State responsibility and counterterrorism

It is widely thought that the international community, taken as a whole, is required to take action to prevent terrorism. Yet, what each state is required to do in this project is unclear and contested. This article examines a number of bases on which we might assign responsibilities to conduct coun...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Isaac Taylor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2016-12-01
Series:Ethics & Global Politics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ethicsandglobalpolitics.net/index.php/egp/article/view/32542/50463
_version_ 1818945402089504768
author Isaac Taylor
author_facet Isaac Taylor
author_sort Isaac Taylor
collection DOAJ
description It is widely thought that the international community, taken as a whole, is required to take action to prevent terrorism. Yet, what each state is required to do in this project is unclear and contested. This article examines a number of bases on which we might assign responsibilities to conduct counterterrorist operations to states. I argue that the ways in which other sorts of responsibilities have been assigned to states by political philosophers will face significant limitations when used to assign the necessary costs of preventing terrorism. I go on to suggest that appealing to the principle of fairness—which assigns obligations on the basis of benefits received from cooperative endeavours—may be used to make up the shortfall, despite this principle having received relatively little attention in existing normative accounts of states’ responsibilities.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T07:58:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8d1f9fc267d545b7aee24c3f8e3cafc9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1654-6369
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T07:58:32Z
publishDate 2016-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Ethics & Global Politics
spelling doaj.art-8d1f9fc267d545b7aee24c3f8e3cafc92022-12-21T19:47:35ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEthics & Global Politics1654-63692016-12-019011910.3402/egp.v9.3254232542State responsibility and counterterrorismIsaac Taylor0Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, GermanyIt is widely thought that the international community, taken as a whole, is required to take action to prevent terrorism. Yet, what each state is required to do in this project is unclear and contested. This article examines a number of bases on which we might assign responsibilities to conduct counterterrorist operations to states. I argue that the ways in which other sorts of responsibilities have been assigned to states by political philosophers will face significant limitations when used to assign the necessary costs of preventing terrorism. I go on to suggest that appealing to the principle of fairness—which assigns obligations on the basis of benefits received from cooperative endeavours—may be used to make up the shortfall, despite this principle having received relatively little attention in existing normative accounts of states’ responsibilities.http://www.ethicsandglobalpolitics.net/index.php/egp/article/view/32542/50463terrorismremedial responsibilitycapacityeffectivenessliabilityprinciple of fairness
spellingShingle Isaac Taylor
State responsibility and counterterrorism
Ethics & Global Politics
terrorism
remedial responsibility
capacity
effectiveness
liability
principle of fairness
title State responsibility and counterterrorism
title_full State responsibility and counterterrorism
title_fullStr State responsibility and counterterrorism
title_full_unstemmed State responsibility and counterterrorism
title_short State responsibility and counterterrorism
title_sort state responsibility and counterterrorism
topic terrorism
remedial responsibility
capacity
effectiveness
liability
principle of fairness
url http://www.ethicsandglobalpolitics.net/index.php/egp/article/view/32542/50463
work_keys_str_mv AT isaactaylor stateresponsibilityandcounterterrorism