Monitoring standard and extended half‐life products in hemophilia: Assay discrepancies for factor VIII and IX in pre‐ and postinfusion samples

Abstract Background Monitoring hemophilia treatment with extended half‐life products is challenging for coagulation laboratories since factor assays may show substantial differences between results obtained with the one‐stage assay (OSA) and the chromogenic substrate assay (CSA). Objectives The aim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cecilia Augustsson, Eva Norström, Nadine Gretenkort Andersson, Eva Zetterberg, Jan Astermark, Karin Strandberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-10-01
Series:Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12421
_version_ 1797717005601603584
author Cecilia Augustsson
Eva Norström
Nadine Gretenkort Andersson
Eva Zetterberg
Jan Astermark
Karin Strandberg
author_facet Cecilia Augustsson
Eva Norström
Nadine Gretenkort Andersson
Eva Zetterberg
Jan Astermark
Karin Strandberg
author_sort Cecilia Augustsson
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Monitoring hemophilia treatment with extended half‐life products is challenging for coagulation laboratories since factor assays may show substantial differences between results obtained with the one‐stage assay (OSA) and the chromogenic substrate assay (CSA). Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare different factor assays and global coagulation methods. Methods Factor VIII (FVIII) and IX (FIX) activities and global assay parameters were analyzed in pre‐ and postinfusion samples (5 patients 2 samples/product/method). Results Samples containing FVIII products (NovoEight, Elocta, and Nuwiq) gave higher levels when measured with CSA compared to OSA. The correlation was excellent (r2 ≥ .97) while biases of 42%‐72% of mean (CSA‐OSA) were obtained. With FVIII (OSA) as independent variable, the correlations to kaolin clot time (CT) and thrombin generation assay (TGA) peak were modest (r2 = .71‐.72 and .64‐.65, respectively), except for Nuwiq for which there was a poor correlation to TGA peak (r2 = .08). Samples containing Alprolix, a FIX product, gave a smaller difference between activity levels (CSA‐OSA), and the correlation was excellent (r2 = .96). With FIX (CSA) as independent variable for both Alprolix and Refixia, the correlations to Innovin CT and TGA peaks were weak (r2 = .33‐.45 and .44‐.76, respectively). Conclusions Our data show that factor activity assays differ between methods used and agents. These discrepancies indicate the value of having more than one type of assay available in the coagulation laboratory when monitoring hemophilia treatment with extended half‐life products. Global assays gave complementary information indicated by the modest correlations to factor activities.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T08:29:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8c504c13862e485fb1d0c5ebf971860e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2475-0379
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T08:29:53Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
spelling doaj.art-8c504c13862e485fb1d0c5ebf971860e2023-09-02T17:46:49ZengElsevierResearch and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis2475-03792020-10-01471114112010.1002/rth2.12421Monitoring standard and extended half‐life products in hemophilia: Assay discrepancies for factor VIII and IX in pre‐ and postinfusion samplesCecilia Augustsson0Eva Norström1Nadine Gretenkort Andersson2Eva Zetterberg3Jan Astermark4Karin Strandberg5Division of Laboratory Medicine, Coagulation Department of Clinical Chemistry and Pharmacology University and Regional Laboratories Region Skåne Malmö SwedenDivision of Laboratory Medicine, Coagulation Department of Clinical Chemistry and Pharmacology University and Regional Laboratories Region Skåne Malmö SwedenDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis Skåne University Hospital Lund University Malmö SwedenDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis Skåne University Hospital Lund University Malmö SwedenDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis Skåne University Hospital Lund University Malmö SwedenDivision of Laboratory Medicine, Coagulation Department of Clinical Chemistry and Pharmacology University and Regional Laboratories Region Skåne Malmö SwedenAbstract Background Monitoring hemophilia treatment with extended half‐life products is challenging for coagulation laboratories since factor assays may show substantial differences between results obtained with the one‐stage assay (OSA) and the chromogenic substrate assay (CSA). Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare different factor assays and global coagulation methods. Methods Factor VIII (FVIII) and IX (FIX) activities and global assay parameters were analyzed in pre‐ and postinfusion samples (5 patients 2 samples/product/method). Results Samples containing FVIII products (NovoEight, Elocta, and Nuwiq) gave higher levels when measured with CSA compared to OSA. The correlation was excellent (r2 ≥ .97) while biases of 42%‐72% of mean (CSA‐OSA) were obtained. With FVIII (OSA) as independent variable, the correlations to kaolin clot time (CT) and thrombin generation assay (TGA) peak were modest (r2 = .71‐.72 and .64‐.65, respectively), except for Nuwiq for which there was a poor correlation to TGA peak (r2 = .08). Samples containing Alprolix, a FIX product, gave a smaller difference between activity levels (CSA‐OSA), and the correlation was excellent (r2 = .96). With FIX (CSA) as independent variable for both Alprolix and Refixia, the correlations to Innovin CT and TGA peaks were weak (r2 = .33‐.45 and .44‐.76, respectively). Conclusions Our data show that factor activity assays differ between methods used and agents. These discrepancies indicate the value of having more than one type of assay available in the coagulation laboratory when monitoring hemophilia treatment with extended half‐life products. Global assays gave complementary information indicated by the modest correlations to factor activities.https://doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12421blood coagulation testscoagulantsdrug monitoringfactor IXfactor VIIIhemophilia A
spellingShingle Cecilia Augustsson
Eva Norström
Nadine Gretenkort Andersson
Eva Zetterberg
Jan Astermark
Karin Strandberg
Monitoring standard and extended half‐life products in hemophilia: Assay discrepancies for factor VIII and IX in pre‐ and postinfusion samples
Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
blood coagulation tests
coagulants
drug monitoring
factor IX
factor VIII
hemophilia A
title Monitoring standard and extended half‐life products in hemophilia: Assay discrepancies for factor VIII and IX in pre‐ and postinfusion samples
title_full Monitoring standard and extended half‐life products in hemophilia: Assay discrepancies for factor VIII and IX in pre‐ and postinfusion samples
title_fullStr Monitoring standard and extended half‐life products in hemophilia: Assay discrepancies for factor VIII and IX in pre‐ and postinfusion samples
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring standard and extended half‐life products in hemophilia: Assay discrepancies for factor VIII and IX in pre‐ and postinfusion samples
title_short Monitoring standard and extended half‐life products in hemophilia: Assay discrepancies for factor VIII and IX in pre‐ and postinfusion samples
title_sort monitoring standard and extended half life products in hemophilia assay discrepancies for factor viii and ix in pre and postinfusion samples
topic blood coagulation tests
coagulants
drug monitoring
factor IX
factor VIII
hemophilia A
url https://doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12421
work_keys_str_mv AT ceciliaaugustsson monitoringstandardandextendedhalflifeproductsinhemophiliaassaydiscrepanciesforfactorviiiandixinpreandpostinfusionsamples
AT evanorstrom monitoringstandardandextendedhalflifeproductsinhemophiliaassaydiscrepanciesforfactorviiiandixinpreandpostinfusionsamples
AT nadinegretenkortandersson monitoringstandardandextendedhalflifeproductsinhemophiliaassaydiscrepanciesforfactorviiiandixinpreandpostinfusionsamples
AT evazetterberg monitoringstandardandextendedhalflifeproductsinhemophiliaassaydiscrepanciesforfactorviiiandixinpreandpostinfusionsamples
AT janastermark monitoringstandardandextendedhalflifeproductsinhemophiliaassaydiscrepanciesforfactorviiiandixinpreandpostinfusionsamples
AT karinstrandberg monitoringstandardandextendedhalflifeproductsinhemophiliaassaydiscrepanciesforfactorviiiandixinpreandpostinfusionsamples