Financial incentives to improve adherence: more clarity about their purpose may help the debate
Financial incentives for medication adherence have been controversial in mental healthcare. Much of the debate, however, may be based on a misconception of what financial incentives are and what their purpose is. Financial incentives are not meant to influence informed consent about treatment decisi...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2023-06-01
|
Series: | BJPsych Bulletin |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2056469423000049/type/journal_article |
_version_ | 1828718192054239232 |
---|---|
author | Stefan Priebe |
author_facet | Stefan Priebe |
author_sort | Stefan Priebe |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Financial incentives for medication adherence have been controversial in mental healthcare. Much of the debate, however, may be based on a misconception of what financial incentives are and what their purpose is. Financial incentives are not meant to influence informed consent about treatment decisions, but to bridge the gap between intentions and behaviour and help patients achieve adherence to a treatment that they have agreed to. In this context, patients’ positive views may reflect that the use of financial incentives can support a good therapeutic relationship rather than undermine it. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T14:40:13Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-8d42d3d4a5a94a00acffa46361100e17 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2056-4694 2056-4708 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T14:40:13Z |
publishDate | 2023-06-01 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | Article |
series | BJPsych Bulletin |
spelling | doaj.art-8d42d3d4a5a94a00acffa46361100e172023-08-16T11:00:53ZengCambridge University PressBJPsych Bulletin2056-46942056-47082023-06-014712512610.1192/bjb.2023.4Financial incentives to improve adherence: more clarity about their purpose may help the debateStefan Priebe0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9864-3394Queen Mary University of London, London, UKFinancial incentives for medication adherence have been controversial in mental healthcare. Much of the debate, however, may be based on a misconception of what financial incentives are and what their purpose is. Financial incentives are not meant to influence informed consent about treatment decisions, but to bridge the gap between intentions and behaviour and help patients achieve adherence to a treatment that they have agreed to. In this context, patients’ positive views may reflect that the use of financial incentives can support a good therapeutic relationship rather than undermine it.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2056469423000049/type/journal_articleFinancial incentivesadherencemedicationmental illnesspsychiatry |
spellingShingle | Stefan Priebe Financial incentives to improve adherence: more clarity about their purpose may help the debate BJPsych Bulletin Financial incentives adherence medication mental illness psychiatry |
title | Financial incentives to improve adherence: more clarity about their purpose may help the debate |
title_full | Financial incentives to improve adherence: more clarity about their purpose may help the debate |
title_fullStr | Financial incentives to improve adherence: more clarity about their purpose may help the debate |
title_full_unstemmed | Financial incentives to improve adherence: more clarity about their purpose may help the debate |
title_short | Financial incentives to improve adherence: more clarity about their purpose may help the debate |
title_sort | financial incentives to improve adherence more clarity about their purpose may help the debate |
topic | Financial incentives adherence medication mental illness psychiatry |
url | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2056469423000049/type/journal_article |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stefanpriebe financialincentivestoimproveadherencemoreclarityabouttheirpurposemayhelpthedebate |