Maximum Refractive Index of an Atomic Medium
It is interesting to observe that all optical materials with a positive refractive index have a value of index that is of order unity. Surprisingly, though, a deep understanding of the mechanisms that lead to this universal behavior seems to be lacking. Moreover, this observation is difficult to rec...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
American Physical Society
2021-02-01
|
| Series: | Physical Review X |
| Online Access: | http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.011026 |
| _version_ | 1818424770766569472 |
|---|---|
| author | Francesco Andreoli Michael J. Gullans Alexander A. High Antoine Browaeys Darrick E. Chang |
| author_facet | Francesco Andreoli Michael J. Gullans Alexander A. High Antoine Browaeys Darrick E. Chang |
| author_sort | Francesco Andreoli |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | It is interesting to observe that all optical materials with a positive refractive index have a value of index that is of order unity. Surprisingly, though, a deep understanding of the mechanisms that lead to this universal behavior seems to be lacking. Moreover, this observation is difficult to reconcile with the fact that a single isolated atom is known to have a giant optical response, as characterized by a resonant scattering cross section that far exceeds its physical size. Here, we theoretically and numerically investigate the evolution of the optical properties of an ensemble of ideal atoms as a function of density, starting from the dilute gas limit, including the effects of multiple scattering and near-field interactions. Interestingly, despite the giant response of an isolated atom, we find that the maximum index does not indefinitely grow with increasing density but rather reaches a limiting value of n≈1.7. This limit arises purely from electrodynamics, as it occurs at densities far below those where chemical processes become important. We propose an explanation based upon strong-disorder renormalization group theory, in which the near-field interaction combined with random atomic positions results in an inhomogeneous broadening of atomic resonance frequencies. This mechanism ensures that, regardless of the physical atomic density, light at any given frequency only interacts with at most a few near-resonant atoms per cubic wavelength, thus limiting the maximum index attainable. Our work is a promising first step to understand the limits of the refractive index from a bottom-up, atomic physics perspective, and it also introduces the renormalization group as a powerful tool to understand the generally complex problem of multiple scattering of light overall. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-14T14:03:20Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-8d2183f95ec443508cf08c3d890fbadd |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2160-3308 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-14T14:03:20Z |
| publishDate | 2021-02-01 |
| publisher | American Physical Society |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Physical Review X |
| spelling | doaj.art-8d2183f95ec443508cf08c3d890fbadd2022-12-21T22:58:40ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review X2160-33082021-02-0111101102610.1103/PhysRevX.11.011026Maximum Refractive Index of an Atomic MediumFrancesco AndreoliMichael J. GullansAlexander A. HighAntoine BrowaeysDarrick E. ChangIt is interesting to observe that all optical materials with a positive refractive index have a value of index that is of order unity. Surprisingly, though, a deep understanding of the mechanisms that lead to this universal behavior seems to be lacking. Moreover, this observation is difficult to reconcile with the fact that a single isolated atom is known to have a giant optical response, as characterized by a resonant scattering cross section that far exceeds its physical size. Here, we theoretically and numerically investigate the evolution of the optical properties of an ensemble of ideal atoms as a function of density, starting from the dilute gas limit, including the effects of multiple scattering and near-field interactions. Interestingly, despite the giant response of an isolated atom, we find that the maximum index does not indefinitely grow with increasing density but rather reaches a limiting value of n≈1.7. This limit arises purely from electrodynamics, as it occurs at densities far below those where chemical processes become important. We propose an explanation based upon strong-disorder renormalization group theory, in which the near-field interaction combined with random atomic positions results in an inhomogeneous broadening of atomic resonance frequencies. This mechanism ensures that, regardless of the physical atomic density, light at any given frequency only interacts with at most a few near-resonant atoms per cubic wavelength, thus limiting the maximum index attainable. Our work is a promising first step to understand the limits of the refractive index from a bottom-up, atomic physics perspective, and it also introduces the renormalization group as a powerful tool to understand the generally complex problem of multiple scattering of light overall.http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.011026 |
| spellingShingle | Francesco Andreoli Michael J. Gullans Alexander A. High Antoine Browaeys Darrick E. Chang Maximum Refractive Index of an Atomic Medium Physical Review X |
| title | Maximum Refractive Index of an Atomic Medium |
| title_full | Maximum Refractive Index of an Atomic Medium |
| title_fullStr | Maximum Refractive Index of an Atomic Medium |
| title_full_unstemmed | Maximum Refractive Index of an Atomic Medium |
| title_short | Maximum Refractive Index of an Atomic Medium |
| title_sort | maximum refractive index of an atomic medium |
| url | http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.011026 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT francescoandreoli maximumrefractiveindexofanatomicmedium AT michaeljgullans maximumrefractiveindexofanatomicmedium AT alexanderahigh maximumrefractiveindexofanatomicmedium AT antoinebrowaeys maximumrefractiveindexofanatomicmedium AT darrickechang maximumrefractiveindexofanatomicmedium |