Effectiveness of Percutaneous Ethanol Injection Therapy Compared to Parathyroidectomy in the Management of Secondary and Tertiary Hyperparathyroidism

Background: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) and tertiary hyperparathyroidism (THPT) are a common complication of chronic renal failure. Percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (PEIT) has been used as alternative to surgery, but its effectiveness is inconsistent. Objectives: The objective of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Inmutto Nakarin, Srisuwan Tanop, Kattipatanapong Thanate, Pochan Prach
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2019-01-01
Series:The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.4103/AJIR.AJIR_37_18
Description
Summary:Background: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) and tertiary hyperparathyroidism (THPT) are a common complication of chronic renal failure. Percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (PEIT) has been used as alternative to surgery, but its effectiveness is inconsistent. Objectives: The objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of PEIT in the management of patients with SHPT and THPT. Materials and Methods: Ninety-one patients with chronic renal failure and SHPT or THPT were treated with PEIT (n = 55) and surgery (n = 36) between January 2006 and July 2015. The medical records, imaging studies, and ablation techniques were reviewed to assess the efficacy of each treatment modality and complications. Results: Parathyroid hormone (PTH) level after treatment <160 pg/mL was used to indicate success of treatment. PEIT showed lower effectiveness compared to surgery (1.8% vs. 61.1%). There was no complication in PEIT group. Symptomatic hypocalcemia was found 11.1% in surgery group. Conclusion: PEIT in treatment of secondary and THPT was much less effective than surgery due to large nodule sizes, high levels of PTH, and multiple parathyroid nodules.
ISSN:2542-7075
2542-7083