Forensic age estimation in living children: how accurate is the Greulich-Pyle method in Sabah, East Malaysia?

BackgroundThe Greulich and Pyle's Radiographic Atlas of Skeletal Development of the Hand and Wrist (GP Atlas) is the most widely used method of determining the bone age (BA) of a child. It is also a widely accepted method for forensic age determination. As there is limited local bone age data f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Khin Mya Nang, Abdul Jabbar Ismail, Anithaa Tangaperumal, Aye Aye Wynn, Tin Tin Thein, Firdaus Hayati, Yong Guang Teh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2023.1137960/full
_version_ 1797803805071376384
author Khin Mya Nang
Abdul Jabbar Ismail
Anithaa Tangaperumal
Aye Aye Wynn
Tin Tin Thein
Firdaus Hayati
Yong Guang Teh
author_facet Khin Mya Nang
Abdul Jabbar Ismail
Anithaa Tangaperumal
Aye Aye Wynn
Tin Tin Thein
Firdaus Hayati
Yong Guang Teh
author_sort Khin Mya Nang
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundThe Greulich and Pyle's Radiographic Atlas of Skeletal Development of the Hand and Wrist (GP Atlas) is the most widely used method of determining the bone age (BA) of a child. It is also a widely accepted method for forensic age determination. As there is limited local bone age data for forensic age estimation, the purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of the GP Atlas for forensic age determination in living Sabahan children.MethodThis study recruited 182 children between the ages of 9 years to 18 years. BA estimation of the left-hand anteroposterior radiographs were performed by two experienced radiologists using the Greulich-Pyle method.ResultsThe BA estimates from two radiologists had very high interobserver reliability (ICC 0.937) and a strong positive interobserver correlation (r > 0.90). The GP method, significantly and consistently underestimated chronological age (CA) by 0.7, 0.6 and 0.7 years in overall children, boys and girls respectively with minimal errors. Mean absolute error and root of mean squared error for overall children was 1.5 and 2.2 years respectively, while mean absolute percentage error was 11.6%. This underestimation was consistent across all age groups but was statistically significant only at 13–13.9 and 17–18.9 years old age groups.ConclusionDespite high interobserver reliability of BA estimation using the GP Atlas, this method consistently underestimates the age of the child in all children to a significant degree, for both boys and girls across all age groups, with an acceptably low level of error metrics. Our findings suggest that locally validated GP Atlas or other type of assessments (artificial intelligence or machine learning) are needed for assessment of BA to accurately predict CA, since current GP Atlas standards significantly underestimated chronological age with minimal error for children in Sabah. A larger population-based study would be necessary for establishing a validated atlas of a bone age in Malaysia.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T05:27:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8d170f670d804ce7bfcdff56f4dbef07
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-2360
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T05:27:32Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pediatrics
spelling doaj.art-8d170f670d804ce7bfcdff56f4dbef072023-06-15T05:14:37ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pediatrics2296-23602023-06-011110.3389/fped.2023.11379601137960Forensic age estimation in living children: how accurate is the Greulich-Pyle method in Sabah, East Malaysia?Khin Mya Nang0Abdul Jabbar Ismail1Anithaa Tangaperumal2Aye Aye Wynn3Tin Tin Thein4Firdaus Hayati5Yong Guang Teh6Department of Pathology & Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, MalaysiaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, MalaysiaDepartment of Radiology, Serdang Hospital, Kajang, MalaysiaDepartment of Pathology & Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, MalaysiaDepartment of Pathology & Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, MalaysiaDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, MalaysiaDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, MalaysiaBackgroundThe Greulich and Pyle's Radiographic Atlas of Skeletal Development of the Hand and Wrist (GP Atlas) is the most widely used method of determining the bone age (BA) of a child. It is also a widely accepted method for forensic age determination. As there is limited local bone age data for forensic age estimation, the purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of the GP Atlas for forensic age determination in living Sabahan children.MethodThis study recruited 182 children between the ages of 9 years to 18 years. BA estimation of the left-hand anteroposterior radiographs were performed by two experienced radiologists using the Greulich-Pyle method.ResultsThe BA estimates from two radiologists had very high interobserver reliability (ICC 0.937) and a strong positive interobserver correlation (r > 0.90). The GP method, significantly and consistently underestimated chronological age (CA) by 0.7, 0.6 and 0.7 years in overall children, boys and girls respectively with minimal errors. Mean absolute error and root of mean squared error for overall children was 1.5 and 2.2 years respectively, while mean absolute percentage error was 11.6%. This underestimation was consistent across all age groups but was statistically significant only at 13–13.9 and 17–18.9 years old age groups.ConclusionDespite high interobserver reliability of BA estimation using the GP Atlas, this method consistently underestimates the age of the child in all children to a significant degree, for both boys and girls across all age groups, with an acceptably low level of error metrics. Our findings suggest that locally validated GP Atlas or other type of assessments (artificial intelligence or machine learning) are needed for assessment of BA to accurately predict CA, since current GP Atlas standards significantly underestimated chronological age with minimal error for children in Sabah. A larger population-based study would be necessary for establishing a validated atlas of a bone age in Malaysia.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2023.1137960/fullbone ageforensic ageGreulich-Pyle atlasSabahradiograph
spellingShingle Khin Mya Nang
Abdul Jabbar Ismail
Anithaa Tangaperumal
Aye Aye Wynn
Tin Tin Thein
Firdaus Hayati
Yong Guang Teh
Forensic age estimation in living children: how accurate is the Greulich-Pyle method in Sabah, East Malaysia?
Frontiers in Pediatrics
bone age
forensic age
Greulich-Pyle atlas
Sabah
radiograph
title Forensic age estimation in living children: how accurate is the Greulich-Pyle method in Sabah, East Malaysia?
title_full Forensic age estimation in living children: how accurate is the Greulich-Pyle method in Sabah, East Malaysia?
title_fullStr Forensic age estimation in living children: how accurate is the Greulich-Pyle method in Sabah, East Malaysia?
title_full_unstemmed Forensic age estimation in living children: how accurate is the Greulich-Pyle method in Sabah, East Malaysia?
title_short Forensic age estimation in living children: how accurate is the Greulich-Pyle method in Sabah, East Malaysia?
title_sort forensic age estimation in living children how accurate is the greulich pyle method in sabah east malaysia
topic bone age
forensic age
Greulich-Pyle atlas
Sabah
radiograph
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2023.1137960/full
work_keys_str_mv AT khinmyanang forensicageestimationinlivingchildrenhowaccurateisthegreulichpylemethodinsabaheastmalaysia
AT abduljabbarismail forensicageestimationinlivingchildrenhowaccurateisthegreulichpylemethodinsabaheastmalaysia
AT anithaatangaperumal forensicageestimationinlivingchildrenhowaccurateisthegreulichpylemethodinsabaheastmalaysia
AT ayeayewynn forensicageestimationinlivingchildrenhowaccurateisthegreulichpylemethodinsabaheastmalaysia
AT tintinthein forensicageestimationinlivingchildrenhowaccurateisthegreulichpylemethodinsabaheastmalaysia
AT firdaushayati forensicageestimationinlivingchildrenhowaccurateisthegreulichpylemethodinsabaheastmalaysia
AT yongguangteh forensicageestimationinlivingchildrenhowaccurateisthegreulichpylemethodinsabaheastmalaysia