Account for Clinical Heterogeneity in Assessment of Catheter-based Renal Denervation among Resistant Hypertension Patients: Subgroup Meta-analysis

Background: Catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) is a novel treatment for resistant hypertension (RH). A recent meta-analysis reported that RDN did not significantly reduce blood pressure (BP) based on the pooled effects with mild to severe heterogeneity. The aim of the present study was to identi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiao-Han Chen, Sehee Kim, Xiao-Xi Zeng, Zhi-Bing Chen, Tian-Lei Cui, Zhang-Xue Hu, Yi Li, Ping Fu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2017-01-01
Series:Chinese Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.cmj.org/article.asp?issn=0366-6999;year=2017;volume=130;issue=13;spage=1586;epage=1594;aulast=Chen
_version_ 1818038041460080640
author Xiao-Han Chen
Sehee Kim
Xiao-Xi Zeng
Zhi-Bing Chen
Tian-Lei Cui
Zhang-Xue Hu
Yi Li
Ping Fu
author_facet Xiao-Han Chen
Sehee Kim
Xiao-Xi Zeng
Zhi-Bing Chen
Tian-Lei Cui
Zhang-Xue Hu
Yi Li
Ping Fu
author_sort Xiao-Han Chen
collection DOAJ
description Background: Catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) is a novel treatment for resistant hypertension (RH). A recent meta-analysis reported that RDN did not significantly reduce blood pressure (BP) based on the pooled effects with mild to severe heterogeneity. The aim of the present study was to identify and reduce clinical sources of heterogeneity and reassess the safety and efficacy of RDN within the identified homogeneous subpopulations. Methods: This was a meta-analysis of 9 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) among patients with RH up to June 2016. Sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses were extensively conducted by baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) level, antihypertensive medication change rates, and coronary heart disease (CHD). Results: In all patients with RH, no statistical differences were found in mortality, severe cardiovascular events rate, and changes in 24-h SBP and office SBP at 6 and 12 months. However, subgroup analyses showed significant differences between the RDN and control groups. In the subpopulations with baseline 24-h SBP ≥155 mmHg (1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa) and the infrequently changed medication, the use of RDN resulted in a significant reduction in 24-h SBP level at 6 months (P = 0.100 and P= 0.009, respectively). Subgrouping RCTs with a higher prevalent CHD in control showed that the control treatment was significantly better than RDN in office SBP reduction at 6 months (P < 0.001). Conclusions: In all patients with RH, the catheter-based RDN is not more effective in lowering ambulatory or office BP than an optimized antihypertensive drug treatment at 6 and 12 months. However, among RH patients with higher baseline SBP, RDN might be more effective in reducing SBP.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T07:36:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8d45bdc534b642659730b3b809181217
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0366-6999
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T07:36:26Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format Article
series Chinese Medical Journal
spelling doaj.art-8d45bdc534b642659730b3b8091812172022-12-22T01:57:25ZengWolters KluwerChinese Medical Journal0366-69992017-01-01130131586159410.4103/0366-6999.208238Account for Clinical Heterogeneity in Assessment of Catheter-based Renal Denervation among Resistant Hypertension Patients: Subgroup Meta-analysisXiao-Han ChenSehee KimXiao-Xi ZengZhi-Bing ChenTian-Lei CuiZhang-Xue HuYi LiPing FuBackground: Catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) is a novel treatment for resistant hypertension (RH). A recent meta-analysis reported that RDN did not significantly reduce blood pressure (BP) based on the pooled effects with mild to severe heterogeneity. The aim of the present study was to identify and reduce clinical sources of heterogeneity and reassess the safety and efficacy of RDN within the identified homogeneous subpopulations. Methods: This was a meta-analysis of 9 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) among patients with RH up to June 2016. Sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses were extensively conducted by baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) level, antihypertensive medication change rates, and coronary heart disease (CHD). Results: In all patients with RH, no statistical differences were found in mortality, severe cardiovascular events rate, and changes in 24-h SBP and office SBP at 6 and 12 months. However, subgroup analyses showed significant differences between the RDN and control groups. In the subpopulations with baseline 24-h SBP ≥155 mmHg (1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa) and the infrequently changed medication, the use of RDN resulted in a significant reduction in 24-h SBP level at 6 months (P = 0.100 and P= 0.009, respectively). Subgrouping RCTs with a higher prevalent CHD in control showed that the control treatment was significantly better than RDN in office SBP reduction at 6 months (P < 0.001). Conclusions: In all patients with RH, the catheter-based RDN is not more effective in lowering ambulatory or office BP than an optimized antihypertensive drug treatment at 6 and 12 months. However, among RH patients with higher baseline SBP, RDN might be more effective in reducing SBP.http://www.cmj.org/article.asp?issn=0366-6999;year=2017;volume=130;issue=13;spage=1586;epage=1594;aulast=ChenAntihypertensive Treatment; Hypertension; Randomized Controlled Trials; Renal Denervation; Subgroup Meta-analysis
spellingShingle Xiao-Han Chen
Sehee Kim
Xiao-Xi Zeng
Zhi-Bing Chen
Tian-Lei Cui
Zhang-Xue Hu
Yi Li
Ping Fu
Account for Clinical Heterogeneity in Assessment of Catheter-based Renal Denervation among Resistant Hypertension Patients: Subgroup Meta-analysis
Chinese Medical Journal
Antihypertensive Treatment; Hypertension; Randomized Controlled Trials; Renal Denervation; Subgroup Meta-analysis
title Account for Clinical Heterogeneity in Assessment of Catheter-based Renal Denervation among Resistant Hypertension Patients: Subgroup Meta-analysis
title_full Account for Clinical Heterogeneity in Assessment of Catheter-based Renal Denervation among Resistant Hypertension Patients: Subgroup Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Account for Clinical Heterogeneity in Assessment of Catheter-based Renal Denervation among Resistant Hypertension Patients: Subgroup Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Account for Clinical Heterogeneity in Assessment of Catheter-based Renal Denervation among Resistant Hypertension Patients: Subgroup Meta-analysis
title_short Account for Clinical Heterogeneity in Assessment of Catheter-based Renal Denervation among Resistant Hypertension Patients: Subgroup Meta-analysis
title_sort account for clinical heterogeneity in assessment of catheter based renal denervation among resistant hypertension patients subgroup meta analysis
topic Antihypertensive Treatment; Hypertension; Randomized Controlled Trials; Renal Denervation; Subgroup Meta-analysis
url http://www.cmj.org/article.asp?issn=0366-6999;year=2017;volume=130;issue=13;spage=1586;epage=1594;aulast=Chen
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaohanchen accountforclinicalheterogeneityinassessmentofcatheterbasedrenaldenervationamongresistanthypertensionpatientssubgroupmetaanalysis
AT seheekim accountforclinicalheterogeneityinassessmentofcatheterbasedrenaldenervationamongresistanthypertensionpatientssubgroupmetaanalysis
AT xiaoxizeng accountforclinicalheterogeneityinassessmentofcatheterbasedrenaldenervationamongresistanthypertensionpatientssubgroupmetaanalysis
AT zhibingchen accountforclinicalheterogeneityinassessmentofcatheterbasedrenaldenervationamongresistanthypertensionpatientssubgroupmetaanalysis
AT tianleicui accountforclinicalheterogeneityinassessmentofcatheterbasedrenaldenervationamongresistanthypertensionpatientssubgroupmetaanalysis
AT zhangxuehu accountforclinicalheterogeneityinassessmentofcatheterbasedrenaldenervationamongresistanthypertensionpatientssubgroupmetaanalysis
AT yili accountforclinicalheterogeneityinassessmentofcatheterbasedrenaldenervationamongresistanthypertensionpatientssubgroupmetaanalysis
AT pingfu accountforclinicalheterogeneityinassessmentofcatheterbasedrenaldenervationamongresistanthypertensionpatientssubgroupmetaanalysis