Evaluation of methodological quality of studies

Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) is a systematic approach to medical question, integrating individual clinical expertise with the best available clinical evidence from systematic research. Systematic reviews are key in practice of EBM and are to the peak of the evidence pyramid. In performing a system...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vanessa Palmeri, Vittoria Colamesta, Giuseppe La Torre
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Eleven Senses 2016-09-01
Series:Senses and Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sensesandsciences.com/palmeriv3i3
_version_ 1818526793506750464
author Vanessa Palmeri
Vittoria Colamesta
Giuseppe La Torre
author_facet Vanessa Palmeri
Vittoria Colamesta
Giuseppe La Torre
author_sort Vanessa Palmeri
collection DOAJ
description Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) is a systematic approach to medical question, integrating individual clinical expertise with the best available clinical evidence from systematic research. Systematic reviews are key in practice of EBM and are to the peak of the evidence pyramid. In performing a systematic review/meta-analysis and overview of systematic reviews, the evaluation of methodological quality of the included studies represents an important step to identify poor quality studies that can give a falsification of effect's esteems. The aim of the present article is to analyze the rating scales about methodological quality of observational studies, experimental studies, economic analysis, studies about diagnostic tests and systematic review.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T06:27:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8d01404bdf644f72bd1fe2eb53bc9b31
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2284-2489
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T06:27:49Z
publishDate 2016-09-01
publisher Eleven Senses
record_format Article
series Senses and Sciences
spelling doaj.art-8d01404bdf644f72bd1fe2eb53bc9b312022-12-22T01:17:37ZengEleven SensesSenses and Sciences2284-24892016-09-013323524110.14616/sands-2016-3-235241Evaluation of methodological quality of studiesVanessa Palmeri0Vittoria Colamesta1Giuseppe La Torre 2Department of Public Health and Infection Diseases, “Sapienza” - University of RomeDepartment of Public Health and Infection Diseases, “Sapienza” - University of RomeDepartment of Public Health and Infection Diseases, “Sapienza” - University of RomeEvidence-Based Medicine (EBM) is a systematic approach to medical question, integrating individual clinical expertise with the best available clinical evidence from systematic research. Systematic reviews are key in practice of EBM and are to the peak of the evidence pyramid. In performing a systematic review/meta-analysis and overview of systematic reviews, the evaluation of methodological quality of the included studies represents an important step to identify poor quality studies that can give a falsification of effect's esteems. The aim of the present article is to analyze the rating scales about methodological quality of observational studies, experimental studies, economic analysis, studies about diagnostic tests and systematic review.http://www.sensesandsciences.com/palmeriv3i3Evidence-Based Medicinemethodological qualitysystematic reviewobservational studiesclinical trial
spellingShingle Vanessa Palmeri
Vittoria Colamesta
Giuseppe La Torre
Evaluation of methodological quality of studies
Senses and Sciences
Evidence-Based Medicine
methodological quality
systematic review
observational studies
clinical trial
title Evaluation of methodological quality of studies
title_full Evaluation of methodological quality of studies
title_fullStr Evaluation of methodological quality of studies
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of methodological quality of studies
title_short Evaluation of methodological quality of studies
title_sort evaluation of methodological quality of studies
topic Evidence-Based Medicine
methodological quality
systematic review
observational studies
clinical trial
url http://www.sensesandsciences.com/palmeriv3i3
work_keys_str_mv AT vanessapalmeri evaluationofmethodologicalqualityofstudies
AT vittoriacolamesta evaluationofmethodologicalqualityofstudies
AT giuseppelatorre evaluationofmethodologicalqualityofstudies