Accelerometer-measured absolute versus relative physical activity intensity: cross-sectional associations with cardiometabolic health in midlife

Abstract Background Observational studies investigating the association between accelerometer-measured physical activity and health all use absolute measures of physical activity intensity. However, intervention studies suggest that the physical activity intensity required to improve health is relat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jonatan Fridolfsson, Daniel Arvidsson, Elin Ekblom-Bak, Örjan Ekblom, Göran Bergström, Mats Börjesson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-11-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17281-4
_version_ 1827632926737563648
author Jonatan Fridolfsson
Daniel Arvidsson
Elin Ekblom-Bak
Örjan Ekblom
Göran Bergström
Mats Börjesson
author_facet Jonatan Fridolfsson
Daniel Arvidsson
Elin Ekblom-Bak
Örjan Ekblom
Göran Bergström
Mats Börjesson
author_sort Jonatan Fridolfsson
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Observational studies investigating the association between accelerometer-measured physical activity and health all use absolute measures of physical activity intensity. However, intervention studies suggest that the physical activity intensity required to improve health is relative to individual fitness. The aim of this study was to investigate the associations between accelerometer-measured absolute and relative physical activity intensity and cardiometabolic health, and what implications these associations may have on the interpretation of health-associated physical activity. Methods A sample of the cross-sectional Swedish CArdioPulmonary bioImage Study (SCAPIS) consisting of 4,234 men and women aged 55–64 years was studied. Physical activity intensity was measured by accelerometry and expressed as absolute (e.g., metabolic equivalents of task) or relative (percentage of maximal oxygen consumption). Fitness was estimated by the submaximal Ekblom-Bak test. A composite (‘metabolic syndrome’) score combined measures of waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein, triglycerides, and glycated hemoglobin. Associations of absolute and relative physical activity intensity with the health indicators (i.e., fitness and metabolic syndrome score) were studied by partial least squares regression. Analyses were stratified by fitness level. Results Both absolute and relative physical activity intensity associated with the health indicators. However, the strongest associations for absolute intensity varied depending on fitness levels, whereas the associations for relative intensity were more synchronized across fitness groups. The dose–response relationship between moderate-to-vigorous intensity and the health indicators was stronger for relative than for absolute intensity. The absolute and relative moderate-to-vigorous intensity cut-offs intersected at the 5th fitness percentile, indicating that the absolute intensity cut-off is too low for 95% of individuals in this sample. While 99% of individuals fulfilled the general physical activity recommendations based on absolute intensity measures, only 21% fulfilled the recommendations based on relative intensity measures. In relation to a “sufficient” fitness level, 9% fulfilled the recommendations. Conclusions Accelerometer-measured relative physical activity intensity represents the intensity related to health benefits regardless of fitness level. Traditional absolute moderate intensity accelerometer cut-offs are too low for most individuals and should be adapted to the fitness level in the sample studied. Absolute and relative physical activity intensity cannot be used interchangeably.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T14:51:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8d20fc0c828f479caf3f95e153121bd3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2458
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T14:51:25Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj.art-8d20fc0c828f479caf3f95e153121bd32023-11-26T14:26:06ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582023-11-0123111210.1186/s12889-023-17281-4Accelerometer-measured absolute versus relative physical activity intensity: cross-sectional associations with cardiometabolic health in midlifeJonatan Fridolfsson0Daniel Arvidsson1Elin Ekblom-Bak2Örjan Ekblom3Göran Bergström4Mats Börjesson5Center for Health and Performance, Department of Food and Nutrition and Sport Science, Faculty of Education, University of GothenburgCenter for Health and Performance, Department of Food and Nutrition and Sport Science, Faculty of Education, University of GothenburgDepartment of Physical Activity and Health, Swedish School of Sport and Health SciencesDepartment of Physical Activity and Health, Swedish School of Sport and Health SciencesDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of GothenburgCenter for Lifestyle Intervention, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of GothenburgAbstract Background Observational studies investigating the association between accelerometer-measured physical activity and health all use absolute measures of physical activity intensity. However, intervention studies suggest that the physical activity intensity required to improve health is relative to individual fitness. The aim of this study was to investigate the associations between accelerometer-measured absolute and relative physical activity intensity and cardiometabolic health, and what implications these associations may have on the interpretation of health-associated physical activity. Methods A sample of the cross-sectional Swedish CArdioPulmonary bioImage Study (SCAPIS) consisting of 4,234 men and women aged 55–64 years was studied. Physical activity intensity was measured by accelerometry and expressed as absolute (e.g., metabolic equivalents of task) or relative (percentage of maximal oxygen consumption). Fitness was estimated by the submaximal Ekblom-Bak test. A composite (‘metabolic syndrome’) score combined measures of waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein, triglycerides, and glycated hemoglobin. Associations of absolute and relative physical activity intensity with the health indicators (i.e., fitness and metabolic syndrome score) were studied by partial least squares regression. Analyses were stratified by fitness level. Results Both absolute and relative physical activity intensity associated with the health indicators. However, the strongest associations for absolute intensity varied depending on fitness levels, whereas the associations for relative intensity were more synchronized across fitness groups. The dose–response relationship between moderate-to-vigorous intensity and the health indicators was stronger for relative than for absolute intensity. The absolute and relative moderate-to-vigorous intensity cut-offs intersected at the 5th fitness percentile, indicating that the absolute intensity cut-off is too low for 95% of individuals in this sample. While 99% of individuals fulfilled the general physical activity recommendations based on absolute intensity measures, only 21% fulfilled the recommendations based on relative intensity measures. In relation to a “sufficient” fitness level, 9% fulfilled the recommendations. Conclusions Accelerometer-measured relative physical activity intensity represents the intensity related to health benefits regardless of fitness level. Traditional absolute moderate intensity accelerometer cut-offs are too low for most individuals and should be adapted to the fitness level in the sample studied. Absolute and relative physical activity intensity cannot be used interchangeably.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17281-4Cardiometabolic risk factorsCardiovascular diseaseCardiovascular fitnessRecommendations
spellingShingle Jonatan Fridolfsson
Daniel Arvidsson
Elin Ekblom-Bak
Örjan Ekblom
Göran Bergström
Mats Börjesson
Accelerometer-measured absolute versus relative physical activity intensity: cross-sectional associations with cardiometabolic health in midlife
BMC Public Health
Cardiometabolic risk factors
Cardiovascular disease
Cardiovascular fitness
Recommendations
title Accelerometer-measured absolute versus relative physical activity intensity: cross-sectional associations with cardiometabolic health in midlife
title_full Accelerometer-measured absolute versus relative physical activity intensity: cross-sectional associations with cardiometabolic health in midlife
title_fullStr Accelerometer-measured absolute versus relative physical activity intensity: cross-sectional associations with cardiometabolic health in midlife
title_full_unstemmed Accelerometer-measured absolute versus relative physical activity intensity: cross-sectional associations with cardiometabolic health in midlife
title_short Accelerometer-measured absolute versus relative physical activity intensity: cross-sectional associations with cardiometabolic health in midlife
title_sort accelerometer measured absolute versus relative physical activity intensity cross sectional associations with cardiometabolic health in midlife
topic Cardiometabolic risk factors
Cardiovascular disease
Cardiovascular fitness
Recommendations
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17281-4
work_keys_str_mv AT jonatanfridolfsson accelerometermeasuredabsoluteversusrelativephysicalactivityintensitycrosssectionalassociationswithcardiometabolichealthinmidlife
AT danielarvidsson accelerometermeasuredabsoluteversusrelativephysicalactivityintensitycrosssectionalassociationswithcardiometabolichealthinmidlife
AT elinekblombak accelerometermeasuredabsoluteversusrelativephysicalactivityintensitycrosssectionalassociationswithcardiometabolichealthinmidlife
AT orjanekblom accelerometermeasuredabsoluteversusrelativephysicalactivityintensitycrosssectionalassociationswithcardiometabolichealthinmidlife
AT goranbergstrom accelerometermeasuredabsoluteversusrelativephysicalactivityintensitycrosssectionalassociationswithcardiometabolichealthinmidlife
AT matsborjesson accelerometermeasuredabsoluteversusrelativephysicalactivityintensitycrosssectionalassociationswithcardiometabolichealthinmidlife