A prospective study on the effectiveness of a combination regime (Mifepristone and Misoprostol) in comparison with Misoprostol for missed abortion

Introduction: Misoprostol is widely used in the medical management of missed abortions. However, pretreatment with Mifepristone has shown to be effective but still not recommended to be used in missed abortions. Aims and Objectives: To compare the outcome of medically managed missed abortion or blig...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nidhi Gupta, Reva Tripathi, Sumedha Sharma, Aruna Nigam, Sanjeet Panesar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2023-10-01
Series:Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_503_23
_version_ 1826982585500172288
author Nidhi Gupta
Reva Tripathi
Sumedha Sharma
Aruna Nigam
Sanjeet Panesar
author_facet Nidhi Gupta
Reva Tripathi
Sumedha Sharma
Aruna Nigam
Sanjeet Panesar
author_sort Nidhi Gupta
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Misoprostol is widely used in the medical management of missed abortions. However, pretreatment with Mifepristone has shown to be effective but still not recommended to be used in missed abortions. Aims and Objectives: To compare the outcome of medically managed missed abortion or blighted ovum using combination regime (Mifepristone and Misoprostol) vs Misoprostol alone. Materials and Methods: It was a prospective single-centre study performed in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, HIMSR and HAHC hospital, New Delhi, over, for one year. All the patients with diagnosed missed abortions were randomized into two groups (Group A and Group B). Group A was given Mifepristone 200 mg orally followed by Misoprostol 800 microgram per vaginal. Group B was given Misoprostol 800 microgram per vaginal. All the patients were observed for 24 hours for the expulsion of products of conception following the given regime. Ethical approval was taken from the Institutional Ethical Committee. Results: Both groups were comparable in demographic characteristics. On applying Fisher’s exact test, it has been observed that the odds of nonexpulsion of the product of conception, time taken in expulsion, and surgical evacuation because of excessive bleeding were significantly higher in Group B (Misoprostol) compared with Group A (Mifepristone followed by Misoprostol). The cost-effective analysis showed that the cost is higher among Misoprostol Group B compared with combination drugs of Group A (Mifepristone + Misoprostol), but this result is not significant. Conclusion: Mifepristone can be considered before Misoprostol in missed abortions. This regime might decrease the need for surgical evacuation.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T14:49:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8cc06d9e02bc484f8c7265ff3df6049c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2249-4863
2278-7135
language English
last_indexed 2025-02-18T06:23:58Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
spelling doaj.art-8cc06d9e02bc484f8c7265ff3df6049c2024-11-11T11:12:42ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Family Medicine and Primary Care2249-48632278-71352023-10-0112102423242710.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_503_23A prospective study on the effectiveness of a combination regime (Mifepristone and Misoprostol) in comparison with Misoprostol for missed abortionNidhi GuptaReva TripathiSumedha SharmaAruna NigamSanjeet PanesarIntroduction: Misoprostol is widely used in the medical management of missed abortions. However, pretreatment with Mifepristone has shown to be effective but still not recommended to be used in missed abortions. Aims and Objectives: To compare the outcome of medically managed missed abortion or blighted ovum using combination regime (Mifepristone and Misoprostol) vs Misoprostol alone. Materials and Methods: It was a prospective single-centre study performed in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, HIMSR and HAHC hospital, New Delhi, over, for one year. All the patients with diagnosed missed abortions were randomized into two groups (Group A and Group B). Group A was given Mifepristone 200 mg orally followed by Misoprostol 800 microgram per vaginal. Group B was given Misoprostol 800 microgram per vaginal. All the patients were observed for 24 hours for the expulsion of products of conception following the given regime. Ethical approval was taken from the Institutional Ethical Committee. Results: Both groups were comparable in demographic characteristics. On applying Fisher’s exact test, it has been observed that the odds of nonexpulsion of the product of conception, time taken in expulsion, and surgical evacuation because of excessive bleeding were significantly higher in Group B (Misoprostol) compared with Group A (Mifepristone followed by Misoprostol). The cost-effective analysis showed that the cost is higher among Misoprostol Group B compared with combination drugs of Group A (Mifepristone + Misoprostol), but this result is not significant. Conclusion: Mifepristone can be considered before Misoprostol in missed abortions. This regime might decrease the need for surgical evacuation.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_503_23expulsionmifepristonemisoprostolmissed abortionsurgical evacuation
spellingShingle Nidhi Gupta
Reva Tripathi
Sumedha Sharma
Aruna Nigam
Sanjeet Panesar
A prospective study on the effectiveness of a combination regime (Mifepristone and Misoprostol) in comparison with Misoprostol for missed abortion
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
expulsion
mifepristone
misoprostol
missed abortion
surgical evacuation
title A prospective study on the effectiveness of a combination regime (Mifepristone and Misoprostol) in comparison with Misoprostol for missed abortion
title_full A prospective study on the effectiveness of a combination regime (Mifepristone and Misoprostol) in comparison with Misoprostol for missed abortion
title_fullStr A prospective study on the effectiveness of a combination regime (Mifepristone and Misoprostol) in comparison with Misoprostol for missed abortion
title_full_unstemmed A prospective study on the effectiveness of a combination regime (Mifepristone and Misoprostol) in comparison with Misoprostol for missed abortion
title_short A prospective study on the effectiveness of a combination regime (Mifepristone and Misoprostol) in comparison with Misoprostol for missed abortion
title_sort prospective study on the effectiveness of a combination regime mifepristone and misoprostol in comparison with misoprostol for missed abortion
topic expulsion
mifepristone
misoprostol
missed abortion
surgical evacuation
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_503_23
work_keys_str_mv AT nidhigupta aprospectivestudyontheeffectivenessofacombinationregimemifepristoneandmisoprostolincomparisonwithmisoprostolformissedabortion
AT revatripathi aprospectivestudyontheeffectivenessofacombinationregimemifepristoneandmisoprostolincomparisonwithmisoprostolformissedabortion
AT sumedhasharma aprospectivestudyontheeffectivenessofacombinationregimemifepristoneandmisoprostolincomparisonwithmisoprostolformissedabortion
AT arunanigam aprospectivestudyontheeffectivenessofacombinationregimemifepristoneandmisoprostolincomparisonwithmisoprostolformissedabortion
AT sanjeetpanesar aprospectivestudyontheeffectivenessofacombinationregimemifepristoneandmisoprostolincomparisonwithmisoprostolformissedabortion
AT nidhigupta prospectivestudyontheeffectivenessofacombinationregimemifepristoneandmisoprostolincomparisonwithmisoprostolformissedabortion
AT revatripathi prospectivestudyontheeffectivenessofacombinationregimemifepristoneandmisoprostolincomparisonwithmisoprostolformissedabortion
AT sumedhasharma prospectivestudyontheeffectivenessofacombinationregimemifepristoneandmisoprostolincomparisonwithmisoprostolformissedabortion
AT arunanigam prospectivestudyontheeffectivenessofacombinationregimemifepristoneandmisoprostolincomparisonwithmisoprostolformissedabortion
AT sanjeetpanesar prospectivestudyontheeffectivenessofacombinationregimemifepristoneandmisoprostolincomparisonwithmisoprostolformissedabortion