The approach of moderate constructivism towards the international regimes
This article adapts a theoretical approach toward explanations of international regimes. The main point is to see how moderate constructivism can contribute to the study of the international regimes. Since liberal institutionalism is the leading perspective on international regimes, this article de...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
International Association for Political Science Students (IAPSS)
2008-04-01
|
| Series: | Politikon |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://politikon.iapss.org/index.php/politikon/article/view/214 |
| Summary: | This article adapts a theoretical approach toward explanations of international regimes. The main point is to see how moderate constructivism can contribute to the study of the international regimes. Since liberal institutionalism is the leading perspective on international regimes, this article defies its main theoretical foundations rather "Prisoner's Dilemma" and "Market Failure". After viewing these explanations as not convincing we turn to the moderate constructivism by arguing that this perspective can provide better explanations by focusing on identity theory. By focusing on identity theory this article argues that the strength of international regimes depends on the identity of states. The behaviour of the great powers will take place as illustrations.
|
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2414-6633 |