Surrogate markers of visceral adiposity in young adults: waist circumference and body mass index are more accurate than waist hip ratio, model of adipose distribution and visceral adiposity index.

Surrogate indexes of visceral adiposity, a major risk factor for metabolic and cardiovascular disorders, are routinely used in clinical practice because objective measurements of visceral adiposity are expensive, may involve exposure to radiation, and their availability is limited. We compared sever...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Susana Borruel, José F Moltó, Macarena Alpañés, Elena Fernández-Durán, Francisco Álvarez-Blasco, Manuel Luque-Ramírez, Héctor F Escobar-Morreale
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114112
_version_ 1819111731398443008
author Susana Borruel
José F Moltó
Macarena Alpañés
Elena Fernández-Durán
Francisco Álvarez-Blasco
Manuel Luque-Ramírez
Héctor F Escobar-Morreale
author_facet Susana Borruel
José F Moltó
Macarena Alpañés
Elena Fernández-Durán
Francisco Álvarez-Blasco
Manuel Luque-Ramírez
Héctor F Escobar-Morreale
author_sort Susana Borruel
collection DOAJ
description Surrogate indexes of visceral adiposity, a major risk factor for metabolic and cardiovascular disorders, are routinely used in clinical practice because objective measurements of visceral adiposity are expensive, may involve exposure to radiation, and their availability is limited. We compared several surrogate indexes of visceral adiposity with ultrasound assessment of subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue depots in 99 young Caucasian adults, including 20 women without androgen excess, 53 women with polycystic ovary syndrome, and 26 men. Obesity was present in 7, 21, and 7 subjects, respectively. We obtained body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist-hip ratio (WHR), model of adipose distribution (MOAD), visceral adiposity index (VAI), and ultrasound measurements of subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue depots and hepatic steatosis. WC and BMI showed the strongest correlations with ultrasound measurements of visceral adiposity. Only WHR correlated with sex hormones. Linear stepwise regression models including VAI were only slightly stronger than models including BMI or WC in explaining the variability in the insulin sensitivity index (yet BMI and WC had higher individual standardized coefficients of regression), and these models were superior to those including WHR and MOAD. WC showed 0.94 (95% confidence interval 0.88-0.99) and BMI showed 0.91 (0.85-0.98) probability of identifying the presence of hepatic steatosis according to receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. In conclusion, WC and BMI not only the simplest to obtain, but are also the most accurate surrogate markers of visceral adiposity in young adults, and are good indicators of insulin resistance and powerful predictors of the presence of hepatic steatosis.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T04:02:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8c9567ef0c67485e837b95d58e88ee78
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T04:02:16Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-8c9567ef0c67485e837b95d58e88ee782022-12-21T18:39:42ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-01912e11411210.1371/journal.pone.0114112Surrogate markers of visceral adiposity in young adults: waist circumference and body mass index are more accurate than waist hip ratio, model of adipose distribution and visceral adiposity index.Susana BorruelJosé F MoltóMacarena AlpañésElena Fernández-DuránFrancisco Álvarez-BlascoManuel Luque-RamírezHéctor F Escobar-MorrealeSurrogate indexes of visceral adiposity, a major risk factor for metabolic and cardiovascular disorders, are routinely used in clinical practice because objective measurements of visceral adiposity are expensive, may involve exposure to radiation, and their availability is limited. We compared several surrogate indexes of visceral adiposity with ultrasound assessment of subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue depots in 99 young Caucasian adults, including 20 women without androgen excess, 53 women with polycystic ovary syndrome, and 26 men. Obesity was present in 7, 21, and 7 subjects, respectively. We obtained body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist-hip ratio (WHR), model of adipose distribution (MOAD), visceral adiposity index (VAI), and ultrasound measurements of subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue depots and hepatic steatosis. WC and BMI showed the strongest correlations with ultrasound measurements of visceral adiposity. Only WHR correlated with sex hormones. Linear stepwise regression models including VAI were only slightly stronger than models including BMI or WC in explaining the variability in the insulin sensitivity index (yet BMI and WC had higher individual standardized coefficients of regression), and these models were superior to those including WHR and MOAD. WC showed 0.94 (95% confidence interval 0.88-0.99) and BMI showed 0.91 (0.85-0.98) probability of identifying the presence of hepatic steatosis according to receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. In conclusion, WC and BMI not only the simplest to obtain, but are also the most accurate surrogate markers of visceral adiposity in young adults, and are good indicators of insulin resistance and powerful predictors of the presence of hepatic steatosis.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114112
spellingShingle Susana Borruel
José F Moltó
Macarena Alpañés
Elena Fernández-Durán
Francisco Álvarez-Blasco
Manuel Luque-Ramírez
Héctor F Escobar-Morreale
Surrogate markers of visceral adiposity in young adults: waist circumference and body mass index are more accurate than waist hip ratio, model of adipose distribution and visceral adiposity index.
PLoS ONE
title Surrogate markers of visceral adiposity in young adults: waist circumference and body mass index are more accurate than waist hip ratio, model of adipose distribution and visceral adiposity index.
title_full Surrogate markers of visceral adiposity in young adults: waist circumference and body mass index are more accurate than waist hip ratio, model of adipose distribution and visceral adiposity index.
title_fullStr Surrogate markers of visceral adiposity in young adults: waist circumference and body mass index are more accurate than waist hip ratio, model of adipose distribution and visceral adiposity index.
title_full_unstemmed Surrogate markers of visceral adiposity in young adults: waist circumference and body mass index are more accurate than waist hip ratio, model of adipose distribution and visceral adiposity index.
title_short Surrogate markers of visceral adiposity in young adults: waist circumference and body mass index are more accurate than waist hip ratio, model of adipose distribution and visceral adiposity index.
title_sort surrogate markers of visceral adiposity in young adults waist circumference and body mass index are more accurate than waist hip ratio model of adipose distribution and visceral adiposity index
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114112
work_keys_str_mv AT susanaborruel surrogatemarkersofvisceraladiposityinyoungadultswaistcircumferenceandbodymassindexaremoreaccuratethanwaisthipratiomodelofadiposedistributionandvisceraladiposityindex
AT josefmolto surrogatemarkersofvisceraladiposityinyoungadultswaistcircumferenceandbodymassindexaremoreaccuratethanwaisthipratiomodelofadiposedistributionandvisceraladiposityindex
AT macarenaalpanes surrogatemarkersofvisceraladiposityinyoungadultswaistcircumferenceandbodymassindexaremoreaccuratethanwaisthipratiomodelofadiposedistributionandvisceraladiposityindex
AT elenafernandezduran surrogatemarkersofvisceraladiposityinyoungadultswaistcircumferenceandbodymassindexaremoreaccuratethanwaisthipratiomodelofadiposedistributionandvisceraladiposityindex
AT franciscoalvarezblasco surrogatemarkersofvisceraladiposityinyoungadultswaistcircumferenceandbodymassindexaremoreaccuratethanwaisthipratiomodelofadiposedistributionandvisceraladiposityindex
AT manuelluqueramirez surrogatemarkersofvisceraladiposityinyoungadultswaistcircumferenceandbodymassindexaremoreaccuratethanwaisthipratiomodelofadiposedistributionandvisceraladiposityindex
AT hectorfescobarmorreale surrogatemarkersofvisceraladiposityinyoungadultswaistcircumferenceandbodymassindexaremoreaccuratethanwaisthipratiomodelofadiposedistributionandvisceraladiposityindex