
topic Team leader assessment centre
Construct validity
Competency dimensions
url https://sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip/article/view/97
work_keys_str_mv AT leeanngreyling constructvalidityofcompetencydimensionsinateamleaderassessmentcentre
AT delenevisser constructvalidityofcompetencydimensionsinateamleaderassessmentcentre
AT lindafourie constructvalidityofcompetencydimensionsinateamleaderassessmentcentre