Efficacy of remote ischaemic preconditioning on outcomes following non-cardiac non-vascular surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been investigated as a simple intervention to potentially mitigate the ischaemic effect of the surgical insult and reduce postoperative morbidity. This review systematically evaluates the effect of RIPC on morbidity, including duration...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aikaterini Papadopoulou, Matthew Dickinson, Theophilus L. Samuels, Christian Heiss, Lui Forni, Ben Creagh-Brown
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-04-01
Series:Perioperative Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-023-00297-0
_version_ 1797845822719655936
author Aikaterini Papadopoulou
Matthew Dickinson
Theophilus L. Samuels
Christian Heiss
Lui Forni
Ben Creagh-Brown
author_facet Aikaterini Papadopoulou
Matthew Dickinson
Theophilus L. Samuels
Christian Heiss
Lui Forni
Ben Creagh-Brown
author_sort Aikaterini Papadopoulou
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been investigated as a simple intervention to potentially mitigate the ischaemic effect of the surgical insult and reduce postoperative morbidity. This review systematically evaluates the effect of RIPC on morbidity, including duration of hospital stay and parameters reflective of cardiac, renal, respiratory, and hepatic dysfunction following non-cardiac non-vascular (NCNV) surgery. Methods The electronic databases PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched from their inception date to November 2021. Studies investigating the effect of local preconditioning or postconditioning were excluded. Methodological quality and risk of bias were determined according to the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2). Calculation of the odds ratios and a random effects model was used for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences or standardised mean differences as appropriate were used for continuous outcomes. The primary outcomes of interest were cardiac and renal morbidity, and the secondary outcomes included other organ function parameters and hospital length of stay. Results A systematic review of the published literature identified 36 randomised controlled trials. There was no significant difference in postoperative troponin or acute kidney injury. RIPC was associated with lower postoperative serum creatinine (9 studies, 914 patients, mean difference (MD) - 3.81 µmol/L, 95% confidence interval (CI) - 6.79 to - 0.83, p = 0.01, I 2 = 5%) and lower renal stress biomarker (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), 5 studies, 379 patients, standardized mean difference (SMD) - 0.66, 95% CI - 1.27 to - 0.06, p = 0.03, I 2 = 86%). RIPC was also associated with improved oxygenation (higher PaO2/FiO2, 5 studies, 420 patients, MD 51.51 mmHg, 95% CI 27.32 to 75.69, p < 0.01, I 2 = 89%), lower biomarker of oxidative stress (malondialdehyde (MDA), 3 studies, 100 patients, MD - 1.24 µmol/L, 95% CI - 2.4 to - 0.07, p = 0.04, I 2 = 91%)) and shorter length of hospital stay (15 studies, 2110 patients, MD - 0.99 days, 95% CI - 1.75 to - 0.23, p = 0.01, I 2 = 88%). Conclusions This meta-analysis did not show an improvement in the primary outcomes of interest with the use of RIPC. RIPC was associated with a small improvement in certain surrogate parameters of organ function and small reduction in hospital length of stay. Our results should be interpreted with caution due to the limited number of studies addressing individual outcomes and the considerable heterogeneity identified. Trial registration PROSPERO CRD42019129503.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T17:46:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8ca8fbb85f1e4b9f89fe12d5c9dbcc46
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-0525
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T17:46:13Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Perioperative Medicine
spelling doaj.art-8ca8fbb85f1e4b9f89fe12d5c9dbcc462023-04-16T11:20:32ZengBMCPerioperative Medicine2047-05252023-04-0112111210.1186/s13741-023-00297-0Efficacy of remote ischaemic preconditioning on outcomes following non-cardiac non-vascular surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysisAikaterini Papadopoulou0Matthew Dickinson1Theophilus L. Samuels2Christian Heiss3Lui Forni4Ben Creagh-Brown5Department of Anesthesia, King’s College HospitalDepartment of Anesthesia, Royal Surrey County HospitalDepartment of Critical Care, Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS TrustVascular Department, Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS TrustDepartment of Critical Care, Royal Surrey County HospitalDepartment of Critical Care, Royal Surrey County HospitalAbstract Background Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been investigated as a simple intervention to potentially mitigate the ischaemic effect of the surgical insult and reduce postoperative morbidity. This review systematically evaluates the effect of RIPC on morbidity, including duration of hospital stay and parameters reflective of cardiac, renal, respiratory, and hepatic dysfunction following non-cardiac non-vascular (NCNV) surgery. Methods The electronic databases PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched from their inception date to November 2021. Studies investigating the effect of local preconditioning or postconditioning were excluded. Methodological quality and risk of bias were determined according to the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2). Calculation of the odds ratios and a random effects model was used for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences or standardised mean differences as appropriate were used for continuous outcomes. The primary outcomes of interest were cardiac and renal morbidity, and the secondary outcomes included other organ function parameters and hospital length of stay. Results A systematic review of the published literature identified 36 randomised controlled trials. There was no significant difference in postoperative troponin or acute kidney injury. RIPC was associated with lower postoperative serum creatinine (9 studies, 914 patients, mean difference (MD) - 3.81 µmol/L, 95% confidence interval (CI) - 6.79 to - 0.83, p = 0.01, I 2 = 5%) and lower renal stress biomarker (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), 5 studies, 379 patients, standardized mean difference (SMD) - 0.66, 95% CI - 1.27 to - 0.06, p = 0.03, I 2 = 86%). RIPC was also associated with improved oxygenation (higher PaO2/FiO2, 5 studies, 420 patients, MD 51.51 mmHg, 95% CI 27.32 to 75.69, p < 0.01, I 2 = 89%), lower biomarker of oxidative stress (malondialdehyde (MDA), 3 studies, 100 patients, MD - 1.24 µmol/L, 95% CI - 2.4 to - 0.07, p = 0.04, I 2 = 91%)) and shorter length of hospital stay (15 studies, 2110 patients, MD - 0.99 days, 95% CI - 1.75 to - 0.23, p = 0.01, I 2 = 88%). Conclusions This meta-analysis did not show an improvement in the primary outcomes of interest with the use of RIPC. RIPC was associated with a small improvement in certain surrogate parameters of organ function and small reduction in hospital length of stay. Our results should be interpreted with caution due to the limited number of studies addressing individual outcomes and the considerable heterogeneity identified. Trial registration PROSPERO CRD42019129503.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-023-00297-0Ischaemic preconditioningNon-cardiac surgeryPostoperative acute kidney injuryPostoperative morbidityPostoperative myocardial injuryPostoperative troponin
spellingShingle Aikaterini Papadopoulou
Matthew Dickinson
Theophilus L. Samuels
Christian Heiss
Lui Forni
Ben Creagh-Brown
Efficacy of remote ischaemic preconditioning on outcomes following non-cardiac non-vascular surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Perioperative Medicine
Ischaemic preconditioning
Non-cardiac surgery
Postoperative acute kidney injury
Postoperative morbidity
Postoperative myocardial injury
Postoperative troponin
title Efficacy of remote ischaemic preconditioning on outcomes following non-cardiac non-vascular surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy of remote ischaemic preconditioning on outcomes following non-cardiac non-vascular surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy of remote ischaemic preconditioning on outcomes following non-cardiac non-vascular surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of remote ischaemic preconditioning on outcomes following non-cardiac non-vascular surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy of remote ischaemic preconditioning on outcomes following non-cardiac non-vascular surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy of remote ischaemic preconditioning on outcomes following non cardiac non vascular surgery a systematic review and meta analysis
topic Ischaemic preconditioning
Non-cardiac surgery
Postoperative acute kidney injury
Postoperative morbidity
Postoperative myocardial injury
Postoperative troponin
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-023-00297-0
work_keys_str_mv AT aikaterinipapadopoulou efficacyofremoteischaemicpreconditioningonoutcomesfollowingnoncardiacnonvascularsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT matthewdickinson efficacyofremoteischaemicpreconditioningonoutcomesfollowingnoncardiacnonvascularsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT theophiluslsamuels efficacyofremoteischaemicpreconditioningonoutcomesfollowingnoncardiacnonvascularsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT christianheiss efficacyofremoteischaemicpreconditioningonoutcomesfollowingnoncardiacnonvascularsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT luiforni efficacyofremoteischaemicpreconditioningonoutcomesfollowingnoncardiacnonvascularsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bencreaghbrown efficacyofremoteischaemicpreconditioningonoutcomesfollowingnoncardiacnonvascularsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis