Is altering the availability of healthier vs. less-healthy options effective across socioeconomic groups? A mega-analysis

Abstract Background Availability interventions have been hypothesised to make limited demands on conscious processes and, as a result, to be less likely to generate health inequalities than cognitively-oriented interventions. Here we synthesise existing evidence to examine whether the impact of alte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rachel Pechey, Gareth J. Hollands, James P. Reynolds, Susan A. Jebb, Theresa M. Marteau
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-07-01
Series:International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-022-01315-y
_version_ 1828784784905601024
author Rachel Pechey
Gareth J. Hollands
James P. Reynolds
Susan A. Jebb
Theresa M. Marteau
author_facet Rachel Pechey
Gareth J. Hollands
James P. Reynolds
Susan A. Jebb
Theresa M. Marteau
author_sort Rachel Pechey
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Availability interventions have been hypothesised to make limited demands on conscious processes and, as a result, to be less likely to generate health inequalities than cognitively-oriented interventions. Here we synthesise existing evidence to examine whether the impact of altering the availability of healthier vs. less-healthy options differs by socioeconomic position. Methods Individual-level data (21,360 observations from 7,375 participants) from six studies (conducted online (n = 4) and in laboratories (n = 2)) were pooled for mega-analysis. Multilevel logistic regressions analysed the impact of altering the availability of healthier options on selection of a healthier (rather than a less-healthy) option by socioeconomic position, assessed by (a) education and (b) income. Results Participants had over threefold higher odds of selecting a healthier option when the available range was predominantly healthier compared to selections when the range offered was predominantly less-healthy (odds ratio (OR): 3.8; 95%CIs: 3.5, 4.1). Less educated participants were less likely to select healthier options in each availability condition (ORs: 0.75–0.85; all p < 0.005), but there was no evidence of differences in healthier option selection by income. Compared to selections when the range offered was predominantly less-healthy, when predominantly healthier options were available there was a 31% increase in selecting healthier options for the most educated group vs 27% for the least educated. This modest degree of increased responsiveness in the most educated group appeared only to occur when healthier options were predominant. There was no evidence of any differential response to the intervention by income. Conclusion Increasing the proportion of healthier options available increases the selection of healthier options across socioeconomic positions. Availability interventions may have a slightly larger beneficial effect on those with the highest levels of education in settings when healthier options predominate.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T23:37:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8cbbbaf3e20a43b58fe96f68a4b6ec44
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1479-5868
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T23:37:52Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
spelling doaj.art-8cbbbaf3e20a43b58fe96f68a4b6ec442022-12-22T00:45:49ZengBMCInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity1479-58682022-07-0119111010.1186/s12966-022-01315-yIs altering the availability of healthier vs. less-healthy options effective across socioeconomic groups? A mega-analysisRachel Pechey0Gareth J. Hollands1James P. Reynolds2Susan A. Jebb3Theresa M. Marteau4Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of OxfordDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of CambridgeSchool of Psychology, Aston UniversityNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of OxfordDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of CambridgeAbstract Background Availability interventions have been hypothesised to make limited demands on conscious processes and, as a result, to be less likely to generate health inequalities than cognitively-oriented interventions. Here we synthesise existing evidence to examine whether the impact of altering the availability of healthier vs. less-healthy options differs by socioeconomic position. Methods Individual-level data (21,360 observations from 7,375 participants) from six studies (conducted online (n = 4) and in laboratories (n = 2)) were pooled for mega-analysis. Multilevel logistic regressions analysed the impact of altering the availability of healthier options on selection of a healthier (rather than a less-healthy) option by socioeconomic position, assessed by (a) education and (b) income. Results Participants had over threefold higher odds of selecting a healthier option when the available range was predominantly healthier compared to selections when the range offered was predominantly less-healthy (odds ratio (OR): 3.8; 95%CIs: 3.5, 4.1). Less educated participants were less likely to select healthier options in each availability condition (ORs: 0.75–0.85; all p < 0.005), but there was no evidence of differences in healthier option selection by income. Compared to selections when the range offered was predominantly less-healthy, when predominantly healthier options were available there was a 31% increase in selecting healthier options for the most educated group vs 27% for the least educated. This modest degree of increased responsiveness in the most educated group appeared only to occur when healthier options were predominant. There was no evidence of any differential response to the intervention by income. Conclusion Increasing the proportion of healthier options available increases the selection of healthier options across socioeconomic positions. Availability interventions may have a slightly larger beneficial effect on those with the highest levels of education in settings when healthier options predominate.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-022-01315-yAvailabilityIntervention-generated inequalitiesHealth inequalitiesSocioeconomic positionFood
spellingShingle Rachel Pechey
Gareth J. Hollands
James P. Reynolds
Susan A. Jebb
Theresa M. Marteau
Is altering the availability of healthier vs. less-healthy options effective across socioeconomic groups? A mega-analysis
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Availability
Intervention-generated inequalities
Health inequalities
Socioeconomic position
Food
title Is altering the availability of healthier vs. less-healthy options effective across socioeconomic groups? A mega-analysis
title_full Is altering the availability of healthier vs. less-healthy options effective across socioeconomic groups? A mega-analysis
title_fullStr Is altering the availability of healthier vs. less-healthy options effective across socioeconomic groups? A mega-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Is altering the availability of healthier vs. less-healthy options effective across socioeconomic groups? A mega-analysis
title_short Is altering the availability of healthier vs. less-healthy options effective across socioeconomic groups? A mega-analysis
title_sort is altering the availability of healthier vs less healthy options effective across socioeconomic groups a mega analysis
topic Availability
Intervention-generated inequalities
Health inequalities
Socioeconomic position
Food
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-022-01315-y
work_keys_str_mv AT rachelpechey isalteringtheavailabilityofhealthiervslesshealthyoptionseffectiveacrosssocioeconomicgroupsamegaanalysis
AT garethjhollands isalteringtheavailabilityofhealthiervslesshealthyoptionseffectiveacrosssocioeconomicgroupsamegaanalysis
AT jamespreynolds isalteringtheavailabilityofhealthiervslesshealthyoptionseffectiveacrosssocioeconomicgroupsamegaanalysis
AT susanajebb isalteringtheavailabilityofhealthiervslesshealthyoptionseffectiveacrosssocioeconomicgroupsamegaanalysis
AT theresammarteau isalteringtheavailabilityofhealthiervslesshealthyoptionseffectiveacrosssocioeconomicgroupsamegaanalysis