Inclusive approaches for cumulative effects assessments

Abstract The cumulative impacts of human activities and natural disturbance are leading to loss and extinction of species, ecological communities and biocultural connections people have to those ecosystems. Exclusive and extractive western science methodologies often hinder the inclusion of Indigeno...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Megan S. Adams, Vivitskaia J. D. Tulloch, Jessie Hemphill, Briony Penn, Leya T. Anderson, Kate Davis, Stephanie Avery‐Gomm, Alex Harris, Tara G. Martin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-04-01
Series:People and Nature
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10447
_version_ 1797853462292070400
author Megan S. Adams
Vivitskaia J. D. Tulloch
Jessie Hemphill
Briony Penn
Leya T. Anderson
Kate Davis
Stephanie Avery‐Gomm
Alex Harris
Tara G. Martin
author_facet Megan S. Adams
Vivitskaia J. D. Tulloch
Jessie Hemphill
Briony Penn
Leya T. Anderson
Kate Davis
Stephanie Avery‐Gomm
Alex Harris
Tara G. Martin
author_sort Megan S. Adams
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The cumulative impacts of human activities and natural disturbance are leading to loss and extinction of species, ecological communities and biocultural connections people have to those ecosystems. Exclusive and extractive western science methodologies often hinder the inclusion of Indigenous knowledge holders in cumulative effects assessments (CEAs), which can lead to regional conflict and ineffective assessment and management of cumulative effects. We offer our reflections on the development of a collaborative CEA process with the Kitasoo Xai'xais, Nuxalk and Wuikinuxv First Nations in what is now known as the Central Coast of British Columbia. We designed our CEA around the guiding principles of respecting Indigenous sovereignty and regional autonomy, designing for trauma‐informed approaches, and prioritizing inclusivity and reciprocity. We focused our efforts on identifying current and future pressures on species of the Nations' choice. We relied on expert elicitation and data‐driven approaches to identify and map current and future cumulative impacts to predict their consequences for species' health. We used combinations of visualizations, numerical, oral and written materials to convey, elicit and share complex information with experts. We found a diversity of elicitation processes fostered the involvement of a variety of experts (e.g. Indigenous knowledge holders and Nation staff, regional biologists, Crown managers, tenure holders). We mapped over 90+ impacts to species in the region and after conversation and facilitated elicitation processes with over 50 knowledge holders, emerged with predictions for the consequences of seven plausible scenarios of future cumulative impacts for eight species as well as broad themes for the management of cumulative impacts to the lands and waters of the Nations with whom we collaborated. Our shared lessons can support researchers, planners, proponents, and Indigenous and colonial government agencies to conduct inclusive, collaborative and accessible CEAs that inform regional land and marine use planning. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T19:49:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8ca196a9d7f1412d9735f8be1528d4c5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2575-8314
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T19:49:56Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series People and Nature
spelling doaj.art-8ca196a9d7f1412d9735f8be1528d4c52023-04-03T08:43:59ZengWileyPeople and Nature2575-83142023-04-015243144510.1002/pan3.10447Inclusive approaches for cumulative effects assessmentsMegan S. Adams0Vivitskaia J. D. Tulloch1Jessie Hemphill2Briony Penn3Leya T. Anderson4Kate Davis5Stephanie Avery‐Gomm6Alex Harris7Tara G. Martin8University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia CanadaUniversity of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia CanadaAlderhill Planning Inc. Penticton British Columbia CanadaSchool of Environmental Studies University of Victoria Victoria British Columbia CanadaIndependent Artist Denman Island British Columbia CanadaAlderhill Planning Inc. Penticton British Columbia CanadaEnvironment and Climate Change Canada National Wildlife Research Centre Ottawa Ontario CanadaAlex Harris Photography Vancouver British Columbia CanadaUniversity of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia CanadaAbstract The cumulative impacts of human activities and natural disturbance are leading to loss and extinction of species, ecological communities and biocultural connections people have to those ecosystems. Exclusive and extractive western science methodologies often hinder the inclusion of Indigenous knowledge holders in cumulative effects assessments (CEAs), which can lead to regional conflict and ineffective assessment and management of cumulative effects. We offer our reflections on the development of a collaborative CEA process with the Kitasoo Xai'xais, Nuxalk and Wuikinuxv First Nations in what is now known as the Central Coast of British Columbia. We designed our CEA around the guiding principles of respecting Indigenous sovereignty and regional autonomy, designing for trauma‐informed approaches, and prioritizing inclusivity and reciprocity. We focused our efforts on identifying current and future pressures on species of the Nations' choice. We relied on expert elicitation and data‐driven approaches to identify and map current and future cumulative impacts to predict their consequences for species' health. We used combinations of visualizations, numerical, oral and written materials to convey, elicit and share complex information with experts. We found a diversity of elicitation processes fostered the involvement of a variety of experts (e.g. Indigenous knowledge holders and Nation staff, regional biologists, Crown managers, tenure holders). We mapped over 90+ impacts to species in the region and after conversation and facilitated elicitation processes with over 50 knowledge holders, emerged with predictions for the consequences of seven plausible scenarios of future cumulative impacts for eight species as well as broad themes for the management of cumulative impacts to the lands and waters of the Nations with whom we collaborated. Our shared lessons can support researchers, planners, proponents, and Indigenous and colonial government agencies to conduct inclusive, collaborative and accessible CEAs that inform regional land and marine use planning. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10447
spellingShingle Megan S. Adams
Vivitskaia J. D. Tulloch
Jessie Hemphill
Briony Penn
Leya T. Anderson
Kate Davis
Stephanie Avery‐Gomm
Alex Harris
Tara G. Martin
Inclusive approaches for cumulative effects assessments
People and Nature
title Inclusive approaches for cumulative effects assessments
title_full Inclusive approaches for cumulative effects assessments
title_fullStr Inclusive approaches for cumulative effects assessments
title_full_unstemmed Inclusive approaches for cumulative effects assessments
title_short Inclusive approaches for cumulative effects assessments
title_sort inclusive approaches for cumulative effects assessments
url https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10447
work_keys_str_mv AT megansadams inclusiveapproachesforcumulativeeffectsassessments
AT vivitskaiajdtulloch inclusiveapproachesforcumulativeeffectsassessments
AT jessiehemphill inclusiveapproachesforcumulativeeffectsassessments
AT brionypenn inclusiveapproachesforcumulativeeffectsassessments
AT leyatanderson inclusiveapproachesforcumulativeeffectsassessments
AT katedavis inclusiveapproachesforcumulativeeffectsassessments
AT stephanieaverygomm inclusiveapproachesforcumulativeeffectsassessments
AT alexharris inclusiveapproachesforcumulativeeffectsassessments
AT taragmartin inclusiveapproachesforcumulativeeffectsassessments