Variability Between Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC®) Guidelines and a Commercial Pharmacogenetics Laboratory in Genotype to Phenotype Interpretations For Patients Utilizing Psychotropics

Clinical practice environments without in-house pharmacogenetic testing often rely on commercial laboratories, especially in the setting of pharmacogenetic testing intended to guide psychotropic use. There are occasionally differences in phenotype assignment and medication recommendations between co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christopher Blazy, Vicki Ellingrod, Kristen Ward
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Pharmacology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2022.939313/full
_version_ 1818213902549254144
author Christopher Blazy
Vicki Ellingrod
Kristen Ward
Kristen Ward
author_facet Christopher Blazy
Vicki Ellingrod
Kristen Ward
Kristen Ward
author_sort Christopher Blazy
collection DOAJ
description Clinical practice environments without in-house pharmacogenetic testing often rely on commercial laboratories, especially in the setting of pharmacogenetic testing intended to guide psychotropic use. There are occasionally differences in phenotype assignment and medication recommendations between commercial laboratories and the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC). This may be problematic as many institutions that implement pharmacogenetics consider CPIC to be an important source of guidelines for recommended prescribing actions based on genetics, as well as a tool towards standardizing pharmacogenetics implementation. Here, we completed a retrospective chart review of our academic health system’s (Michigan Medicine) electronic health record with the goal of comparing phenotypic assignment of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes between the commercial pharmacogenetic lab used most at our institution, and CPIC. Ultimately, we identified 205 patients with available pharmacogenetic results from this lab. The prevalence of conflicting phenotype assignment was 28.8% for CYP2D6 and 32.2% for CYP2C19 genotypes when comparing the commercial lab to CPIC guidelines. In several cases, the phenotypic assignment differences for antidepressants led to significant differences in medication recommendations when comparing the commercial lab report and CPIC guidelines. These results may also have implications for medications outside of psychiatry with recommendations for dose adjustments based on CYP2D6 or CYP2C19 metabolizing phenotype.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T06:11:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8c60eff24422443f9457f571f118f91b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1663-9812
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T06:11:40Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pharmacology
spelling doaj.art-8c60eff24422443f9457f571f118f91b2022-12-22T00:35:08ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pharmacology1663-98122022-06-011310.3389/fphar.2022.939313939313Variability Between Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC®) Guidelines and a Commercial Pharmacogenetics Laboratory in Genotype to Phenotype Interpretations For Patients Utilizing PsychotropicsChristopher Blazy0Vicki Ellingrod1Kristen Ward2Kristen Ward3Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United StatesDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United StatesDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United StatesClinical Pharmacy Department, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, United StatesClinical practice environments without in-house pharmacogenetic testing often rely on commercial laboratories, especially in the setting of pharmacogenetic testing intended to guide psychotropic use. There are occasionally differences in phenotype assignment and medication recommendations between commercial laboratories and the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC). This may be problematic as many institutions that implement pharmacogenetics consider CPIC to be an important source of guidelines for recommended prescribing actions based on genetics, as well as a tool towards standardizing pharmacogenetics implementation. Here, we completed a retrospective chart review of our academic health system’s (Michigan Medicine) electronic health record with the goal of comparing phenotypic assignment of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes between the commercial pharmacogenetic lab used most at our institution, and CPIC. Ultimately, we identified 205 patients with available pharmacogenetic results from this lab. The prevalence of conflicting phenotype assignment was 28.8% for CYP2D6 and 32.2% for CYP2C19 genotypes when comparing the commercial lab to CPIC guidelines. In several cases, the phenotypic assignment differences for antidepressants led to significant differences in medication recommendations when comparing the commercial lab report and CPIC guidelines. These results may also have implications for medications outside of psychiatry with recommendations for dose adjustments based on CYP2D6 or CYP2C19 metabolizing phenotype.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2022.939313/fullcytochrome P-450 CYP2D6cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19pharmacogenomicsstar allelephenotypegenotype
spellingShingle Christopher Blazy
Vicki Ellingrod
Kristen Ward
Kristen Ward
Variability Between Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC®) Guidelines and a Commercial Pharmacogenetics Laboratory in Genotype to Phenotype Interpretations For Patients Utilizing Psychotropics
Frontiers in Pharmacology
cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6
cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19
pharmacogenomics
star allele
phenotype
genotype
title Variability Between Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC®) Guidelines and a Commercial Pharmacogenetics Laboratory in Genotype to Phenotype Interpretations For Patients Utilizing Psychotropics
title_full Variability Between Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC®) Guidelines and a Commercial Pharmacogenetics Laboratory in Genotype to Phenotype Interpretations For Patients Utilizing Psychotropics
title_fullStr Variability Between Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC®) Guidelines and a Commercial Pharmacogenetics Laboratory in Genotype to Phenotype Interpretations For Patients Utilizing Psychotropics
title_full_unstemmed Variability Between Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC®) Guidelines and a Commercial Pharmacogenetics Laboratory in Genotype to Phenotype Interpretations For Patients Utilizing Psychotropics
title_short Variability Between Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC®) Guidelines and a Commercial Pharmacogenetics Laboratory in Genotype to Phenotype Interpretations For Patients Utilizing Psychotropics
title_sort variability between clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium cpic r guidelines and a commercial pharmacogenetics laboratory in genotype to phenotype interpretations for patients utilizing psychotropics
topic cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6
cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19
pharmacogenomics
star allele
phenotype
genotype
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2022.939313/full
work_keys_str_mv AT christopherblazy variabilitybetweenclinicalpharmacogeneticsimplementationconsortiumcpicguidelinesandacommercialpharmacogeneticslaboratoryingenotypetophenotypeinterpretationsforpatientsutilizingpsychotropics
AT vickiellingrod variabilitybetweenclinicalpharmacogeneticsimplementationconsortiumcpicguidelinesandacommercialpharmacogeneticslaboratoryingenotypetophenotypeinterpretationsforpatientsutilizingpsychotropics
AT kristenward variabilitybetweenclinicalpharmacogeneticsimplementationconsortiumcpicguidelinesandacommercialpharmacogeneticslaboratoryingenotypetophenotypeinterpretationsforpatientsutilizingpsychotropics
AT kristenward variabilitybetweenclinicalpharmacogeneticsimplementationconsortiumcpicguidelinesandacommercialpharmacogeneticslaboratoryingenotypetophenotypeinterpretationsforpatientsutilizingpsychotropics