Influence of Periprostatic Adiposity Measurement Parameters on Preoperative Staging and Grading of Prostate Cancer

Objective To analyze the influence of periprostatic fat on the difference of staging/grading before and after radical retropubic prostatectomy(RRP). Methods A total of 184 patients who underwent RRP were analyzed retrospectively. The different fat measurements were performed on the slices of MRI and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: ZHANG Qiang, SUN Lijiang, ZHANG Guiming, QI Jun, YANG Zhigang
Format: Article
Language:zho
Published: Magazine House of Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment 2018-07-01
Series:Zhongliu Fangzhi Yanjiu
Subjects:
Online Access:http://html.rhhz.net/ZLFZYJ/html/8578.2018.17.1382.htm
_version_ 1828452872839233536
author ZHANG Qiang
SUN Lijiang
ZHANG Guiming
QI Jun
YANG Zhigang
author_facet ZHANG Qiang
SUN Lijiang
ZHANG Guiming
QI Jun
YANG Zhigang
author_sort ZHANG Qiang
collection DOAJ
description Objective To analyze the influence of periprostatic fat on the difference of staging/grading before and after radical retropubic prostatectomy(RRP). Methods A total of 184 patients who underwent RRP were analyzed retrospectively. The different fat measurements were performed on the slices of MRI and compared with the clinical and pathologic factors using SPSS13.0. Results The PFA and Ratio showed a significant difference between the difference group and the no difference one in clinical stage before operation and pathologic stage after operation (P=0.014, P=0.037). A statistical association was revealed between the PFA/Ratio and the difference of grading in pre-/post-RRP (P=0.031, P=0.002). In terms of Gleason score, nothing but "PFA" fat measurement was found to be different between two groups (P=0.017); Logistic regression analysis revealed a statistical association between the PFA/T-zone volume and the difference of grading in pre-/post-RRP (P=0.018, P=0.028). Conclusion The periprostatic adipose has effect on accurate evaluation of preoperative staging and grading of PCa.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T23:59:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8d6d00471b73475c9552a4b661eca64c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1000-8578
1000-8578
language zho
last_indexed 2024-12-10T23:59:17Z
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher Magazine House of Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment
record_format Article
series Zhongliu Fangzhi Yanjiu
spelling doaj.art-8d6d00471b73475c9552a4b661eca64c2022-12-22T01:28:31ZzhoMagazine House of Cancer Research on Prevention and TreatmentZhongliu Fangzhi Yanjiu1000-85781000-85782018-07-0145748849110.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2018.17.13828578.2018.17.1382Influence of Periprostatic Adiposity Measurement Parameters on Preoperative Staging and Grading of Prostate CancerZHANG Qiang0SUN Lijiang1ZHANG Guiming2QI Jun3YANG Zhigang4Department of Urology, Baotou Central Hospital, Baotou 014040, ChinaDepartment of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, ChinaDepartment of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, ChinaDepartmentof Urology, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medcine, Shanghai 200092, ChinaDepartment of Urology, Baotou Central Hospital, Baotou 014040, ChinaObjective To analyze the influence of periprostatic fat on the difference of staging/grading before and after radical retropubic prostatectomy(RRP). Methods A total of 184 patients who underwent RRP were analyzed retrospectively. The different fat measurements were performed on the slices of MRI and compared with the clinical and pathologic factors using SPSS13.0. Results The PFA and Ratio showed a significant difference between the difference group and the no difference one in clinical stage before operation and pathologic stage after operation (P=0.014, P=0.037). A statistical association was revealed between the PFA/Ratio and the difference of grading in pre-/post-RRP (P=0.031, P=0.002). In terms of Gleason score, nothing but "PFA" fat measurement was found to be different between two groups (P=0.017); Logistic regression analysis revealed a statistical association between the PFA/T-zone volume and the difference of grading in pre-/post-RRP (P=0.018, P=0.028). Conclusion The periprostatic adipose has effect on accurate evaluation of preoperative staging and grading of PCa.http://html.rhhz.net/ZLFZYJ/html/8578.2018.17.1382.htmprostate cancerstaginggleason scoreperiprostatic adiposity
spellingShingle ZHANG Qiang
SUN Lijiang
ZHANG Guiming
QI Jun
YANG Zhigang
Influence of Periprostatic Adiposity Measurement Parameters on Preoperative Staging and Grading of Prostate Cancer
Zhongliu Fangzhi Yanjiu
prostate cancer
staging
gleason score
periprostatic adiposity
title Influence of Periprostatic Adiposity Measurement Parameters on Preoperative Staging and Grading of Prostate Cancer
title_full Influence of Periprostatic Adiposity Measurement Parameters on Preoperative Staging and Grading of Prostate Cancer
title_fullStr Influence of Periprostatic Adiposity Measurement Parameters on Preoperative Staging and Grading of Prostate Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Periprostatic Adiposity Measurement Parameters on Preoperative Staging and Grading of Prostate Cancer
title_short Influence of Periprostatic Adiposity Measurement Parameters on Preoperative Staging and Grading of Prostate Cancer
title_sort influence of periprostatic adiposity measurement parameters on preoperative staging and grading of prostate cancer
topic prostate cancer
staging
gleason score
periprostatic adiposity
url http://html.rhhz.net/ZLFZYJ/html/8578.2018.17.1382.htm
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangqiang influenceofperiprostaticadipositymeasurementparametersonpreoperativestagingandgradingofprostatecancer
AT sunlijiang influenceofperiprostaticadipositymeasurementparametersonpreoperativestagingandgradingofprostatecancer
AT zhangguiming influenceofperiprostaticadipositymeasurementparametersonpreoperativestagingandgradingofprostatecancer
AT qijun influenceofperiprostaticadipositymeasurementparametersonpreoperativestagingandgradingofprostatecancer
AT yangzhigang influenceofperiprostaticadipositymeasurementparametersonpreoperativestagingandgradingofprostatecancer