Analysis of Socioeconomic Factors Affecting Follow-Up in a Glaucoma Screening Program

Patrick C Staropoli, 1 Richard K Lee, 1 Zachary A Kroger, 2 Karina Somohano, 3 Matthew Feldman, 4 Jennifer D Verriotto, 1 Adam Aldahan, 5 Potyra R Rosa, 1 William J Feuer, 1 D Diane Zheng, 6 David J Lee, 1, 6 Byron L Lam 1 1Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Staropoli PC, Lee RK, Kroger ZA, Somohano K, Feldman M, Verriotto JD, Aldahan A, Rosa PR, Feuer WJ, Zheng DD, Lee DJ, Lam BL
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2021-12-01
Series:Clinical Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/analysis-of-socioeconomic-factors-affecting-follow-up-in-a-glaucoma-sc-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-OPTH
_version_ 1819007432896020480
author Staropoli PC
Lee RK
Kroger ZA
Somohano K
Feldman M
Verriotto JD
Aldahan A
Rosa PR
Feuer WJ
Zheng DD
Lee DJ
Lam BL
author_facet Staropoli PC
Lee RK
Kroger ZA
Somohano K
Feldman M
Verriotto JD
Aldahan A
Rosa PR
Feuer WJ
Zheng DD
Lee DJ
Lam BL
author_sort Staropoli PC
collection DOAJ
description Patrick C Staropoli, 1 Richard K Lee, 1 Zachary A Kroger, 2 Karina Somohano, 3 Matthew Feldman, 4 Jennifer D Verriotto, 1 Adam Aldahan, 5 Potyra R Rosa, 1 William J Feuer, 1 D Diane Zheng, 6 David J Lee, 1, 6 Byron L Lam 1 1Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA; 2Ophthalmology Department, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA; 3Ophthalmology Department, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA; 4Neurology Department, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA; 5Dermatology Department, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA; 6Department of Public Health Sciences, University Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USACorrespondence: Byron L LamBascom Palmer Eye Institute, 900 NW 17 Street, Miami, FL, 33136, USATel +1 305-326-6021Fax +1 305 326 6114Email blam@med.miami.eduPurpose: To determine what socioeconomic factors affect follow-up in a glaucoma screening program.Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of six health fairs in South Florida from October 2012 to March 2013 among socially and economically disadvantaged populations. Visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP), cup-to-disc ratio (CDR), and visual field testing were obtained to identify glaucoma suspects. Glaucoma suspects were defined as having intraocular pressure ≥ 24 mm Hg, cup-to-disc ratio of ≥ 0.6 in either eye, or glaucomatous defects on visual field testing. In July 2015, telephone surveys were administered to assess follow up and socioeconomic factors.Results: Seventy-two out of 144 (50%) glaucoma suspects responded to the survey and were included in the analysis. Of the 72 respondents, average age was 52.8 years old and 65% were female. The most common race was African American (69%) and ethnicity was Haitian (51%). Glaucoma suspects who followed up were significantly more likely to have health insurance compared to those who did not follow up (74% vs 43%, p = 0.014). No significant difference in follow-up based on age (p = 0.125), education (p = 0.151), gender (p = 0.48), or ethnicity (p = 0.707) was identified. Of the 30 respondents, who did not follow up, the most common reasons were “no insurance” (57%, 17/30) and “not worried” (33%, 10/30).Conclusion: Insurance was the main socioeconomic factor in determining whether glaucoma suspects followed up after community health screenings. Streamlining social services could increase clinical access of glaucoma suspects.Keywords: epidemiology, follow-up, glaucoma, socioeconomics
first_indexed 2024-12-21T00:24:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8c3e406a5aa34540b32bbc8a83d4b0da
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1177-5483
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T00:24:30Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Clinical Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-8c3e406a5aa34540b32bbc8a83d4b0da2022-12-21T19:22:01ZengDove Medical PressClinical Ophthalmology1177-54832021-12-01Volume 154855486371877Analysis of Socioeconomic Factors Affecting Follow-Up in a Glaucoma Screening ProgramStaropoli PCLee RKKroger ZASomohano KFeldman MVerriotto JDAldahan ARosa PRFeuer WJZheng DDLee DJLam BLPatrick C Staropoli, 1 Richard K Lee, 1 Zachary A Kroger, 2 Karina Somohano, 3 Matthew Feldman, 4 Jennifer D Verriotto, 1 Adam Aldahan, 5 Potyra R Rosa, 1 William J Feuer, 1 D Diane Zheng, 6 David J Lee, 1, 6 Byron L Lam 1 1Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA; 2Ophthalmology Department, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA; 3Ophthalmology Department, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA; 4Neurology Department, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA; 5Dermatology Department, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA; 6Department of Public Health Sciences, University Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USACorrespondence: Byron L LamBascom Palmer Eye Institute, 900 NW 17 Street, Miami, FL, 33136, USATel +1 305-326-6021Fax +1 305 326 6114Email blam@med.miami.eduPurpose: To determine what socioeconomic factors affect follow-up in a glaucoma screening program.Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of six health fairs in South Florida from October 2012 to March 2013 among socially and economically disadvantaged populations. Visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP), cup-to-disc ratio (CDR), and visual field testing were obtained to identify glaucoma suspects. Glaucoma suspects were defined as having intraocular pressure ≥ 24 mm Hg, cup-to-disc ratio of ≥ 0.6 in either eye, or glaucomatous defects on visual field testing. In July 2015, telephone surveys were administered to assess follow up and socioeconomic factors.Results: Seventy-two out of 144 (50%) glaucoma suspects responded to the survey and were included in the analysis. Of the 72 respondents, average age was 52.8 years old and 65% were female. The most common race was African American (69%) and ethnicity was Haitian (51%). Glaucoma suspects who followed up were significantly more likely to have health insurance compared to those who did not follow up (74% vs 43%, p = 0.014). No significant difference in follow-up based on age (p = 0.125), education (p = 0.151), gender (p = 0.48), or ethnicity (p = 0.707) was identified. Of the 30 respondents, who did not follow up, the most common reasons were “no insurance” (57%, 17/30) and “not worried” (33%, 10/30).Conclusion: Insurance was the main socioeconomic factor in determining whether glaucoma suspects followed up after community health screenings. Streamlining social services could increase clinical access of glaucoma suspects.Keywords: epidemiology, follow-up, glaucoma, socioeconomicshttps://www.dovepress.com/analysis-of-socioeconomic-factors-affecting-follow-up-in-a-glaucoma-sc-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-OPTHepidemiologyfollow-upglaucomasocioeconomics
spellingShingle Staropoli PC
Lee RK
Kroger ZA
Somohano K
Feldman M
Verriotto JD
Aldahan A
Rosa PR
Feuer WJ
Zheng DD
Lee DJ
Lam BL
Analysis of Socioeconomic Factors Affecting Follow-Up in a Glaucoma Screening Program
Clinical Ophthalmology
epidemiology
follow-up
glaucoma
socioeconomics
title Analysis of Socioeconomic Factors Affecting Follow-Up in a Glaucoma Screening Program
title_full Analysis of Socioeconomic Factors Affecting Follow-Up in a Glaucoma Screening Program
title_fullStr Analysis of Socioeconomic Factors Affecting Follow-Up in a Glaucoma Screening Program
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Socioeconomic Factors Affecting Follow-Up in a Glaucoma Screening Program
title_short Analysis of Socioeconomic Factors Affecting Follow-Up in a Glaucoma Screening Program
title_sort analysis of socioeconomic factors affecting follow up in a glaucoma screening program
topic epidemiology
follow-up
glaucoma
socioeconomics
url https://www.dovepress.com/analysis-of-socioeconomic-factors-affecting-follow-up-in-a-glaucoma-sc-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-OPTH
work_keys_str_mv AT staropolipc analysisofsocioeconomicfactorsaffectingfollowupinaglaucomascreeningprogram
AT leerk analysisofsocioeconomicfactorsaffectingfollowupinaglaucomascreeningprogram
AT krogerza analysisofsocioeconomicfactorsaffectingfollowupinaglaucomascreeningprogram
AT somohanok analysisofsocioeconomicfactorsaffectingfollowupinaglaucomascreeningprogram
AT feldmanm analysisofsocioeconomicfactorsaffectingfollowupinaglaucomascreeningprogram
AT verriottojd analysisofsocioeconomicfactorsaffectingfollowupinaglaucomascreeningprogram
AT aldahana analysisofsocioeconomicfactorsaffectingfollowupinaglaucomascreeningprogram
AT rosapr analysisofsocioeconomicfactorsaffectingfollowupinaglaucomascreeningprogram
AT feuerwj analysisofsocioeconomicfactorsaffectingfollowupinaglaucomascreeningprogram
AT zhengdd analysisofsocioeconomicfactorsaffectingfollowupinaglaucomascreeningprogram
AT leedj analysisofsocioeconomicfactorsaffectingfollowupinaglaucomascreeningprogram
AT lambl analysisofsocioeconomicfactorsaffectingfollowupinaglaucomascreeningprogram