Professionalizing Pre-Service Biology Teachers’ Misconceptions about Learning and the Brain through Conceptual Change

Scientific concepts of learning and the brain are relevant for biology teachers in two ways: Firstly, the topic is an object of instruction (e.g., long-term potentiation). Secondly, biology teachers must guide their students towards sustainable learning. Consequently, their own understanding of lear...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Finja Grospietsch, Jürgen Mayer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-08-01
Series:Education Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/8/3/120
_version_ 1798039319233953792
author Finja Grospietsch
Jürgen Mayer
author_facet Finja Grospietsch
Jürgen Mayer
author_sort Finja Grospietsch
collection DOAJ
description Scientific concepts of learning and the brain are relevant for biology teachers in two ways: Firstly, the topic is an object of instruction (e.g., long-term potentiation). Secondly, biology teachers must guide their students towards sustainable learning. Consequently, their own understanding of learning and the brain has an especially far-reaching influence on students. Pre-service biology teachers endorse so-called “neuromyths,” misconceptions on the subject of learning and the brain (e.g., the existence of learning styles) even though they cover neuroscientific content during their studies. These misconceptions remain relatively stable throughout university education and practical training. In this paper, we transfer the teaching and learning model of conceptual change to the university context. We investigate whether and to what extent a university course developed in accordance with a professional conceptual change model can reduce pre-service biology teachers’ endorsement of neuromyths. In a pre-post-design, 57 university students were asked about their professional knowledge, beliefs, neuromyths, and perception and utilization of the university course. We found a positive effect of the intervention on all three elements of students’ conceptual understanding. The results show that explicitly refuting misconceptions about learning and the brain (e.g., via conceptual change texts) helps to professionalize neuromyths.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T21:52:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8ca58c28f2f8404a8a3e19aebe060b55
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-7102
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T21:52:15Z
publishDate 2018-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Education Sciences
spelling doaj.art-8ca58c28f2f8404a8a3e19aebe060b552022-12-22T04:01:12ZengMDPI AGEducation Sciences2227-71022018-08-018312010.3390/educsci8030120educsci8030120Professionalizing Pre-Service Biology Teachers’ Misconceptions about Learning and the Brain through Conceptual ChangeFinja Grospietsch0Jürgen Mayer1Institute for Biology, Biology Education, University of Kassel, Kassel 34119, GermanyInstitute for Biology, Biology Education, University of Kassel, Kassel 34119, GermanyScientific concepts of learning and the brain are relevant for biology teachers in two ways: Firstly, the topic is an object of instruction (e.g., long-term potentiation). Secondly, biology teachers must guide their students towards sustainable learning. Consequently, their own understanding of learning and the brain has an especially far-reaching influence on students. Pre-service biology teachers endorse so-called “neuromyths,” misconceptions on the subject of learning and the brain (e.g., the existence of learning styles) even though they cover neuroscientific content during their studies. These misconceptions remain relatively stable throughout university education and practical training. In this paper, we transfer the teaching and learning model of conceptual change to the university context. We investigate whether and to what extent a university course developed in accordance with a professional conceptual change model can reduce pre-service biology teachers’ endorsement of neuromyths. In a pre-post-design, 57 university students were asked about their professional knowledge, beliefs, neuromyths, and perception and utilization of the university course. We found a positive effect of the intervention on all three elements of students’ conceptual understanding. The results show that explicitly refuting misconceptions about learning and the brain (e.g., via conceptual change texts) helps to professionalize neuromyths.http://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/8/3/120conceptual changebiology teacher educationpre-service biology teachersprofessional knowledgebeliefsmisconceptionsneuromythslearningthe brain
spellingShingle Finja Grospietsch
Jürgen Mayer
Professionalizing Pre-Service Biology Teachers’ Misconceptions about Learning and the Brain through Conceptual Change
Education Sciences
conceptual change
biology teacher education
pre-service biology teachers
professional knowledge
beliefs
misconceptions
neuromyths
learning
the brain
title Professionalizing Pre-Service Biology Teachers’ Misconceptions about Learning and the Brain through Conceptual Change
title_full Professionalizing Pre-Service Biology Teachers’ Misconceptions about Learning and the Brain through Conceptual Change
title_fullStr Professionalizing Pre-Service Biology Teachers’ Misconceptions about Learning and the Brain through Conceptual Change
title_full_unstemmed Professionalizing Pre-Service Biology Teachers’ Misconceptions about Learning and the Brain through Conceptual Change
title_short Professionalizing Pre-Service Biology Teachers’ Misconceptions about Learning and the Brain through Conceptual Change
title_sort professionalizing pre service biology teachers misconceptions about learning and the brain through conceptual change
topic conceptual change
biology teacher education
pre-service biology teachers
professional knowledge
beliefs
misconceptions
neuromyths
learning
the brain
url http://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/8/3/120
work_keys_str_mv AT finjagrospietsch professionalizingpreservicebiologyteachersmisconceptionsaboutlearningandthebrainthroughconceptualchange
AT jurgenmayer professionalizingpreservicebiologyteachersmisconceptionsaboutlearningandthebrainthroughconceptualchange