What's the catch? Profiling the benefits and costs associated with marine protected areas and displaced fishing in the Scotia Sea.
Both costs and benefits must be considered when implementing marine protected areas (MPAs), particularly those associated with fishing effort displaced by potential closures. The Southern Ocean offers a case study in understanding such tradeoffs, where MPAs are actively being discussed to achieve a...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237425 |
| _version_ | 1818583940226613248 |
|---|---|
| author | Emily S Klein George M Watters |
| author_facet | Emily S Klein George M Watters |
| author_sort | Emily S Klein |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Both costs and benefits must be considered when implementing marine protected areas (MPAs), particularly those associated with fishing effort displaced by potential closures. The Southern Ocean offers a case study in understanding such tradeoffs, where MPAs are actively being discussed to achieve a range of protection and sustainable use objectives. Here, we evaluated the possible impacts of two MPA scenarios on the Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) fishery and krill-dependent predators in the Scotia Sea, explicitly addressing the displacement of fishing from closed areas. For both scenarios, we employed a minimally realistic, spatially explicit ecosystem model and considered three alternative redistributions of displaced fishing. We projected both MPAs to provide positive outcomes for many krill-dependent predators, especially when closed areas included at least 50-75% of their foraging distributions. Further, differences between the scenarios suggest ways to improve seal and penguin protection in the Scotia Sea. MPA scenarios also projected increases in total fishery yields, but alongside risks of fishing in areas where relatively low krill densities could cause the fishery to suspend operations. The three alternatives for redistributing displaced fishing had little effect on benefits to predators, but did matter for the fishery, with greater differences in overall catch and risk of fishing in areas of low krill density when displaced fishing was redistributed evenly among the open areas. Collectively, results suggest a well-designed MPA in the Scotia Sea may protect krill-dependent predators, even with displaced fishing, and preclude further spatial management of the krill fishery outside the MPA. More broadly, outcomes denote the importance of delineating fishing and predator habitat, spatial scales, and the critical trade-offs inherent in MPA development. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-16T08:13:16Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-8ca9ba150bad49dfbf17a95f64a0dcf9 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-16T08:13:16Z |
| publishDate | 2020-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-8ca9ba150bad49dfbf17a95f64a0dcf92022-12-21T22:38:19ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01158e023742510.1371/journal.pone.0237425What's the catch? Profiling the benefits and costs associated with marine protected areas and displaced fishing in the Scotia Sea.Emily S KleinGeorge M WattersBoth costs and benefits must be considered when implementing marine protected areas (MPAs), particularly those associated with fishing effort displaced by potential closures. The Southern Ocean offers a case study in understanding such tradeoffs, where MPAs are actively being discussed to achieve a range of protection and sustainable use objectives. Here, we evaluated the possible impacts of two MPA scenarios on the Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) fishery and krill-dependent predators in the Scotia Sea, explicitly addressing the displacement of fishing from closed areas. For both scenarios, we employed a minimally realistic, spatially explicit ecosystem model and considered three alternative redistributions of displaced fishing. We projected both MPAs to provide positive outcomes for many krill-dependent predators, especially when closed areas included at least 50-75% of their foraging distributions. Further, differences between the scenarios suggest ways to improve seal and penguin protection in the Scotia Sea. MPA scenarios also projected increases in total fishery yields, but alongside risks of fishing in areas where relatively low krill densities could cause the fishery to suspend operations. The three alternatives for redistributing displaced fishing had little effect on benefits to predators, but did matter for the fishery, with greater differences in overall catch and risk of fishing in areas of low krill density when displaced fishing was redistributed evenly among the open areas. Collectively, results suggest a well-designed MPA in the Scotia Sea may protect krill-dependent predators, even with displaced fishing, and preclude further spatial management of the krill fishery outside the MPA. More broadly, outcomes denote the importance of delineating fishing and predator habitat, spatial scales, and the critical trade-offs inherent in MPA development.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237425 |
| spellingShingle | Emily S Klein George M Watters What's the catch? Profiling the benefits and costs associated with marine protected areas and displaced fishing in the Scotia Sea. PLoS ONE |
| title | What's the catch? Profiling the benefits and costs associated with marine protected areas and displaced fishing in the Scotia Sea. |
| title_full | What's the catch? Profiling the benefits and costs associated with marine protected areas and displaced fishing in the Scotia Sea. |
| title_fullStr | What's the catch? Profiling the benefits and costs associated with marine protected areas and displaced fishing in the Scotia Sea. |
| title_full_unstemmed | What's the catch? Profiling the benefits and costs associated with marine protected areas and displaced fishing in the Scotia Sea. |
| title_short | What's the catch? Profiling the benefits and costs associated with marine protected areas and displaced fishing in the Scotia Sea. |
| title_sort | what s the catch profiling the benefits and costs associated with marine protected areas and displaced fishing in the scotia sea |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237425 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT emilysklein whatsthecatchprofilingthebenefitsandcostsassociatedwithmarineprotectedareasanddisplacedfishinginthescotiasea AT georgemwatters whatsthecatchprofilingthebenefitsandcostsassociatedwithmarineprotectedareasanddisplacedfishinginthescotiasea |