Quality of information about liposuction for the lay public: A scoping review
Introduction: This scoping review aims to analyze the quality of information about liposuction for the lay public. Method: A literature search was carried out from November 18 to December 12, 2021, on the following database platforms: Medline, Cochrane, LILACS, Embase, and VHL. The search s...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica
2023-12-01
|
Series: | Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.rbcp.org.br/export-pdf/3364/1983-5175-rbcp-38-04-e0766-en.pdf |
_version_ | 1827382842781335552 |
---|---|
author | Anderson Henrique da Silva Stahelin Juan Carlos Montano Pedroso André Hiroki Suyama Tsuji Caroline Melo da Silva Graziele Leite dos Santos Felipe Contoli Isoldi Lydia Masako Ferreira |
author_facet | Anderson Henrique da Silva Stahelin Juan Carlos Montano Pedroso André Hiroki Suyama Tsuji Caroline Melo da Silva Graziele Leite dos Santos Felipe Contoli Isoldi Lydia Masako Ferreira |
author_sort | Anderson Henrique da Silva Stahelin |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Introduction: This scoping review aims to analyze the quality of information about liposuction for the lay public.
Method: A literature search was carried out from November 18 to December 12, 2021, on the following database platforms: Medline, Cochrane, LILACS, Embase, and VHL. The search strategy involved the combination of several descriptors. Three independent investigators read the abstract of studies obtained using the search strategy to evaluate those that met the eligibility criteria.
Results: Initially, 33 articles were collected using the search strategy. Among these, 23 studies were excluded after reading the abstracts and evaluating the eligibility criteria, as they did not have outcomes of interest to the proposed topic. Thus, ten studies met the inclusion criteria, nine of which were cross-sectional and one literature review. Among the ten articles included, nine report that information about liposuction is poor and inaccurate.
Conclusion: The content on liposuction made available to the lay public via the Internet is, for the most part, unsatisfactory. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-08T14:28:13Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-8d5ad33bb75a4ab9b198d1ac044d869e |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1983-5175 2177-1235 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-08T14:28:13Z |
publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica |
record_format | Article |
series | Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica |
spelling | doaj.art-8d5ad33bb75a4ab9b198d1ac044d869e2024-01-12T17:56:46ZengSociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia PlásticaRevista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica1983-51752177-12352023-12-0138410.5935/2177-1235.2023RBCP0766-ENQuality of information about liposuction for the lay public: A scoping reviewAnderson Henrique da Silva Stahelin0Juan Carlos Montano Pedroso1André Hiroki Suyama Tsuji2Caroline Melo da Silva3Graziele Leite dos Santos4Felipe Contoli Isoldi5Lydia Masako Ferreira6Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, SP, BrazilIntroduction: This scoping review aims to analyze the quality of information about liposuction for the lay public. Method: A literature search was carried out from November 18 to December 12, 2021, on the following database platforms: Medline, Cochrane, LILACS, Embase, and VHL. The search strategy involved the combination of several descriptors. Three independent investigators read the abstract of studies obtained using the search strategy to evaluate those that met the eligibility criteria. Results: Initially, 33 articles were collected using the search strategy. Among these, 23 studies were excluded after reading the abstracts and evaluating the eligibility criteria, as they did not have outcomes of interest to the proposed topic. Thus, ten studies met the inclusion criteria, nine of which were cross-sectional and one literature review. Among the ten articles included, nine report that information about liposuction is poor and inaccurate. Conclusion: The content on liposuction made available to the lay public via the Internet is, for the most part, unsatisfactory.http://www.rbcp.org.br/export-pdf/3364/1983-5175-rbcp-38-04-e0766-en.pdflipectomylipolysisaccess to informationinformation disseminationhealth communication. |
spellingShingle | Anderson Henrique da Silva Stahelin Juan Carlos Montano Pedroso André Hiroki Suyama Tsuji Caroline Melo da Silva Graziele Leite dos Santos Felipe Contoli Isoldi Lydia Masako Ferreira Quality of information about liposuction for the lay public: A scoping review Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica lipectomy lipolysis access to information information dissemination health communication. |
title | Quality of information about liposuction for the lay public: A scoping review |
title_full | Quality of information about liposuction for the lay public: A scoping review |
title_fullStr | Quality of information about liposuction for the lay public: A scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality of information about liposuction for the lay public: A scoping review |
title_short | Quality of information about liposuction for the lay public: A scoping review |
title_sort | quality of information about liposuction for the lay public a scoping review |
topic | lipectomy lipolysis access to information information dissemination health communication. |
url | http://www.rbcp.org.br/export-pdf/3364/1983-5175-rbcp-38-04-e0766-en.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andersonhenriquedasilvastahelin qualityofinformationaboutliposuctionforthelaypublicascopingreview AT juancarlosmontanopedroso qualityofinformationaboutliposuctionforthelaypublicascopingreview AT andrehirokisuyamatsuji qualityofinformationaboutliposuctionforthelaypublicascopingreview AT carolinemelodasilva qualityofinformationaboutliposuctionforthelaypublicascopingreview AT grazieleleitedossantos qualityofinformationaboutliposuctionforthelaypublicascopingreview AT felipecontoliisoldi qualityofinformationaboutliposuctionforthelaypublicascopingreview AT lydiamasakoferreira qualityofinformationaboutliposuctionforthelaypublicascopingreview |