Self-reported data for mental workload modelling in human-computer interaction and third-level education

Mental workload (MWL) is an imprecise construct, with distinct definitions and no predominant measurement technique. It can be intuitively seen as the amount of mental activity devoted to a certain task over time. Several approaches have been proposed in the literature for the modelling and assessme...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lucas Rizzo, Luca Longo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-06-01
Series:Data in Brief
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340920303279
_version_ 1828419637204746240
author Lucas Rizzo
Luca Longo
author_facet Lucas Rizzo
Luca Longo
author_sort Lucas Rizzo
collection DOAJ
description Mental workload (MWL) is an imprecise construct, with distinct definitions and no predominant measurement technique. It can be intuitively seen as the amount of mental activity devoted to a certain task over time. Several approaches have been proposed in the literature for the modelling and assessment of MWL. In this paper, data related to two sets of tasks performed by participants under different conditions is reported. This data was gathered from different sets of questionnaires answered by these participants. These questionnaires were aimed at assessing the features believed by domain experts to influence overall mental workload. In total, 872 records are reported, each representing the answers given by a user after performing a task. On the one hand, collected data might support machine learning researchers interested in using predictive analytics for the assessment of mental workload. On the other hand, data, if exploited by a set of rules/arguments (as in [3]), may serve as knowledge-bases for researchers in the field of knowledge-based systems and automated reasoning. Lastly, data might serve as a source of information for mental workload designers interested in investigating the features reported here for mental workload modelling. This article was co-submitted from a research journal “An empirical evaluation of the inferential capacity of defeasible argumentation, non-monotonic fuzzy reasoning and expert systems” [3]. The reader is referred to it for the interpretation of the data.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T14:55:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8c7cd2e1b1df49c1bba20dc9188d3286
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-3409
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T14:55:55Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Data in Brief
spelling doaj.art-8c7cd2e1b1df49c1bba20dc9188d32862022-12-22T01:44:17ZengElsevierData in Brief2352-34092020-06-0130105433Self-reported data for mental workload modelling in human-computer interaction and third-level educationLucas Rizzo0Luca Longo1Technological University Dublin, Republic of IrelandTechnological University Dublin, Republic of Ireland; Corresponding author.Mental workload (MWL) is an imprecise construct, with distinct definitions and no predominant measurement technique. It can be intuitively seen as the amount of mental activity devoted to a certain task over time. Several approaches have been proposed in the literature for the modelling and assessment of MWL. In this paper, data related to two sets of tasks performed by participants under different conditions is reported. This data was gathered from different sets of questionnaires answered by these participants. These questionnaires were aimed at assessing the features believed by domain experts to influence overall mental workload. In total, 872 records are reported, each representing the answers given by a user after performing a task. On the one hand, collected data might support machine learning researchers interested in using predictive analytics for the assessment of mental workload. On the other hand, data, if exploited by a set of rules/arguments (as in [3]), may serve as knowledge-bases for researchers in the field of knowledge-based systems and automated reasoning. Lastly, data might serve as a source of information for mental workload designers interested in investigating the features reported here for mental workload modelling. This article was co-submitted from a research journal “An empirical evaluation of the inferential capacity of defeasible argumentation, non-monotonic fuzzy reasoning and expert systems” [3]. The reader is referred to it for the interpretation of the data.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340920303279Knowledge-based systemsFuzzy reasoningExpert systemsMental workloadAutomated reasoningArgumentation theory
spellingShingle Lucas Rizzo
Luca Longo
Self-reported data for mental workload modelling in human-computer interaction and third-level education
Data in Brief
Knowledge-based systems
Fuzzy reasoning
Expert systems
Mental workload
Automated reasoning
Argumentation theory
title Self-reported data for mental workload modelling in human-computer interaction and third-level education
title_full Self-reported data for mental workload modelling in human-computer interaction and third-level education
title_fullStr Self-reported data for mental workload modelling in human-computer interaction and third-level education
title_full_unstemmed Self-reported data for mental workload modelling in human-computer interaction and third-level education
title_short Self-reported data for mental workload modelling in human-computer interaction and third-level education
title_sort self reported data for mental workload modelling in human computer interaction and third level education
topic Knowledge-based systems
Fuzzy reasoning
Expert systems
Mental workload
Automated reasoning
Argumentation theory
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340920303279
work_keys_str_mv AT lucasrizzo selfreporteddataformentalworkloadmodellinginhumancomputerinteractionandthirdleveleducation
AT lucalongo selfreporteddataformentalworkloadmodellinginhumancomputerinteractionandthirdleveleducation