The Politics of Terrorism: Power, Legitimacy, and Violence

This paper examines and juxtaposes discourses about terrorism, violence, and political leadership. It presents generalizations about terrorism—a form of political violence by, for, and against the state—and politics and violence based on the theories of Max Weber and Hannah Arendt. The stark contras...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Richard A. Couto
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: ARINA, Inc. 2010-03-01
Series:Integral Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://integral-review.org/pdf-template-issue.php?pdfName=vol_6_no_1_couto_the_politics_of_terrorism.pdf
_version_ 1818447585431519232
author Richard A. Couto
author_facet Richard A. Couto
author_sort Richard A. Couto
collection DOAJ
description This paper examines and juxtaposes discourses about terrorism, violence, and political leadership. It presents generalizations about terrorism—a form of political violence by, for, and against the state—and politics and violence based on the theories of Max Weber and Hannah Arendt. The stark contrasts drawn from these theories include power as non-violent strength (Arendt) versus power as violence-dependent (Weber) and the struggle for legitimacy between different agents (states and individuals) as well as terrorism by, for, and against the state. This reframing of power leads to judging a lack of power where there is violence, and the presence of power where one observes non-violence. An examination of political and criminal violence leads to questions about deliberate and purposeful violence, indirect and structural violence that has political consequences, and their relationship to terrorism. It expands the application of terrorism to include indirect structural violence by indicating its relationship to direct violence, not only in traditionally-viewed terrorist action but in the ignored terror of, for example, inner cities. Terrorism has many forms by many actors. To synthesize the results of these lines of reasoning leads to a conclusion with considerable implications for politics and for political leadership. The politics of terrorism suggest a central counter-terrorist approach: de-politicizing the violence of terrorists whenever possible and using the authority and power of the state to institutionalize it as criminal violence. This, in turn, also means politicizing other forms of violence, such as capital punishment, and their indirect and structural forms, such as the inner city.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T20:05:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8cbfc8868779443b9cfa03ca2ceadde1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1553-3069
1553-3069
language deu
last_indexed 2024-12-14T20:05:57Z
publishDate 2010-03-01
publisher ARINA, Inc.
record_format Article
series Integral Review
spelling doaj.art-8cbfc8868779443b9cfa03ca2ceadde12022-12-21T22:49:02ZdeuARINA, Inc.Integral Review1553-30691553-30692010-03-01616381The Politics of Terrorism: Power, Legitimacy, and ViolenceRichard A. CoutoThis paper examines and juxtaposes discourses about terrorism, violence, and political leadership. It presents generalizations about terrorism—a form of political violence by, for, and against the state—and politics and violence based on the theories of Max Weber and Hannah Arendt. The stark contrasts drawn from these theories include power as non-violent strength (Arendt) versus power as violence-dependent (Weber) and the struggle for legitimacy between different agents (states and individuals) as well as terrorism by, for, and against the state. This reframing of power leads to judging a lack of power where there is violence, and the presence of power where one observes non-violence. An examination of political and criminal violence leads to questions about deliberate and purposeful violence, indirect and structural violence that has political consequences, and their relationship to terrorism. It expands the application of terrorism to include indirect structural violence by indicating its relationship to direct violence, not only in traditionally-viewed terrorist action but in the ignored terror of, for example, inner cities. Terrorism has many forms by many actors. To synthesize the results of these lines of reasoning leads to a conclusion with considerable implications for politics and for political leadership. The politics of terrorism suggest a central counter-terrorist approach: de-politicizing the violence of terrorists whenever possible and using the authority and power of the state to institutionalize it as criminal violence. This, in turn, also means politicizing other forms of violence, such as capital punishment, and their indirect and structural forms, such as the inner city.http://integral-review.org/pdf-template-issue.php?pdfName=vol_6_no_1_couto_the_politics_of_terrorism.pdfpoliticsRichard A. CoutoArendtcriminalizepolitical leadershippolitical terrorismpolitical violencestate violencestructural violenceterrorismwar on terrorWeber.
spellingShingle Richard A. Couto
The Politics of Terrorism: Power, Legitimacy, and Violence
Integral Review
politics
Richard A. Couto
Arendt
criminalize
political leadership
political terrorism
political violence
state violence
structural violence
terrorism
war on terror
Weber.
title The Politics of Terrorism: Power, Legitimacy, and Violence
title_full The Politics of Terrorism: Power, Legitimacy, and Violence
title_fullStr The Politics of Terrorism: Power, Legitimacy, and Violence
title_full_unstemmed The Politics of Terrorism: Power, Legitimacy, and Violence
title_short The Politics of Terrorism: Power, Legitimacy, and Violence
title_sort politics of terrorism power legitimacy and violence
topic politics
Richard A. Couto
Arendt
criminalize
political leadership
political terrorism
political violence
state violence
structural violence
terrorism
war on terror
Weber.
url http://integral-review.org/pdf-template-issue.php?pdfName=vol_6_no_1_couto_the_politics_of_terrorism.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT richardacouto thepoliticsofterrorismpowerlegitimacyandviolence
AT richardacouto politicsofterrorismpowerlegitimacyandviolence