Maximizing the International Human Rights Litigation Toolkit: the Role of Consensus
Amongst the instruments making up the strategies for international human rights litigation, the notion of consensus constitutes a tool that is made available to the disputing parties by public international law. When expertly used, consensus can be quite useful to those invoking an evolutive interpr...
Main Author: | Francisco Pascual-Vives |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidad de Cádiz
2021-05-01
|
Series: | Paix et Sécurité Internationales |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://revistas.uca.es/index.php/paetsei/article/view/8405 |
Similar Items
-
Evolution interpretation and the European consensus before the European court of human rights
by: Pavel Bureš
Published: (2019-06-01) -
The Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse: Origins and Goals
by: Margo Schlanger
Published: (2018-11-01) -
Right to Information, Judicial Activism and the Rule of Law: The Case of Indonesia’s Mining Litigation
by: Myrna Asnawati Safitri
Published: (2018-10-01) -
Public Litigation and the Concept of “Deference” in Judicial Review
by: Abraham Klaasen
Published: (2015-12-01) -
Reflections on the Biowatch Dispute – Reviewing the fundamental rules on costs In the light of the needs of constitutional and/or public interest litigation
by: T Humby
Published: (2009-03-01)