Evaluation of non-response to the In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (ICH CAHPS) survey

Abstract Background The In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (ICH CAHPS) Survey is the first patient reported outcome measure included in the U.S. Medicare End Stage Renal Disease Quality Incentive Program. Administered twice yearly, it assesses in-center di...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Taimur Dad, Hocine Tighiouart, Joshua J. Fenton, Eduardo Lacson, Klemens B. Meyer, Dana C. Miskulin, Daniel E. Weiner, Michelle M. Richardson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-10-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-018-3618-4
_version_ 1811204202861428736
author Taimur Dad
Hocine Tighiouart
Joshua J. Fenton
Eduardo Lacson
Klemens B. Meyer
Dana C. Miskulin
Daniel E. Weiner
Michelle M. Richardson
author_facet Taimur Dad
Hocine Tighiouart
Joshua J. Fenton
Eduardo Lacson
Klemens B. Meyer
Dana C. Miskulin
Daniel E. Weiner
Michelle M. Richardson
author_sort Taimur Dad
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (ICH CAHPS) Survey is the first patient reported outcome measure included in the U.S. Medicare End Stage Renal Disease Quality Incentive Program. Administered twice yearly, it assesses in-center dialysis experience and survey responses are tied to dialysis facility payments. Low response rates, currently approximately 35%, raise concern for possible underrepresentation of patient groups. Methods Cross-sectional analysis of survey administration in 2012 to all in-center hemodialysis patients in Dialysis Clinic, Inc. (DCI) facilities nationally over 18 years old who received hemodialysis at their facility for at least 3 months. Patient-level covariates included demographic, clinical, laboratory, and functional characteristics. Random effects multivariable logistic regression was used to assess survey non-response. Results Among 11,055 eligible patients 6541 (59%) were non-responders. Of the remaining 4514 responders, 549 (14%) surveys were not usable due to presence of proxy help or incomplete responses. Non-responders were more likely to be men, non-white, younger, single, dual Medicare/Medicaid eligible, less educated, non-English speaking, and not active on the transplant list; non-responders had longer ESRD vintage, lower body mass index, lower serum albumin, worse functional status, and more hospitalizations, missed treatments, and shortened treatments. Similar associations were found using more parsimonious multivariable analyses and after imputing missing data. Conclusions Non-responders to the ICH CAHPS significantly differed from responders, broadly spanning individuals with fewer socioeconomic advantages and greater illness burden, raising limitations in interpreting facility survey results. Future research should assess reasons for non-response to improve ICH CAHPS generalizability and utility.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T03:07:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8d00ab7ec4ee4c428ab2372b879123f7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6963
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T03:07:17Z
publishDate 2018-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj.art-8d00ab7ec4ee4c428ab2372b879123f72022-12-22T03:50:27ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632018-10-0118111010.1186/s12913-018-3618-4Evaluation of non-response to the In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (ICH CAHPS) surveyTaimur Dad0Hocine Tighiouart1Joshua J. Fenton2Eduardo Lacson3Klemens B. Meyer4Dana C. Miskulin5Daniel E. Weiner6Michelle M. Richardson7Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of MedicineTufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of MedicineDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of CaliforniaTufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of MedicineTufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of MedicineTufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of MedicineTufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of MedicineTufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of MedicineAbstract Background The In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (ICH CAHPS) Survey is the first patient reported outcome measure included in the U.S. Medicare End Stage Renal Disease Quality Incentive Program. Administered twice yearly, it assesses in-center dialysis experience and survey responses are tied to dialysis facility payments. Low response rates, currently approximately 35%, raise concern for possible underrepresentation of patient groups. Methods Cross-sectional analysis of survey administration in 2012 to all in-center hemodialysis patients in Dialysis Clinic, Inc. (DCI) facilities nationally over 18 years old who received hemodialysis at their facility for at least 3 months. Patient-level covariates included demographic, clinical, laboratory, and functional characteristics. Random effects multivariable logistic regression was used to assess survey non-response. Results Among 11,055 eligible patients 6541 (59%) were non-responders. Of the remaining 4514 responders, 549 (14%) surveys were not usable due to presence of proxy help or incomplete responses. Non-responders were more likely to be men, non-white, younger, single, dual Medicare/Medicaid eligible, less educated, non-English speaking, and not active on the transplant list; non-responders had longer ESRD vintage, lower body mass index, lower serum albumin, worse functional status, and more hospitalizations, missed treatments, and shortened treatments. Similar associations were found using more parsimonious multivariable analyses and after imputing missing data. Conclusions Non-responders to the ICH CAHPS significantly differed from responders, broadly spanning individuals with fewer socioeconomic advantages and greater illness burden, raising limitations in interpreting facility survey results. Future research should assess reasons for non-response to improve ICH CAHPS generalizability and utility.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-018-3618-4HemodialysisCAHPSICH CAHPSPatient reported outcomePatient satisfactionPatient experience
spellingShingle Taimur Dad
Hocine Tighiouart
Joshua J. Fenton
Eduardo Lacson
Klemens B. Meyer
Dana C. Miskulin
Daniel E. Weiner
Michelle M. Richardson
Evaluation of non-response to the In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (ICH CAHPS) survey
BMC Health Services Research
Hemodialysis
CAHPS
ICH CAHPS
Patient reported outcome
Patient satisfaction
Patient experience
title Evaluation of non-response to the In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (ICH CAHPS) survey
title_full Evaluation of non-response to the In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (ICH CAHPS) survey
title_fullStr Evaluation of non-response to the In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (ICH CAHPS) survey
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of non-response to the In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (ICH CAHPS) survey
title_short Evaluation of non-response to the In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (ICH CAHPS) survey
title_sort evaluation of non response to the in center hemodialysis consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems ich cahps survey
topic Hemodialysis
CAHPS
ICH CAHPS
Patient reported outcome
Patient satisfaction
Patient experience
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-018-3618-4
work_keys_str_mv AT taimurdad evaluationofnonresponsetotheincenterhemodialysisconsumerassessmentofhealthcareprovidersandsystemsichcahpssurvey
AT hocinetighiouart evaluationofnonresponsetotheincenterhemodialysisconsumerassessmentofhealthcareprovidersandsystemsichcahpssurvey
AT joshuajfenton evaluationofnonresponsetotheincenterhemodialysisconsumerassessmentofhealthcareprovidersandsystemsichcahpssurvey
AT eduardolacson evaluationofnonresponsetotheincenterhemodialysisconsumerassessmentofhealthcareprovidersandsystemsichcahpssurvey
AT klemensbmeyer evaluationofnonresponsetotheincenterhemodialysisconsumerassessmentofhealthcareprovidersandsystemsichcahpssurvey
AT danacmiskulin evaluationofnonresponsetotheincenterhemodialysisconsumerassessmentofhealthcareprovidersandsystemsichcahpssurvey
AT danieleweiner evaluationofnonresponsetotheincenterhemodialysisconsumerassessmentofhealthcareprovidersandsystemsichcahpssurvey
AT michellemrichardson evaluationofnonresponsetotheincenterhemodialysisconsumerassessmentofhealthcareprovidersandsystemsichcahpssurvey