Geographical Variations in the Clinical Management of Colorectal Cancer in Australia: A Systematic Review

BackgroundIn Australia, cancer survival is significantly lower in non-metropolitan compared to metropolitan areas. Our objective was to evaluate the evidence on geographical variations in the clinical management and treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC).MethodsA systematic review of published and gra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fiona Crawford-Williams, Sonja March, Michael J. Ireland, Arlen Rowe, Belinda Goodwin, Melissa K. Hyde, Suzanne K. Chambers, Joanne F. Aitken, Jeff Dunn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2018.00116/full
_version_ 1818559614439915520
author Fiona Crawford-Williams
Fiona Crawford-Williams
Sonja March
Sonja March
Michael J. Ireland
Michael J. Ireland
Arlen Rowe
Arlen Rowe
Belinda Goodwin
Belinda Goodwin
Melissa K. Hyde
Melissa K. Hyde
Suzanne K. Chambers
Suzanne K. Chambers
Suzanne K. Chambers
Suzanne K. Chambers
Suzanne K. Chambers
Joanne F. Aitken
Joanne F. Aitken
Joanne F. Aitken
Joanne F. Aitken
Jeff Dunn
Jeff Dunn
Jeff Dunn
Jeff Dunn
author_facet Fiona Crawford-Williams
Fiona Crawford-Williams
Sonja March
Sonja March
Michael J. Ireland
Michael J. Ireland
Arlen Rowe
Arlen Rowe
Belinda Goodwin
Belinda Goodwin
Melissa K. Hyde
Melissa K. Hyde
Suzanne K. Chambers
Suzanne K. Chambers
Suzanne K. Chambers
Suzanne K. Chambers
Suzanne K. Chambers
Joanne F. Aitken
Joanne F. Aitken
Joanne F. Aitken
Joanne F. Aitken
Jeff Dunn
Jeff Dunn
Jeff Dunn
Jeff Dunn
author_sort Fiona Crawford-Williams
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundIn Australia, cancer survival is significantly lower in non-metropolitan compared to metropolitan areas. Our objective was to evaluate the evidence on geographical variations in the clinical management and treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC).MethodsA systematic review of published and gray literature was conducted. Five databases (CINAHL, PubMed, Embase, ProQuest, and Informit) were searched for articles published in English from 1990 to 2018. Studies were included if they assessed differences in clinical management according to geographical location; focused on CRC patients; and were conducted in Australia. Included studies were critically appraised using a modified Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. PRISMA systematic review reporting methods were applied.Results17 articles met inclusion criteria. All were of high (53%) or moderate (47%) quality. The evidence available may suggest that patients in non-metropolitan areas are more likely to experience delays in surgery and are less likely to receive chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer and adjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer.ConclusionThe present review found limited information on clinical management across geographic regions in Australia and the synthesis highlights significant issues both for data collection and reporting at the population level, and for future research in the area of geographic variation. Where geographical disparities exist, these may be due to a combination of patient and system factors reflective of location. It is recommended that population-level data regarding clinical management of CRC be routinely collected to better understand geographical variations and inform future guidelines and policy.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T00:27:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8d4210dfea4245e8911e3f0c59da329b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2234-943X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T00:27:50Z
publishDate 2018-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Oncology
spelling doaj.art-8d4210dfea4245e8911e3f0c59da329b2022-12-21T23:24:59ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2018-05-01810.3389/fonc.2018.00116310535Geographical Variations in the Clinical Management of Colorectal Cancer in Australia: A Systematic ReviewFiona Crawford-Williams0Fiona Crawford-Williams1Sonja March2Sonja March3Michael J. Ireland4Michael J. Ireland5Arlen Rowe6Arlen Rowe7Belinda Goodwin8Belinda Goodwin9Melissa K. Hyde10Melissa K. Hyde11Suzanne K. Chambers12Suzanne K. Chambers13Suzanne K. Chambers14Suzanne K. Chambers15Suzanne K. Chambers16Joanne F. Aitken17Joanne F. Aitken18Joanne F. Aitken19Joanne F. Aitken20Jeff Dunn21Jeff Dunn22Jeff Dunn23Jeff Dunn24Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD, AustraliaSchool of Psychology and Counselling, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD, AustraliaInstitute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD, AustraliaSchool of Psychology and Counselling, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD, AustraliaInstitute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD, AustraliaSchool of Psychology and Counselling, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD, AustraliaInstitute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD, AustraliaSchool of Psychology and Counselling, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD, AustraliaInstitute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD, AustraliaSchool of Psychology and Counselling, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD, AustraliaCancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, QLD, AustraliaMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, AustraliaInstitute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD, AustraliaCancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, QLD, AustraliaMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, AustraliaProstate Cancer Foundation of Australia, St Leonards, NSW, AustraliaExercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, AustraliaInstitute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD, AustraliaCancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, QLD, AustraliaMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, AustraliaSchool of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaInstitute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD, AustraliaCancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, QLD, AustraliaSchool of Social Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaSchool of Medicine, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaBackgroundIn Australia, cancer survival is significantly lower in non-metropolitan compared to metropolitan areas. Our objective was to evaluate the evidence on geographical variations in the clinical management and treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC).MethodsA systematic review of published and gray literature was conducted. Five databases (CINAHL, PubMed, Embase, ProQuest, and Informit) were searched for articles published in English from 1990 to 2018. Studies were included if they assessed differences in clinical management according to geographical location; focused on CRC patients; and were conducted in Australia. Included studies were critically appraised using a modified Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. PRISMA systematic review reporting methods were applied.Results17 articles met inclusion criteria. All were of high (53%) or moderate (47%) quality. The evidence available may suggest that patients in non-metropolitan areas are more likely to experience delays in surgery and are less likely to receive chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer and adjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer.ConclusionThe present review found limited information on clinical management across geographic regions in Australia and the synthesis highlights significant issues both for data collection and reporting at the population level, and for future research in the area of geographic variation. Where geographical disparities exist, these may be due to a combination of patient and system factors reflective of location. It is recommended that population-level data regarding clinical management of CRC be routinely collected to better understand geographical variations and inform future guidelines and policy.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2018.00116/fullcolorectal cancerrural healthhealth disparitycancer treatmentsystematic review
spellingShingle Fiona Crawford-Williams
Fiona Crawford-Williams
Sonja March
Sonja March
Michael J. Ireland
Michael J. Ireland
Arlen Rowe
Arlen Rowe
Belinda Goodwin
Belinda Goodwin
Melissa K. Hyde
Melissa K. Hyde
Suzanne K. Chambers
Suzanne K. Chambers
Suzanne K. Chambers
Suzanne K. Chambers
Suzanne K. Chambers
Joanne F. Aitken
Joanne F. Aitken
Joanne F. Aitken
Joanne F. Aitken
Jeff Dunn
Jeff Dunn
Jeff Dunn
Jeff Dunn
Geographical Variations in the Clinical Management of Colorectal Cancer in Australia: A Systematic Review
Frontiers in Oncology
colorectal cancer
rural health
health disparity
cancer treatment
systematic review
title Geographical Variations in the Clinical Management of Colorectal Cancer in Australia: A Systematic Review
title_full Geographical Variations in the Clinical Management of Colorectal Cancer in Australia: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Geographical Variations in the Clinical Management of Colorectal Cancer in Australia: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Geographical Variations in the Clinical Management of Colorectal Cancer in Australia: A Systematic Review
title_short Geographical Variations in the Clinical Management of Colorectal Cancer in Australia: A Systematic Review
title_sort geographical variations in the clinical management of colorectal cancer in australia a systematic review
topic colorectal cancer
rural health
health disparity
cancer treatment
systematic review
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2018.00116/full
work_keys_str_mv AT fionacrawfordwilliams geographicalvariationsintheclinicalmanagementofcolorectalcancerinaustraliaasystematicreview
AT fionacrawfordwilliams geographicalvariationsintheclinicalmanagementofcolorectalcancerinaustraliaasystematicreview
AT sonjamarch geographicalvariationsintheclinicalmanagementofcolorectalcancerinaustraliaasystematicreview
AT sonjamarch geographicalvariationsintheclinicalmanagementofcolorectalcancerinaustraliaasystematicreview
AT michaeljireland geographicalvariationsintheclinicalmanagementofcolorectalcancerinaustraliaasystematicreview
AT michaeljireland geographicalvariationsintheclinicalmanagementofcolorectalcancerinaustraliaasystematicreview
AT arlenrowe geographicalvariationsintheclinicalmanagementofcolorectalcancerinaustraliaasystematicreview
AT arlenrowe geographicalvariationsintheclinicalmanagementofcolorectalcancerinaustraliaasystematicreview
AT belindagoodwin geographicalvariationsintheclinicalmanagementofcolorectalcancerinaustraliaasystematicreview
AT belindagoodwin geographicalvariationsintheclinicalmanagementofcolorectalcancerinaustraliaasystematicreview
AT melissakhyde geographicalvariationsintheclinicalmanagementofcolorectalcancerinaustraliaasystematicreview
AT melissakhyde geographicalvariationsintheclinicalmanagementofcolorectalcancerinaustraliaasystematicreview
AT suzannekchambers geographicalvariationsintheclinicalmanagementofcolorectalcancerinaustraliaasystematicreview
AT suzannekchambers geographicalvariationsintheclinicalmanagementofcolorectalcancerinaustraliaasystematicreview
AT suzannekchambers geographicalvariationsintheclinicalmanagementofcolorectalcancerinaustraliaasystematicreview
AT suzannekchambers geographicalvariationsintheclinicalmanagementofcolorectalcancerinaustraliaasystematicreview
AT suzannekchambers geographicalvariationsintheclinicalmanagementofcolorectalcancerinaustraliaasystematicreview
AT joannefaitken geographicalvariationsintheclinicalmanagementofcolorectalcancerinaustraliaasystematicreview
AT joannefaitken geographicalvariationsintheclinicalmanagementofcolorectalcancerinaustraliaasystematicreview
AT joannefaitken geographicalvariationsintheclinicalmanagementofcolorectalcancerinaustraliaasystematicreview
AT joannefaitken geographicalvariationsintheclinicalmanagementofcolorectalcancerinaustraliaasystematicreview
AT jeffdunn geographicalvariationsintheclinicalmanagementofcolorectalcancerinaustraliaasystematicreview
AT jeffdunn geographicalvariationsintheclinicalmanagementofcolorectalcancerinaustraliaasystematicreview
AT jeffdunn geographicalvariationsintheclinicalmanagementofcolorectalcancerinaustraliaasystematicreview
AT jeffdunn geographicalvariationsintheclinicalmanagementofcolorectalcancerinaustraliaasystematicreview