Shakespeare’s The Tempest Revisited: Nietzsche and the Myth of the New World

The Tempest is the only play in the Shakespearean canon that is open to a purely “Americanist” reading. Although Prospero’s island is located somewhere in the Mediterranean, numerous critics claimed that it deals with the New World (Hulme & Sherman 2000: 171). The paper revisits the existing int...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Burzyńska Katarzyna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2019-03-01
Series:Studia Anglica Posnaniensia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/stap-2019-0011
_version_ 1818609310962286592
author Burzyńska Katarzyna
author_facet Burzyńska Katarzyna
author_sort Burzyńska Katarzyna
collection DOAJ
description The Tempest is the only play in the Shakespearean canon that is open to a purely “Americanist” reading. Although Prospero’s island is located somewhere in the Mediterranean, numerous critics claimed that it deals with the New World (Hulme & Sherman 2000: 171). The paper revisits the existing interpretations, focusing on the turbulent relationship between Prospero and other inhabitants of the island: Caliban, Miranda, and Ariel. In the article I propose a rereading of their relation in the spirit of Friedrich Nietzsche’s perspectivism, utilising Nietzsche’s key philosophical concepts like the Apollonian/Dionysian elements and der Übermensch (the overman). In his vast canon, Nietzsche refers to Native Americans only once and in passing. However, his call for the revaluation of all values seems to be an apt point of departure for a discussion on early colonial relations. Nietzsche’s perspectivism enables to reread both the early colonial encounters and character relations on Shakespeare’s island. Hence, in an attempt at a “combined analysis”, the paper looks at Prospero as the potential overman and also offers a reading of the English source texts that document early encounters between the English and native inhabitants of North America (Walter Raleigh, Richard Hakluyt, Thomas Harriot, Robert Gray).
first_indexed 2024-12-16T14:56:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8d52e6f9c8ce44e38ec817f61af6afdd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0081-6272
2082-5102
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T14:56:31Z
publishDate 2019-03-01
publisher Sciendo
record_format Article
series Studia Anglica Posnaniensia
spelling doaj.art-8d52e6f9c8ce44e38ec817f61af6afdd2022-12-21T22:27:25ZengSciendoStudia Anglica Posnaniensia0081-62722082-51022019-03-0154121924710.2478/stap-2019-0011stap-2019-0011Shakespeare’s The Tempest Revisited: Nietzsche and the Myth of the New WorldBurzyńska Katarzyna0Department of Studies in Culture, Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, ul. Grunwaldzka 6, 60–780Poznań, PolandThe Tempest is the only play in the Shakespearean canon that is open to a purely “Americanist” reading. Although Prospero’s island is located somewhere in the Mediterranean, numerous critics claimed that it deals with the New World (Hulme & Sherman 2000: 171). The paper revisits the existing interpretations, focusing on the turbulent relationship between Prospero and other inhabitants of the island: Caliban, Miranda, and Ariel. In the article I propose a rereading of their relation in the spirit of Friedrich Nietzsche’s perspectivism, utilising Nietzsche’s key philosophical concepts like the Apollonian/Dionysian elements and der Übermensch (the overman). In his vast canon, Nietzsche refers to Native Americans only once and in passing. However, his call for the revaluation of all values seems to be an apt point of departure for a discussion on early colonial relations. Nietzsche’s perspectivism enables to reread both the early colonial encounters and character relations on Shakespeare’s island. Hence, in an attempt at a “combined analysis”, the paper looks at Prospero as the potential overman and also offers a reading of the English source texts that document early encounters between the English and native inhabitants of North America (Walter Raleigh, Richard Hakluyt, Thomas Harriot, Robert Gray).https://doi.org/10.2478/stap-2019-0011shakespearenietzschethe tempestcolonial relationsthe new worldthe overmanapollonian impulsesdionysian impulses
spellingShingle Burzyńska Katarzyna
Shakespeare’s The Tempest Revisited: Nietzsche and the Myth of the New World
Studia Anglica Posnaniensia
shakespeare
nietzsche
the tempest
colonial relations
the new world
the overman
apollonian impulses
dionysian impulses
title Shakespeare’s The Tempest Revisited: Nietzsche and the Myth of the New World
title_full Shakespeare’s The Tempest Revisited: Nietzsche and the Myth of the New World
title_fullStr Shakespeare’s The Tempest Revisited: Nietzsche and the Myth of the New World
title_full_unstemmed Shakespeare’s The Tempest Revisited: Nietzsche and the Myth of the New World
title_short Shakespeare’s The Tempest Revisited: Nietzsche and the Myth of the New World
title_sort shakespeare s the tempest revisited nietzsche and the myth of the new world
topic shakespeare
nietzsche
the tempest
colonial relations
the new world
the overman
apollonian impulses
dionysian impulses
url https://doi.org/10.2478/stap-2019-0011
work_keys_str_mv AT burzynskakatarzyna shakespearesthetempestrevisitednietzscheandthemythofthenewworld