Streptococcus agalactiae carriage among pregnant women living in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, over a period of eight years.

Group B Streptococcus (GBS) carriage by pregnant women is the primary risk factor for early-onset GBS neonatal sepsis. Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) can prevent this transmission route, and two main approaches are recommended to base the selection of pregnant women to be submitted to IAP:...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ana Caroline N Botelho, Juliana G Oliveira, Andreia P Damasco, Késia T B Santos, Ana Flávia M Ferreira, Gabriel T Rocha, Penélope S Marinho, Rita B G Bornia, Tatiana C A Pinto, Marco A Américo, Sergio E L Fracalanzza, Lúcia M Teixeira
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5947911?pdf=render
_version_ 1798045590805807104
author Ana Caroline N Botelho
Juliana G Oliveira
Andreia P Damasco
Késia T B Santos
Ana Flávia M Ferreira
Gabriel T Rocha
Penélope S Marinho
Rita B G Bornia
Tatiana C A Pinto
Marco A Américo
Sergio E L Fracalanzza
Lúcia M Teixeira
author_facet Ana Caroline N Botelho
Juliana G Oliveira
Andreia P Damasco
Késia T B Santos
Ana Flávia M Ferreira
Gabriel T Rocha
Penélope S Marinho
Rita B G Bornia
Tatiana C A Pinto
Marco A Américo
Sergio E L Fracalanzza
Lúcia M Teixeira
author_sort Ana Caroline N Botelho
collection DOAJ
description Group B Streptococcus (GBS) carriage by pregnant women is the primary risk factor for early-onset GBS neonatal sepsis. Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) can prevent this transmission route, and two main approaches are recommended to base the selection of pregnant women to be submitted to IAP: the risk-based and the culture-based strategies. In Brazil, compliance to such recommendations is poor, and not much is known about GBS carriage. In the present study, 3,647 pregnant women living in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil, were screened for GBS anogenital colonization, over a period of 8 years (2008-2015). GBS was detected in 956 (26.2%) of them, and presence of vaginal discharge was the only trait associated with a higher risk for GBS colonization. Serotypes Ia (257; 37.3%) and II (137; 19.9%) were the most frequent among 689 (72.1% of the total) GBS isolates evaluated, followed by NT isolates (84; 12.1%), serotype Ib (77; 11.1%), V (63; 9.1%), III (47; 6.8%) and IV (24; 3.5%). Estimated coverage of major serotype-based GBS vaccines currently under clinical trials would vary from 65.2% to 84.3%. All 689 isolates tested were susceptible to ampicillin and vancomycin. Resistance to chloramphenicol, clindamycin, erythromycin, levofloxacin, and tetracycline was observed in 5% (35), 2% (14), 14% (97), 5% (35) and 86% (592) of the isolates, respectively. No significant fluctuations in colonization rates, serotype distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles were observed throughout the period of time investigated. The culture-based approach for IAP recommendation showed to be the best choice for the population investigated when compared to the risk-based, since the first did not increase the number of pregnant women submitted to antibiotic therapy and covered a larger number of women who were actually colonized by GBS. The fact the not all isolates were available for additional characterization, and serotype IX antiserum was not available for testing represent limitations of this study. Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, this is the largest investigation on GBS carriage among pregnant women in Brazil up to date, and results are useful for improving GBS prevention and treatment strategies.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T23:23:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8d20718bcb31491a86233f767c422f22
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T23:23:30Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-8d20718bcb31491a86233f767c422f222022-12-22T03:57:23ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01135e019692510.1371/journal.pone.0196925Streptococcus agalactiae carriage among pregnant women living in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, over a period of eight years.Ana Caroline N BotelhoJuliana G OliveiraAndreia P DamascoKésia T B SantosAna Flávia M FerreiraGabriel T RochaPenélope S MarinhoRita B G BorniaTatiana C A PintoMarco A AméricoSergio E L FracalanzzaLúcia M TeixeiraGroup B Streptococcus (GBS) carriage by pregnant women is the primary risk factor for early-onset GBS neonatal sepsis. Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) can prevent this transmission route, and two main approaches are recommended to base the selection of pregnant women to be submitted to IAP: the risk-based and the culture-based strategies. In Brazil, compliance to such recommendations is poor, and not much is known about GBS carriage. In the present study, 3,647 pregnant women living in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil, were screened for GBS anogenital colonization, over a period of 8 years (2008-2015). GBS was detected in 956 (26.2%) of them, and presence of vaginal discharge was the only trait associated with a higher risk for GBS colonization. Serotypes Ia (257; 37.3%) and II (137; 19.9%) were the most frequent among 689 (72.1% of the total) GBS isolates evaluated, followed by NT isolates (84; 12.1%), serotype Ib (77; 11.1%), V (63; 9.1%), III (47; 6.8%) and IV (24; 3.5%). Estimated coverage of major serotype-based GBS vaccines currently under clinical trials would vary from 65.2% to 84.3%. All 689 isolates tested were susceptible to ampicillin and vancomycin. Resistance to chloramphenicol, clindamycin, erythromycin, levofloxacin, and tetracycline was observed in 5% (35), 2% (14), 14% (97), 5% (35) and 86% (592) of the isolates, respectively. No significant fluctuations in colonization rates, serotype distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles were observed throughout the period of time investigated. The culture-based approach for IAP recommendation showed to be the best choice for the population investigated when compared to the risk-based, since the first did not increase the number of pregnant women submitted to antibiotic therapy and covered a larger number of women who were actually colonized by GBS. The fact the not all isolates were available for additional characterization, and serotype IX antiserum was not available for testing represent limitations of this study. Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, this is the largest investigation on GBS carriage among pregnant women in Brazil up to date, and results are useful for improving GBS prevention and treatment strategies.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5947911?pdf=render
spellingShingle Ana Caroline N Botelho
Juliana G Oliveira
Andreia P Damasco
Késia T B Santos
Ana Flávia M Ferreira
Gabriel T Rocha
Penélope S Marinho
Rita B G Bornia
Tatiana C A Pinto
Marco A Américo
Sergio E L Fracalanzza
Lúcia M Teixeira
Streptococcus agalactiae carriage among pregnant women living in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, over a period of eight years.
PLoS ONE
title Streptococcus agalactiae carriage among pregnant women living in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, over a period of eight years.
title_full Streptococcus agalactiae carriage among pregnant women living in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, over a period of eight years.
title_fullStr Streptococcus agalactiae carriage among pregnant women living in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, over a period of eight years.
title_full_unstemmed Streptococcus agalactiae carriage among pregnant women living in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, over a period of eight years.
title_short Streptococcus agalactiae carriage among pregnant women living in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, over a period of eight years.
title_sort streptococcus agalactiae carriage among pregnant women living in rio de janeiro brazil over a period of eight years
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5947911?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT anacarolinenbotelho streptococcusagalactiaecarriageamongpregnantwomenlivinginriodejaneirobraziloveraperiodofeightyears
AT julianagoliveira streptococcusagalactiaecarriageamongpregnantwomenlivinginriodejaneirobraziloveraperiodofeightyears
AT andreiapdamasco streptococcusagalactiaecarriageamongpregnantwomenlivinginriodejaneirobraziloveraperiodofeightyears
AT kesiatbsantos streptococcusagalactiaecarriageamongpregnantwomenlivinginriodejaneirobraziloveraperiodofeightyears
AT anaflaviamferreira streptococcusagalactiaecarriageamongpregnantwomenlivinginriodejaneirobraziloveraperiodofeightyears
AT gabrieltrocha streptococcusagalactiaecarriageamongpregnantwomenlivinginriodejaneirobraziloveraperiodofeightyears
AT penelopesmarinho streptococcusagalactiaecarriageamongpregnantwomenlivinginriodejaneirobraziloveraperiodofeightyears
AT ritabgbornia streptococcusagalactiaecarriageamongpregnantwomenlivinginriodejaneirobraziloveraperiodofeightyears
AT tatianacapinto streptococcusagalactiaecarriageamongpregnantwomenlivinginriodejaneirobraziloveraperiodofeightyears
AT marcoaamerico streptococcusagalactiaecarriageamongpregnantwomenlivinginriodejaneirobraziloveraperiodofeightyears
AT sergioelfracalanzza streptococcusagalactiaecarriageamongpregnantwomenlivinginriodejaneirobraziloveraperiodofeightyears
AT luciamteixeira streptococcusagalactiaecarriageamongpregnantwomenlivinginriodejaneirobraziloveraperiodofeightyears