Zinc Oxide Zinc Sulfate versus Zinc Oxide Eugenol as Pulp Chamber Filling Materials in Primary Molar Pulpotomies
The long-term effect of Zinc oxide zinc sulfate (Coltosol<sup>®</sup>) dressing material on pulpotomy success and tooth survival has not yet been studied. This study compared the success rates of Zinc oxide zinc sulfate and zinc oxide eugenol as coronal dressing materials post radicular...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-09-01
|
| Series: | Children |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/8/9/776 |
| _version_ | 1797519843469033472 |
|---|---|
| author | Moti Moskovitz Nili Tickotsky Maayan Dassa Avia Fux-Noy Aviv Shmueli Elinor Halperson Diana Ram |
| author_facet | Moti Moskovitz Nili Tickotsky Maayan Dassa Avia Fux-Noy Aviv Shmueli Elinor Halperson Diana Ram |
| author_sort | Moti Moskovitz |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The long-term effect of Zinc oxide zinc sulfate (Coltosol<sup>®</sup>) dressing material on pulpotomy success and tooth survival has not yet been studied. This study compared the success rates of Zinc oxide zinc sulfate and zinc oxide eugenol as coronal dressing materials post radicular pulp amputation in primary teeth pulpotomies. This study included healthy two- to ten-year-old children who had pulpotomies on primary molars between 2012 and 2018 at the Pediatric Dentistry Clinic of the School of Dental Medicine. Data were analyzed at several follow-ups of up to 60 months. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate survival probabilities of Zinc oxide zinc sulfate versus zinc oxide eugenol. In the 107 children included in this study, 54 teeth were filled with Zinc oxide zinc sulfate and 53 were filled with zinc oxide eugenol. Follow-up ranged from 12.2 to 73.3 months. Overall survival of Coltosol<sup>®</sup> vs. IRM filled teeth was 87.1% and 79.3%, respectively. Overall survival probabilities for Coltosol<sup>®</sup>-filled teeth at 15.5, 24 and 45 months were 95%, 89.8% and 79.7%, respectively, while for IRM they were 93.7%, 83% and 67.7%, respectively. Treatment failure rates and type of treated teeth did not differ between boys and girls (<i>p</i>-value = 0.77 and 0.87, respectively). Zinc oxide zinc sulfate and zinc oxide eugenol exhibited comparable high long-term success rates of up to five years (<i>p</i> = 0.16). |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-10T07:48:32Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-8d5b5539523449ea933114f2b327d500 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2227-9067 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-10T07:48:32Z |
| publishDate | 2021-09-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Children |
| spelling | doaj.art-8d5b5539523449ea933114f2b327d5002023-11-22T12:29:53ZengMDPI AGChildren2227-90672021-09-018977610.3390/children8090776Zinc Oxide Zinc Sulfate versus Zinc Oxide Eugenol as Pulp Chamber Filling Materials in Primary Molar PulpotomiesMoti Moskovitz0Nili Tickotsky1Maayan Dassa2Avia Fux-Noy3Aviv Shmueli4Elinor Halperson5Diana Ram6Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 9112102, IsraelDepartment of Immunology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, IsraelHadassah School of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 9112102, IsraelDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 9112102, IsraelDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 9112102, IsraelDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 9112102, IsraelDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 9112102, IsraelThe long-term effect of Zinc oxide zinc sulfate (Coltosol<sup>®</sup>) dressing material on pulpotomy success and tooth survival has not yet been studied. This study compared the success rates of Zinc oxide zinc sulfate and zinc oxide eugenol as coronal dressing materials post radicular pulp amputation in primary teeth pulpotomies. This study included healthy two- to ten-year-old children who had pulpotomies on primary molars between 2012 and 2018 at the Pediatric Dentistry Clinic of the School of Dental Medicine. Data were analyzed at several follow-ups of up to 60 months. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate survival probabilities of Zinc oxide zinc sulfate versus zinc oxide eugenol. In the 107 children included in this study, 54 teeth were filled with Zinc oxide zinc sulfate and 53 were filled with zinc oxide eugenol. Follow-up ranged from 12.2 to 73.3 months. Overall survival of Coltosol<sup>®</sup> vs. IRM filled teeth was 87.1% and 79.3%, respectively. Overall survival probabilities for Coltosol<sup>®</sup>-filled teeth at 15.5, 24 and 45 months were 95%, 89.8% and 79.7%, respectively, while for IRM they were 93.7%, 83% and 67.7%, respectively. Treatment failure rates and type of treated teeth did not differ between boys and girls (<i>p</i>-value = 0.77 and 0.87, respectively). Zinc oxide zinc sulfate and zinc oxide eugenol exhibited comparable high long-term success rates of up to five years (<i>p</i> = 0.16).https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/8/9/776pulpotomyprimary molarsColtosol<sup>®</sup>intermediate restorative material (IRM) |
| spellingShingle | Moti Moskovitz Nili Tickotsky Maayan Dassa Avia Fux-Noy Aviv Shmueli Elinor Halperson Diana Ram Zinc Oxide Zinc Sulfate versus Zinc Oxide Eugenol as Pulp Chamber Filling Materials in Primary Molar Pulpotomies Children pulpotomy primary molars Coltosol<sup>®</sup> intermediate restorative material (IRM) |
| title | Zinc Oxide Zinc Sulfate versus Zinc Oxide Eugenol as Pulp Chamber Filling Materials in Primary Molar Pulpotomies |
| title_full | Zinc Oxide Zinc Sulfate versus Zinc Oxide Eugenol as Pulp Chamber Filling Materials in Primary Molar Pulpotomies |
| title_fullStr | Zinc Oxide Zinc Sulfate versus Zinc Oxide Eugenol as Pulp Chamber Filling Materials in Primary Molar Pulpotomies |
| title_full_unstemmed | Zinc Oxide Zinc Sulfate versus Zinc Oxide Eugenol as Pulp Chamber Filling Materials in Primary Molar Pulpotomies |
| title_short | Zinc Oxide Zinc Sulfate versus Zinc Oxide Eugenol as Pulp Chamber Filling Materials in Primary Molar Pulpotomies |
| title_sort | zinc oxide zinc sulfate versus zinc oxide eugenol as pulp chamber filling materials in primary molar pulpotomies |
| topic | pulpotomy primary molars Coltosol<sup>®</sup> intermediate restorative material (IRM) |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/8/9/776 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT motimoskovitz zincoxidezincsulfateversuszincoxideeugenolaspulpchamberfillingmaterialsinprimarymolarpulpotomies AT nilitickotsky zincoxidezincsulfateversuszincoxideeugenolaspulpchamberfillingmaterialsinprimarymolarpulpotomies AT maayandassa zincoxidezincsulfateversuszincoxideeugenolaspulpchamberfillingmaterialsinprimarymolarpulpotomies AT aviafuxnoy zincoxidezincsulfateversuszincoxideeugenolaspulpchamberfillingmaterialsinprimarymolarpulpotomies AT avivshmueli zincoxidezincsulfateversuszincoxideeugenolaspulpchamberfillingmaterialsinprimarymolarpulpotomies AT elinorhalperson zincoxidezincsulfateversuszincoxideeugenolaspulpchamberfillingmaterialsinprimarymolarpulpotomies AT dianaram zincoxidezincsulfateversuszincoxideeugenolaspulpchamberfillingmaterialsinprimarymolarpulpotomies |