Non-invasive central aortic pressure measurement: what limits its application in clinical practice?
The following article highlights the need for methodological transparency and consensus for an accurate and non-invasive assessment of central aortic blood pressure (aoBP), which would contribute to increasing its validity and value in both clinical and physiological research settings. The recording...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023-05-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1159433/full |
_version_ | 1827940915923124224 |
---|---|
author | Alejandro Diaz Yanina Zócalo Federico Salazar Daniel Bia |
author_facet | Alejandro Diaz Yanina Zócalo Federico Salazar Daniel Bia |
author_sort | Alejandro Diaz |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The following article highlights the need for methodological transparency and consensus for an accurate and non-invasive assessment of central aortic blood pressure (aoBP), which would contribute to increasing its validity and value in both clinical and physiological research settings. The recording method and site, the mathematical model used to quantify aoBP, and mainly the method applied to calibrate pulse waveforms are essential when estimating aoBP and should be considered when analyzing and/or comparing data from different works, populations and/or obtained with different approaches. Up to now, many questions remain concerning the incremental predictive ability of aoBP over peripheral blood pressure and the possible role of aoBP-guided therapy in everyday practice. In this article, we focus on “putting it on the table” and discussing the main aspects analyzed in the literature as potential determinants of the lack of consensus on the non-invasive measurement of aoBP. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-13T09:29:18Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-8c7c18f559a4459093f7fc5db96b6447 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2297-055X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-13T09:29:18Z |
publishDate | 2023-05-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine |
spelling | doaj.art-8c7c18f559a4459093f7fc5db96b64472023-05-26T04:28:48ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine2297-055X2023-05-011010.3389/fcvm.2023.11594331159433Non-invasive central aortic pressure measurement: what limits its application in clinical practice?Alejandro Diaz0Yanina Zócalo1Federico Salazar2Daniel Bia3Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Salud, UNICEN-CCT CONICET, Tandil, ArgentinaDepartamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Medicina, Centro Universitario de Investigación, Innovación y Diagnóstico Arterial (CUiiDARTE), Universidad de la República, Montevideo, UruguayHigh Blood Pressure Section, Cardiology Department, Hospital Privado de Comunidad, Mar del Plata, ArgentinaDepartamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Medicina, Centro Universitario de Investigación, Innovación y Diagnóstico Arterial (CUiiDARTE), Universidad de la República, Montevideo, UruguayThe following article highlights the need for methodological transparency and consensus for an accurate and non-invasive assessment of central aortic blood pressure (aoBP), which would contribute to increasing its validity and value in both clinical and physiological research settings. The recording method and site, the mathematical model used to quantify aoBP, and mainly the method applied to calibrate pulse waveforms are essential when estimating aoBP and should be considered when analyzing and/or comparing data from different works, populations and/or obtained with different approaches. Up to now, many questions remain concerning the incremental predictive ability of aoBP over peripheral blood pressure and the possible role of aoBP-guided therapy in everyday practice. In this article, we focus on “putting it on the table” and discussing the main aspects analyzed in the literature as potential determinants of the lack of consensus on the non-invasive measurement of aoBP.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1159433/fullaortic blood pressurecalibrationnon-invasive assessmentoscillometric methodblood pressure measurementcentral blood pressure measurement |
spellingShingle | Alejandro Diaz Yanina Zócalo Federico Salazar Daniel Bia Non-invasive central aortic pressure measurement: what limits its application in clinical practice? Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine aortic blood pressure calibration non-invasive assessment oscillometric method blood pressure measurement central blood pressure measurement |
title | Non-invasive central aortic pressure measurement: what limits its application in clinical practice? |
title_full | Non-invasive central aortic pressure measurement: what limits its application in clinical practice? |
title_fullStr | Non-invasive central aortic pressure measurement: what limits its application in clinical practice? |
title_full_unstemmed | Non-invasive central aortic pressure measurement: what limits its application in clinical practice? |
title_short | Non-invasive central aortic pressure measurement: what limits its application in clinical practice? |
title_sort | non invasive central aortic pressure measurement what limits its application in clinical practice |
topic | aortic blood pressure calibration non-invasive assessment oscillometric method blood pressure measurement central blood pressure measurement |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1159433/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alejandrodiaz noninvasivecentralaorticpressuremeasurementwhatlimitsitsapplicationinclinicalpractice AT yaninazocalo noninvasivecentralaorticpressuremeasurementwhatlimitsitsapplicationinclinicalpractice AT federicosalazar noninvasivecentralaorticpressuremeasurementwhatlimitsitsapplicationinclinicalpractice AT danielbia noninvasivecentralaorticpressuremeasurementwhatlimitsitsapplicationinclinicalpractice |