Postoperative short‐term outcomes of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis
Background We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to synthesize the available evidence regarding short‐term outcomes between minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and open esophagectomy (OE). Methods Studies were identified by searching databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2020-06-01
|
| Series: | Thoracic Cancer |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13413 |
| _version_ | 1818259480324866048 |
|---|---|
| author | Naeem M. Akhtar Donglai Chen Yuhuan Zhao David Dane Yuhang Xue Wenjia Wang Jiaheng Zhang Yonghua Sang Chang Chen Yongbing Chen |
| author_facet | Naeem M. Akhtar Donglai Chen Yuhuan Zhao David Dane Yuhang Xue Wenjia Wang Jiaheng Zhang Yonghua Sang Chang Chen Yongbing Chen |
| author_sort | Naeem M. Akhtar |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to synthesize the available evidence regarding short‐term outcomes between minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and open esophagectomy (OE). Methods Studies were identified by searching databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library up to March 2019 without language restrictions. Results of these searches were filtered according to a set of eligibility criteria and analyzed in line with PRISMA guidelines. Results There were 33 studies included with a total of 13 269 patients in our review, out of which 4948 cases were of MIE and 8321 cases were of OE. The pooled results suggested that MIE had a better outcome regarding all‐cause respiratory complications (RCs) (OR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.41–0.78, P = <0.001), in‐hospital duration (SMD = −0.51; 95% CI = −0.78−0.24; P = <0.001), and blood loss (SMD = −1.44; 95% CI = −1.95−0.93; P = <0.001). OE was associated with shorter duration of operation time, while no statistically significant differences were observed regarding other outcomes. Additionally, subgroup analyses were performed for a number of different postoperative events. Conclusions Our study indicated that MIE had more favorable outcomes than OE from the perspective of short‐term outcomes. Further large‐scale, multicenter randomized control trials are needed to explore the long‐term survival outcomes after MIE versus OE. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-12T18:16:06Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-8d1e77de4b804e078ca194c84bfbcc40 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1759-7706 1759-7714 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-12T18:16:06Z |
| publishDate | 2020-06-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Thoracic Cancer |
| spelling | doaj.art-8d1e77de4b804e078ca194c84bfbcc402022-12-22T00:16:15ZengWileyThoracic Cancer1759-77061759-77142020-06-011161465147510.1111/1759-7714.13413Postoperative short‐term outcomes of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysisNaeem M. Akhtar0Donglai Chen1Yuhuan Zhao2David Dane3Yuhang Xue4Wenjia Wang5Jiaheng Zhang6Yonghua Sang7Chang Chen8Yongbing Chen9Department of Thoracic Surgery, School of Medicine The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University Suzhou ChinaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine Tongji University Shanghai ChinaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, School of Medicine The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University Suzhou ChinaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, School of Medicine The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University Suzhou ChinaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, School of Medicine The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University Suzhou ChinaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, School of Medicine The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University Suzhou ChinaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, School of Medicine The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University Suzhou ChinaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, School of Medicine The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University Suzhou ChinaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine Tongji University Shanghai ChinaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, School of Medicine The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University Suzhou ChinaBackground We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to synthesize the available evidence regarding short‐term outcomes between minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and open esophagectomy (OE). Methods Studies were identified by searching databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library up to March 2019 without language restrictions. Results of these searches were filtered according to a set of eligibility criteria and analyzed in line with PRISMA guidelines. Results There were 33 studies included with a total of 13 269 patients in our review, out of which 4948 cases were of MIE and 8321 cases were of OE. The pooled results suggested that MIE had a better outcome regarding all‐cause respiratory complications (RCs) (OR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.41–0.78, P = <0.001), in‐hospital duration (SMD = −0.51; 95% CI = −0.78−0.24; P = <0.001), and blood loss (SMD = −1.44; 95% CI = −1.95−0.93; P = <0.001). OE was associated with shorter duration of operation time, while no statistically significant differences were observed regarding other outcomes. Additionally, subgroup analyses were performed for a number of different postoperative events. Conclusions Our study indicated that MIE had more favorable outcomes than OE from the perspective of short‐term outcomes. Further large‐scale, multicenter randomized control trials are needed to explore the long‐term survival outcomes after MIE versus OE.https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13413Esophageal canceresophagectomyminimally‐invasive surgery |
| spellingShingle | Naeem M. Akhtar Donglai Chen Yuhuan Zhao David Dane Yuhang Xue Wenjia Wang Jiaheng Zhang Yonghua Sang Chang Chen Yongbing Chen Postoperative short‐term outcomes of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis Thoracic Cancer Esophageal cancer esophagectomy minimally‐invasive surgery |
| title | Postoperative short‐term outcomes of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis |
| title_full | Postoperative short‐term outcomes of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis |
| title_fullStr | Postoperative short‐term outcomes of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Postoperative short‐term outcomes of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis |
| title_short | Postoperative short‐term outcomes of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis |
| title_sort | postoperative short term outcomes of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer an updated systematic review and meta analysis |
| topic | Esophageal cancer esophagectomy minimally‐invasive surgery |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13413 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT naeemmakhtar postoperativeshorttermoutcomesofminimallyinvasiveversusopenesophagectomyforpatientswithesophagealcanceranupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT donglaichen postoperativeshorttermoutcomesofminimallyinvasiveversusopenesophagectomyforpatientswithesophagealcanceranupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yuhuanzhao postoperativeshorttermoutcomesofminimallyinvasiveversusopenesophagectomyforpatientswithesophagealcanceranupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT daviddane postoperativeshorttermoutcomesofminimallyinvasiveversusopenesophagectomyforpatientswithesophagealcanceranupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yuhangxue postoperativeshorttermoutcomesofminimallyinvasiveversusopenesophagectomyforpatientswithesophagealcanceranupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wenjiawang postoperativeshorttermoutcomesofminimallyinvasiveversusopenesophagectomyforpatientswithesophagealcanceranupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jiahengzhang postoperativeshorttermoutcomesofminimallyinvasiveversusopenesophagectomyforpatientswithesophagealcanceranupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yonghuasang postoperativeshorttermoutcomesofminimallyinvasiveversusopenesophagectomyforpatientswithesophagealcanceranupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT changchen postoperativeshorttermoutcomesofminimallyinvasiveversusopenesophagectomyforpatientswithesophagealcanceranupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yongbingchen postoperativeshorttermoutcomesofminimallyinvasiveversusopenesophagectomyforpatientswithesophagealcanceranupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |