Ionizing radiation and volumetric mammographic density

Objectives Mammographic density (MD) refers to the percentage of dense tissue of an entire breast and was proposed to be used as a surrogate marker for breast cancer. High-dose ionizing radiation (IR) has been recognized as a breast cancer risk factor. The aim of our study was to investigate associa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Beata Pepłońska, Mateusz Mirowski, Paweł Kałużny, Joanna Domienik-Andrzejewska
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine 2022-08-01
Series:International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ijomeh.eu/Ionizing-radiation-and-volumetric-mammographic-density,150294,0,2.html
_version_ 1797980752072146944
author Beata Pepłońska
Mateusz Mirowski
Paweł Kałużny
Joanna Domienik-Andrzejewska
author_facet Beata Pepłońska
Mateusz Mirowski
Paweł Kałużny
Joanna Domienik-Andrzejewska
author_sort Beata Pepłońska
collection DOAJ
description Objectives Mammographic density (MD) refers to the percentage of dense tissue of an entire breast and was proposed to be used as a surrogate marker for breast cancer. High-dose ionizing radiation (IR) has been recognized as a breast cancer risk factor. The aim of our study was to investigate association between lifetime low dose ionizing radiation (LDIR) and MD. Material and Methods A cross-sectional study included 467 women aged 40–60 years who underwent screening mammography in Łódź, Poland. The digital mammography examination of the breasts included both craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique views. The volumetric breast density (VBD) (%) and fibrograndular tissue volume (FG) (cm 3 ) were determined based on the analysis of mammographic image (“for processing”) using Volpara Imaging Software. The exposure to IR was estimated for each individual, based on the data from interviews about diagnostic or therapeutic medical procedures performed in the area of the neck, chest, abdomen and spine, which involved X-rays and γ rays and the data about the doses derived from literature. Linear and logistic regression were fitted with VBD and FG as the outcomes and organ breast dose, effective dose and number of mammographies as the determinants, adjusted for major confounders. Results The analyses showed no association between VBD or FG and the breast organ dose or the effective dose. The only significant finding observed concerned the association between the number of mammographies and the FG volume with β coefficient: 0.028 (95% CI: 0.012–0.043), and predicted mean FG volume >13.4 cm3 among the women with >3 mammographies when compared to those with none. Conclusions This study does not, in general, provide support for the positive association between LDIR and MD. The weak association of the FG volume with the number of mammographies warrants further verification in larger independent studies. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2022;35(5):635–49
first_indexed 2024-04-11T05:59:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8cb3424cb4b74a9b8d1cb38c6e423cd5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1232-1087
1896-494X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T05:59:54Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine
record_format Article
series International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health
spelling doaj.art-8cb3424cb4b74a9b8d1cb38c6e423cd52022-12-22T04:41:47ZengNofer Institute of Occupational MedicineInternational Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health1232-10871896-494X2022-08-0135563564910.13075/ijomeh.1896.01916150294Ionizing radiation and volumetric mammographic densityBeata Pepłońska0Mateusz Mirowski1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3523-7652Paweł Kałużny2Joanna Domienik-Andrzejewska3Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Łódź, Poland (Department of Environmental Epidemiology)Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Łódź, Poland (Department of Radiation Protection)Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Łódź, Poland (Department of Environmental Epidemiology)Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Łódź, Poland (Department of Radiation Protection)Objectives Mammographic density (MD) refers to the percentage of dense tissue of an entire breast and was proposed to be used as a surrogate marker for breast cancer. High-dose ionizing radiation (IR) has been recognized as a breast cancer risk factor. The aim of our study was to investigate association between lifetime low dose ionizing radiation (LDIR) and MD. Material and Methods A cross-sectional study included 467 women aged 40–60 years who underwent screening mammography in Łódź, Poland. The digital mammography examination of the breasts included both craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique views. The volumetric breast density (VBD) (%) and fibrograndular tissue volume (FG) (cm 3 ) were determined based on the analysis of mammographic image (“for processing”) using Volpara Imaging Software. The exposure to IR was estimated for each individual, based on the data from interviews about diagnostic or therapeutic medical procedures performed in the area of the neck, chest, abdomen and spine, which involved X-rays and γ rays and the data about the doses derived from literature. Linear and logistic regression were fitted with VBD and FG as the outcomes and organ breast dose, effective dose and number of mammographies as the determinants, adjusted for major confounders. Results The analyses showed no association between VBD or FG and the breast organ dose or the effective dose. The only significant finding observed concerned the association between the number of mammographies and the FG volume with β coefficient: 0.028 (95% CI: 0.012–0.043), and predicted mean FG volume >13.4 cm3 among the women with >3 mammographies when compared to those with none. Conclusions This study does not, in general, provide support for the positive association between LDIR and MD. The weak association of the FG volume with the number of mammographies warrants further verification in larger independent studies. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2022;35(5):635–49http://ijomeh.eu/Ionizing-radiation-and-volumetric-mammographic-density,150294,0,2.htmlbreast cancerionizing radiationmammographyeffective dosemammographic densityorgan dose
spellingShingle Beata Pepłońska
Mateusz Mirowski
Paweł Kałużny
Joanna Domienik-Andrzejewska
Ionizing radiation and volumetric mammographic density
International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health
breast cancer
ionizing radiation
mammography
effective dose
mammographic density
organ dose
title Ionizing radiation and volumetric mammographic density
title_full Ionizing radiation and volumetric mammographic density
title_fullStr Ionizing radiation and volumetric mammographic density
title_full_unstemmed Ionizing radiation and volumetric mammographic density
title_short Ionizing radiation and volumetric mammographic density
title_sort ionizing radiation and volumetric mammographic density
topic breast cancer
ionizing radiation
mammography
effective dose
mammographic density
organ dose
url http://ijomeh.eu/Ionizing-radiation-and-volumetric-mammographic-density,150294,0,2.html
work_keys_str_mv AT beatapepłonska ionizingradiationandvolumetricmammographicdensity
AT mateuszmirowski ionizingradiationandvolumetricmammographicdensity
AT pawełkałuzny ionizingradiationandvolumetricmammographicdensity
AT joannadomienikandrzejewska ionizingradiationandvolumetricmammographicdensity