Identifying Policy Best-Practices to Support the Contribution of Aquatic Foods to Food and Nutrition Security

The relationship between aquatic foods and food nutrition and security is increasingly recognised in policy and practice, yet many governance instruments do not acknowledge or support this important connection. The most effective policy approaches to support the link between these sectors, or ‘best...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna K. Farmery, Amy White, Edward H. Allison
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-07-01
Series:Foods
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/10/7/1589
_version_ 1797527175769882624
author Anna K. Farmery
Amy White
Edward H. Allison
author_facet Anna K. Farmery
Amy White
Edward H. Allison
author_sort Anna K. Farmery
collection DOAJ
description The relationship between aquatic foods and food nutrition and security is increasingly recognised in policy and practice, yet many governance instruments do not acknowledge or support this important connection. The most effective policy approaches to support the link between these sectors, or ‘best practices’ are currently unknown. We reviewed relevant governance instruments from multiple countries to identify how these instruments linked fisheries, aquaculture and food security and nutrition, including the policy framing and evidence of political commitment. Of the documents connecting the sectors (65%), the majority did so in the context of developing the fisheries/aquaculture sector to increase aquatic food availability and/or access (51%), followed by developing the fisheries/aquaculture sector as a livelihoods approach to indirectly improve food security (33%), for example, through income generation. Sectoral links established in the context of nutrition-sensitive approaches to fisheries and aquaculture were less common (5%). Almost one third (29%) of instruments supported the connection between aquatic foods and food security and nutrition across three or more different contexts relevant to food security or food systems, while 12% indicated a very high level of commitment. We recommend some key attributes for future policy development to help build coherence between sectors and to help frame coherent food system-based policies.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T09:39:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8cf45b3197e94b7ea40f0792edebcf44
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2304-8158
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T09:39:22Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Foods
spelling doaj.art-8cf45b3197e94b7ea40f0792edebcf442023-11-22T03:47:37ZengMDPI AGFoods2304-81582021-07-01107158910.3390/foods10071589Identifying Policy Best-Practices to Support the Contribution of Aquatic Foods to Food and Nutrition SecurityAnna K. Farmery0Amy White1Edward H. Allison2Australian National Centre for Ocean Resources and Security, University of Wollongong, Wollongong 2522, AustraliaImpacto, Melbourne 3000, AustraliaWorldFish, Penang 11960, MalaysiaThe relationship between aquatic foods and food nutrition and security is increasingly recognised in policy and practice, yet many governance instruments do not acknowledge or support this important connection. The most effective policy approaches to support the link between these sectors, or ‘best practices’ are currently unknown. We reviewed relevant governance instruments from multiple countries to identify how these instruments linked fisheries, aquaculture and food security and nutrition, including the policy framing and evidence of political commitment. Of the documents connecting the sectors (65%), the majority did so in the context of developing the fisheries/aquaculture sector to increase aquatic food availability and/or access (51%), followed by developing the fisheries/aquaculture sector as a livelihoods approach to indirectly improve food security (33%), for example, through income generation. Sectoral links established in the context of nutrition-sensitive approaches to fisheries and aquaculture were less common (5%). Almost one third (29%) of instruments supported the connection between aquatic foods and food security and nutrition across three or more different contexts relevant to food security or food systems, while 12% indicated a very high level of commitment. We recommend some key attributes for future policy development to help build coherence between sectors and to help frame coherent food system-based policies.https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/10/7/1589aquatic foodsfisheriesaquaculturehealthgovernancefood systems
spellingShingle Anna K. Farmery
Amy White
Edward H. Allison
Identifying Policy Best-Practices to Support the Contribution of Aquatic Foods to Food and Nutrition Security
Foods
aquatic foods
fisheries
aquaculture
health
governance
food systems
title Identifying Policy Best-Practices to Support the Contribution of Aquatic Foods to Food and Nutrition Security
title_full Identifying Policy Best-Practices to Support the Contribution of Aquatic Foods to Food and Nutrition Security
title_fullStr Identifying Policy Best-Practices to Support the Contribution of Aquatic Foods to Food and Nutrition Security
title_full_unstemmed Identifying Policy Best-Practices to Support the Contribution of Aquatic Foods to Food and Nutrition Security
title_short Identifying Policy Best-Practices to Support the Contribution of Aquatic Foods to Food and Nutrition Security
title_sort identifying policy best practices to support the contribution of aquatic foods to food and nutrition security
topic aquatic foods
fisheries
aquaculture
health
governance
food systems
url https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/10/7/1589
work_keys_str_mv AT annakfarmery identifyingpolicybestpracticestosupportthecontributionofaquaticfoodstofoodandnutritionsecurity
AT amywhite identifyingpolicybestpracticestosupportthecontributionofaquaticfoodstofoodandnutritionsecurity
AT edwardhallison identifyingpolicybestpracticestosupportthecontributionofaquaticfoodstofoodandnutritionsecurity