Ultrasonography and clinical outcomes following anti-incontinence procedures (Monarc vs MiniArc): A 3-year post-operative review.

<h4>Objective</h4>To compare the ultrasonographic positional changes of mid-urethral sling(MUS) tape in relation to symphysis pubis, and the different clinical outcomes among women who underwent MUS insertion with MiniArcTM or MonarcTM for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence 3 y...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tsia-Shu Lo, Sandy Chua, Yiap Loong Tan, Ma Clarissa Patrimonio, Leng Boi Pue
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207375
_version_ 1819144147586514944
author Tsia-Shu Lo
Sandy Chua
Yiap Loong Tan
Ma Clarissa Patrimonio
Leng Boi Pue
author_facet Tsia-Shu Lo
Sandy Chua
Yiap Loong Tan
Ma Clarissa Patrimonio
Leng Boi Pue
author_sort Tsia-Shu Lo
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Objective</h4>To compare the ultrasonographic positional changes of mid-urethral sling(MUS) tape in relation to symphysis pubis, and the different clinical outcomes among women who underwent MUS insertion with MiniArcTM or MonarcTM for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence 3 years after.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>A retrospective follow-up study on patients with clinically confirmed stress urodynamic incontinence and urodynamic stress incontinence who had undergone MiniArc or Monarc surgery. Data regarding preoperative evaluation, intraoperative complications and post-operative follow-ups were collated. Main outcome is to determine the change in position of the sling through measurement of the x- and y-axis at rest and during Valsalva maneuver using the 3D introital ultrasound.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 138 patients were evaluated, 82 belonged to Monarc and 56 to MiniArc. At 3years, objective and subjective cure rates for MiniArc and Monarc were comparable (88%, 91%; p>0.05; 83%, 89%, p>0.05 respectively). Ultrasonographic changes between MiniArc and Monarc from 6 months to 3 years, showed MiniArc to exhibit significant movement in both x- [3.0 ±0.4 mm vs. 2.2 ±0.3 mm (p = 0.02) at rest; 2.6 ±0.3 mm vs. 1.6 ±0.3 mm (p<0.001) during valsalva] and y-axis [3.5 ±0.5 mm vs. 2.0 ±0.3 mm (p<0.001) at rest; 3.3 ±0.5 mm vs. 2.9 ±0.3 mm (p = 0.037) during Valsalva]. The mobility of MiniArc was significantly more than Monarc from rest to Valsalva (1.1 ±0.4 mm vs. 0.3 ±0.3 mm, p = 0.001). Tightness of the sling assessed from the major and minor axis of the urethral core had no significant difference in both groups at rest and during Valsalva. Urethral kinking percentage and the location of the sling did not yield statistical difference.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Maintenance of continence rates of mid-urethral slings depends on the compressive effect of the sling on the urethra, urethral kinking, and sling fixation. From 6months to 3 years, MiniArc changed its position in both x- and y-axis over time, which the authors attribute to loosening of the anchoring mechanism since no clinical relevance could be sought.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T12:37:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8cff28c7cf1c4c5595cb2058100d7db9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T12:37:31Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-8cff28c7cf1c4c5595cb2058100d7db92022-12-21T18:25:32ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-011312e020737510.1371/journal.pone.0207375Ultrasonography and clinical outcomes following anti-incontinence procedures (Monarc vs MiniArc): A 3-year post-operative review.Tsia-Shu LoSandy ChuaYiap Loong TanMa Clarissa PatrimonioLeng Boi Pue<h4>Objective</h4>To compare the ultrasonographic positional changes of mid-urethral sling(MUS) tape in relation to symphysis pubis, and the different clinical outcomes among women who underwent MUS insertion with MiniArcTM or MonarcTM for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence 3 years after.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>A retrospective follow-up study on patients with clinically confirmed stress urodynamic incontinence and urodynamic stress incontinence who had undergone MiniArc or Monarc surgery. Data regarding preoperative evaluation, intraoperative complications and post-operative follow-ups were collated. Main outcome is to determine the change in position of the sling through measurement of the x- and y-axis at rest and during Valsalva maneuver using the 3D introital ultrasound.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 138 patients were evaluated, 82 belonged to Monarc and 56 to MiniArc. At 3years, objective and subjective cure rates for MiniArc and Monarc were comparable (88%, 91%; p>0.05; 83%, 89%, p>0.05 respectively). Ultrasonographic changes between MiniArc and Monarc from 6 months to 3 years, showed MiniArc to exhibit significant movement in both x- [3.0 ±0.4 mm vs. 2.2 ±0.3 mm (p = 0.02) at rest; 2.6 ±0.3 mm vs. 1.6 ±0.3 mm (p<0.001) during valsalva] and y-axis [3.5 ±0.5 mm vs. 2.0 ±0.3 mm (p<0.001) at rest; 3.3 ±0.5 mm vs. 2.9 ±0.3 mm (p = 0.037) during Valsalva]. The mobility of MiniArc was significantly more than Monarc from rest to Valsalva (1.1 ±0.4 mm vs. 0.3 ±0.3 mm, p = 0.001). Tightness of the sling assessed from the major and minor axis of the urethral core had no significant difference in both groups at rest and during Valsalva. Urethral kinking percentage and the location of the sling did not yield statistical difference.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Maintenance of continence rates of mid-urethral slings depends on the compressive effect of the sling on the urethra, urethral kinking, and sling fixation. From 6months to 3 years, MiniArc changed its position in both x- and y-axis over time, which the authors attribute to loosening of the anchoring mechanism since no clinical relevance could be sought.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207375
spellingShingle Tsia-Shu Lo
Sandy Chua
Yiap Loong Tan
Ma Clarissa Patrimonio
Leng Boi Pue
Ultrasonography and clinical outcomes following anti-incontinence procedures (Monarc vs MiniArc): A 3-year post-operative review.
PLoS ONE
title Ultrasonography and clinical outcomes following anti-incontinence procedures (Monarc vs MiniArc): A 3-year post-operative review.
title_full Ultrasonography and clinical outcomes following anti-incontinence procedures (Monarc vs MiniArc): A 3-year post-operative review.
title_fullStr Ultrasonography and clinical outcomes following anti-incontinence procedures (Monarc vs MiniArc): A 3-year post-operative review.
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasonography and clinical outcomes following anti-incontinence procedures (Monarc vs MiniArc): A 3-year post-operative review.
title_short Ultrasonography and clinical outcomes following anti-incontinence procedures (Monarc vs MiniArc): A 3-year post-operative review.
title_sort ultrasonography and clinical outcomes following anti incontinence procedures monarc vs miniarc a 3 year post operative review
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207375
work_keys_str_mv AT tsiashulo ultrasonographyandclinicaloutcomesfollowingantiincontinenceproceduresmonarcvsminiarca3yearpostoperativereview
AT sandychua ultrasonographyandclinicaloutcomesfollowingantiincontinenceproceduresmonarcvsminiarca3yearpostoperativereview
AT yiaploongtan ultrasonographyandclinicaloutcomesfollowingantiincontinenceproceduresmonarcvsminiarca3yearpostoperativereview
AT maclarissapatrimonio ultrasonographyandclinicaloutcomesfollowingantiincontinenceproceduresmonarcvsminiarca3yearpostoperativereview
AT lengboipue ultrasonographyandclinicaloutcomesfollowingantiincontinenceproceduresmonarcvsminiarca3yearpostoperativereview