The implications of the glenoid angles and rotator cuff status in patients with osteoarthritis undergoing shoulder arthroplasty

Abstract Background The success of shoulder arthroplasty, both reverse and anatomical, depends on correcting the underlying glenoid deformity especially in patients with an osteoarthritis. We hypothesized that the distribution of glenoid version and especially inclination are underestimated in the s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Omer Ozel, Robert Hudek, Mohamed S. Abdrabou, Birgit S. Werner, Frank Gohlke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-10-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-020-03690-8
_version_ 1818442096396206080
author Omer Ozel
Robert Hudek
Mohamed S. Abdrabou
Birgit S. Werner
Frank Gohlke
author_facet Omer Ozel
Robert Hudek
Mohamed S. Abdrabou
Birgit S. Werner
Frank Gohlke
author_sort Omer Ozel
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The success of shoulder arthroplasty, both reverse and anatomical, depends on correcting the underlying glenoid deformity especially in patients with an osteoarthritis. We hypothesized that the distribution of glenoid version and especially inclination are underestimated in the shoulder arthritis population, and also that superior glenoid inclination can be detected through 3-dimensional (3D) software program of computed tomography (CT) to a greater proportion in patients with rotator cuff insufficiency, but also in patients with osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff. Because of the influence of rotator cuff imbalance on secondary glenoid wear the values of the critical shoulder angle (CSA) and the fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff are further analyzed. The aim of our study is to determine; 1) the distribution of glenoid inclination and version; 2) the relationship between glenoid inclination, version, the critical shoulder angle (CSA) to the status of the rotator cuff; 3) the proportion of patients with both an intact rotator cuff and a superior inclination greater than 10°. Methods A total of 231 shoulders were evaluated with X-ray images, 3-dimentional (3D) software program of computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging. The cohort was divided into 3 groups according to their inclination angles and also grouped as intact-rotator cuff and torn-cuff group. Results The median (min/max) values for the 231 shoulders were 8° (− 23°/56°) for the inclination angle, − 11°(− 55°/23°) for the version angle, and 31.5°(17.6°/61.6°) for the CSA. The majority of the glenoids were found to show posterior-superior erosion. Glenoid inclination angle and CSA were significantly higher in torn-cuff group when compared with intact-cuff group (P < 0.001, both). The rotator cuff tears were statistically significant in high inclination group than low inclination group and no inclination group (p < 0.001). In the high inclination group, 41 of 105 (39%) shoulders had an intact rotator cuff, in about 18% of all shoulders. Conclusion Our findings show that 3D evaluation of glenoid inclination is mandatory for preoperative planning of shoulder replacement in order to properly assess superior inclination and that reverse shoulder arthroplasty may be considered more frequently than as previously expected, even when the rotator cuff is intact. Level of evidence Level III.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T18:38:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8d21aa3674e64824b8db8ecf32a0c98e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2474
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T18:38:43Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
spelling doaj.art-8d21aa3674e64824b8db8ecf32a0c98e2022-12-21T22:51:33ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742020-10-012111810.1186/s12891-020-03690-8The implications of the glenoid angles and rotator cuff status in patients with osteoarthritis undergoing shoulder arthroplastyOmer Ozel0Robert Hudek1Mohamed S. Abdrabou2Birgit S. Werner3Frank Gohlke4Department of Orthopaedics, Baskent University Istanbul HospitalDepartment of Shoulder Surgery, Rhön KlinikumDepartment of Shoulder Surgery, Rhön KlinikumDepartment of Shoulder Surgery, Rhön KlinikumDepartment of Shoulder Surgery, Rhön KlinikumAbstract Background The success of shoulder arthroplasty, both reverse and anatomical, depends on correcting the underlying glenoid deformity especially in patients with an osteoarthritis. We hypothesized that the distribution of glenoid version and especially inclination are underestimated in the shoulder arthritis population, and also that superior glenoid inclination can be detected through 3-dimensional (3D) software program of computed tomography (CT) to a greater proportion in patients with rotator cuff insufficiency, but also in patients with osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff. Because of the influence of rotator cuff imbalance on secondary glenoid wear the values of the critical shoulder angle (CSA) and the fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff are further analyzed. The aim of our study is to determine; 1) the distribution of glenoid inclination and version; 2) the relationship between glenoid inclination, version, the critical shoulder angle (CSA) to the status of the rotator cuff; 3) the proportion of patients with both an intact rotator cuff and a superior inclination greater than 10°. Methods A total of 231 shoulders were evaluated with X-ray images, 3-dimentional (3D) software program of computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging. The cohort was divided into 3 groups according to their inclination angles and also grouped as intact-rotator cuff and torn-cuff group. Results The median (min/max) values for the 231 shoulders were 8° (− 23°/56°) for the inclination angle, − 11°(− 55°/23°) for the version angle, and 31.5°(17.6°/61.6°) for the CSA. The majority of the glenoids were found to show posterior-superior erosion. Glenoid inclination angle and CSA were significantly higher in torn-cuff group when compared with intact-cuff group (P < 0.001, both). The rotator cuff tears were statistically significant in high inclination group than low inclination group and no inclination group (p < 0.001). In the high inclination group, 41 of 105 (39%) shoulders had an intact rotator cuff, in about 18% of all shoulders. Conclusion Our findings show that 3D evaluation of glenoid inclination is mandatory for preoperative planning of shoulder replacement in order to properly assess superior inclination and that reverse shoulder arthroplasty may be considered more frequently than as previously expected, even when the rotator cuff is intact. Level of evidence Level III.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-020-03690-8Shoulder arthritisRotator cuffGlenoid version anglesGlenoid inclination angles3D measurementsPreoperative planning
spellingShingle Omer Ozel
Robert Hudek
Mohamed S. Abdrabou
Birgit S. Werner
Frank Gohlke
The implications of the glenoid angles and rotator cuff status in patients with osteoarthritis undergoing shoulder arthroplasty
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Shoulder arthritis
Rotator cuff
Glenoid version angles
Glenoid inclination angles
3D measurements
Preoperative planning
title The implications of the glenoid angles and rotator cuff status in patients with osteoarthritis undergoing shoulder arthroplasty
title_full The implications of the glenoid angles and rotator cuff status in patients with osteoarthritis undergoing shoulder arthroplasty
title_fullStr The implications of the glenoid angles and rotator cuff status in patients with osteoarthritis undergoing shoulder arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed The implications of the glenoid angles and rotator cuff status in patients with osteoarthritis undergoing shoulder arthroplasty
title_short The implications of the glenoid angles and rotator cuff status in patients with osteoarthritis undergoing shoulder arthroplasty
title_sort implications of the glenoid angles and rotator cuff status in patients with osteoarthritis undergoing shoulder arthroplasty
topic Shoulder arthritis
Rotator cuff
Glenoid version angles
Glenoid inclination angles
3D measurements
Preoperative planning
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-020-03690-8
work_keys_str_mv AT omerozel theimplicationsoftheglenoidanglesandrotatorcuffstatusinpatientswithosteoarthritisundergoingshoulderarthroplasty
AT roberthudek theimplicationsoftheglenoidanglesandrotatorcuffstatusinpatientswithosteoarthritisundergoingshoulderarthroplasty
AT mohamedsabdrabou theimplicationsoftheglenoidanglesandrotatorcuffstatusinpatientswithosteoarthritisundergoingshoulderarthroplasty
AT birgitswerner theimplicationsoftheglenoidanglesandrotatorcuffstatusinpatientswithosteoarthritisundergoingshoulderarthroplasty
AT frankgohlke theimplicationsoftheglenoidanglesandrotatorcuffstatusinpatientswithosteoarthritisundergoingshoulderarthroplasty
AT omerozel implicationsoftheglenoidanglesandrotatorcuffstatusinpatientswithosteoarthritisundergoingshoulderarthroplasty
AT roberthudek implicationsoftheglenoidanglesandrotatorcuffstatusinpatientswithosteoarthritisundergoingshoulderarthroplasty
AT mohamedsabdrabou implicationsoftheglenoidanglesandrotatorcuffstatusinpatientswithosteoarthritisundergoingshoulderarthroplasty
AT birgitswerner implicationsoftheglenoidanglesandrotatorcuffstatusinpatientswithosteoarthritisundergoingshoulderarthroplasty
AT frankgohlke implicationsoftheglenoidanglesandrotatorcuffstatusinpatientswithosteoarthritisundergoingshoulderarthroplasty