Cost-effectiveness of immunotherapies for advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review

Abstract Background There are differences in the pharmacoeconomics of Immune checkpoint blocking (ICB) therapies for the treatment of lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). However, no corresponding review studies have fully discussed the cost-effectiveness of ICBs in treating LSCC. The aim of this pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Minyu Cheng, Yanfei Shao, Li Li, Menglao Jiang, Zhouye Song
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-03-01
Series:BMC Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-12043-w
_version_ 1797266779521679360
author Minyu Cheng
Yanfei Shao
Li Li
Menglao Jiang
Zhouye Song
author_facet Minyu Cheng
Yanfei Shao
Li Li
Menglao Jiang
Zhouye Song
author_sort Minyu Cheng
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background There are differences in the pharmacoeconomics of Immune checkpoint blocking (ICB) therapies for the treatment of lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). However, no corresponding review studies have fully discussed the cost-effectiveness of ICBs in treating LSCC. The aim of this paper is to systematically review and evaluate all available pharmacoeconomic studies of ICBs for LSCC. Method The inclusion criteria were based on the population, intervention, comparator, outcomes, and study designs. An electronic search was conducted by June 2023, and the following databases were used: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Search keywords included ‘Carcinoma’, Non-Small-Cell Lung’, ‘Immunotherapy’, and ‘Economics, Medical’. The primary outcome was the cost-effectiveness analysis of ICB therapy in LSCC patients. Drummond Checklist was used to assess quality problems and possible bias in the study design of included pharmacoeconomic studies. Results This review searched 15 articles on the economic evaluation of ICB treatment for LSCC. After a qualitative review of 15 studies, we concluded that nivolumab is more cost-effective as a monotherapy than chemotherapy alone. In the combination regimen, pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy appears to be the most cost-effective option at present, but for Chinese payers with LSCC, locally developed treatments such as sintilimab or toripalimab in combination with chemotherapy are more cost-effective. Discussion The inclusion of economic evaluation has heterogeneity in research design and outcomes, which can only support qualitative synthesis. Therefore, The results of this paper need to be treated with caution. For the Chinese market, instead of imported drugs, the possible cost-effectiveness of locally developed ICB therapies should be the focus of future research.
first_indexed 2024-04-25T01:06:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8cc41ecfc27f4cd68c7066f4168c18c0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2407
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-25T01:06:07Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Cancer
spelling doaj.art-8cc41ecfc27f4cd68c7066f4168c18c02024-03-10T12:14:53ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072024-03-0124111410.1186/s12885-024-12043-wCost-effectiveness of immunotherapies for advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic reviewMinyu Cheng0Yanfei Shao1Li Li2Menglao Jiang3Zhouye Song4Department of Pharmacy, Zhejiang HospitalDepartment of Pharmacy, Zhejiang Provincial Peopleʼs HospitalDepartment of Pharmacy, Zhejiang HospitalZhejiang Center of Drug and Cosmetics EvaluationDepartment of Pharmacy, Zhejiang HospitalAbstract Background There are differences in the pharmacoeconomics of Immune checkpoint blocking (ICB) therapies for the treatment of lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). However, no corresponding review studies have fully discussed the cost-effectiveness of ICBs in treating LSCC. The aim of this paper is to systematically review and evaluate all available pharmacoeconomic studies of ICBs for LSCC. Method The inclusion criteria were based on the population, intervention, comparator, outcomes, and study designs. An electronic search was conducted by June 2023, and the following databases were used: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Search keywords included ‘Carcinoma’, Non-Small-Cell Lung’, ‘Immunotherapy’, and ‘Economics, Medical’. The primary outcome was the cost-effectiveness analysis of ICB therapy in LSCC patients. Drummond Checklist was used to assess quality problems and possible bias in the study design of included pharmacoeconomic studies. Results This review searched 15 articles on the economic evaluation of ICB treatment for LSCC. After a qualitative review of 15 studies, we concluded that nivolumab is more cost-effective as a monotherapy than chemotherapy alone. In the combination regimen, pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy appears to be the most cost-effective option at present, but for Chinese payers with LSCC, locally developed treatments such as sintilimab or toripalimab in combination with chemotherapy are more cost-effective. Discussion The inclusion of economic evaluation has heterogeneity in research design and outcomes, which can only support qualitative synthesis. Therefore, The results of this paper need to be treated with caution. For the Chinese market, instead of imported drugs, the possible cost-effectiveness of locally developed ICB therapies should be the focus of future research.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-12043-wCost-effectivenessImmunotherapyNon-small cell lung cancerNivolumabPembrolizumabSintilimab
spellingShingle Minyu Cheng
Yanfei Shao
Li Li
Menglao Jiang
Zhouye Song
Cost-effectiveness of immunotherapies for advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review
BMC Cancer
Cost-effectiveness
Immunotherapy
Non-small cell lung cancer
Nivolumab
Pembrolizumab
Sintilimab
title Cost-effectiveness of immunotherapies for advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review
title_full Cost-effectiveness of immunotherapies for advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of immunotherapies for advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of immunotherapies for advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review
title_short Cost-effectiveness of immunotherapies for advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review
title_sort cost effectiveness of immunotherapies for advanced squamous non small cell lung cancer a systematic review
topic Cost-effectiveness
Immunotherapy
Non-small cell lung cancer
Nivolumab
Pembrolizumab
Sintilimab
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-12043-w
work_keys_str_mv AT minyucheng costeffectivenessofimmunotherapiesforadvancedsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreview
AT yanfeishao costeffectivenessofimmunotherapiesforadvancedsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreview
AT lili costeffectivenessofimmunotherapiesforadvancedsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreview
AT menglaojiang costeffectivenessofimmunotherapiesforadvancedsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreview
AT zhouyesong costeffectivenessofimmunotherapiesforadvancedsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreview