Hyaluronic acid treatment versus standard of care in chronic wounds in a German setting: Cost‐effectiveness analysis

Abstract Background and Aims Chronic wounds are a major burden for worldwide health care systems. In the management of chronic wounds several strategies with innovative and active agents emerged in the past few years, such as hyaluronic acid containing wound dressings. Evidence comparing the cost‐ef...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dominik Blunck, Prof. Dr. Oliver Schöffski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-01-01
Series:Health Science Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.969
_version_ 1797737791139872768
author Dominik Blunck
Prof. Dr. Oliver Schöffski
author_facet Dominik Blunck
Prof. Dr. Oliver Schöffski
author_sort Dominik Blunck
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background and Aims Chronic wounds are a major burden for worldwide health care systems. In the management of chronic wounds several strategies with innovative and active agents emerged in the past few years, such as hyaluronic acid containing wound dressings. Evidence comparing the cost‐effectiveness of hyaluronan and standard of care dressings (hydrofiber with silver) is still missing. The aim of the study is thus, to assess the cost‐effectiveness of hyaluronan versus standard of care dressings (hydrofiber with silver) in chronic wounds from a German statutory health insurance perspective. Methods A decision tree was modeled to quantify the cost and healing rate at 12 weeks for the hyaluronan and silver dressings strategies. Input parameters were collected literature‐based, accounting for healing rates, dressing prices and prices for dressing changes and associated home care. Parameter uncertainty was accounted for by one‐way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Results Hyaluronic acid showed a better healing rate (60.68%) and noticeable lower cost (749.80 Euro) compared to standard of care (silver containing) dressings (59.62%; 883.05 Euro), resulting in an Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio of −12,570.57. The hyaluronan approach is hence a dominant strategy in chronic wound management. Sensitivity analysis confirmed these results, giving a range of 60%– 70% of cost‐effective scenarios. Conclusions Hyaluronic acid dressings showed to be a clinical more effective strategy at significantly lower cost in chronic wounds compared to standard of care (hydrofiber with silver).
first_indexed 2024-03-12T13:33:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8d6fe5096a864d1bb7a173ea5a585bf5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2398-8835
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T13:33:26Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Health Science Reports
spelling doaj.art-8d6fe5096a864d1bb7a173ea5a585bf52023-08-24T06:32:46ZengWileyHealth Science Reports2398-88352023-01-0161n/an/a10.1002/hsr2.969Hyaluronic acid treatment versus standard of care in chronic wounds in a German setting: Cost‐effectiveness analysisDominik Blunck0Prof. Dr. Oliver Schöffski1Department of Health Management, Institute of Management Friedrich‐Alexander‐Universität Erlangen‐Nürnberg (FAU) Nuremberg GermanyDepartment of Health Management, Institute of Management Friedrich‐Alexander‐Universität Erlangen‐Nürnberg (FAU) Nuremberg GermanyAbstract Background and Aims Chronic wounds are a major burden for worldwide health care systems. In the management of chronic wounds several strategies with innovative and active agents emerged in the past few years, such as hyaluronic acid containing wound dressings. Evidence comparing the cost‐effectiveness of hyaluronan and standard of care dressings (hydrofiber with silver) is still missing. The aim of the study is thus, to assess the cost‐effectiveness of hyaluronan versus standard of care dressings (hydrofiber with silver) in chronic wounds from a German statutory health insurance perspective. Methods A decision tree was modeled to quantify the cost and healing rate at 12 weeks for the hyaluronan and silver dressings strategies. Input parameters were collected literature‐based, accounting for healing rates, dressing prices and prices for dressing changes and associated home care. Parameter uncertainty was accounted for by one‐way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Results Hyaluronic acid showed a better healing rate (60.68%) and noticeable lower cost (749.80 Euro) compared to standard of care (silver containing) dressings (59.62%; 883.05 Euro), resulting in an Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio of −12,570.57. The hyaluronan approach is hence a dominant strategy in chronic wound management. Sensitivity analysis confirmed these results, giving a range of 60%– 70% of cost‐effective scenarios. Conclusions Hyaluronic acid dressings showed to be a clinical more effective strategy at significantly lower cost in chronic wounds compared to standard of care (hydrofiber with silver).https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.969chronic woundscost‐effectiveness analysisdressingshyaluronic acidsilver
spellingShingle Dominik Blunck
Prof. Dr. Oliver Schöffski
Hyaluronic acid treatment versus standard of care in chronic wounds in a German setting: Cost‐effectiveness analysis
Health Science Reports
chronic wounds
cost‐effectiveness analysis
dressings
hyaluronic acid
silver
title Hyaluronic acid treatment versus standard of care in chronic wounds in a German setting: Cost‐effectiveness analysis
title_full Hyaluronic acid treatment versus standard of care in chronic wounds in a German setting: Cost‐effectiveness analysis
title_fullStr Hyaluronic acid treatment versus standard of care in chronic wounds in a German setting: Cost‐effectiveness analysis
title_full_unstemmed Hyaluronic acid treatment versus standard of care in chronic wounds in a German setting: Cost‐effectiveness analysis
title_short Hyaluronic acid treatment versus standard of care in chronic wounds in a German setting: Cost‐effectiveness analysis
title_sort hyaluronic acid treatment versus standard of care in chronic wounds in a german setting cost effectiveness analysis
topic chronic wounds
cost‐effectiveness analysis
dressings
hyaluronic acid
silver
url https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.969
work_keys_str_mv AT dominikblunck hyaluronicacidtreatmentversusstandardofcareinchronicwoundsinagermansettingcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT profdroliverschoffski hyaluronicacidtreatmentversusstandardofcareinchronicwoundsinagermansettingcosteffectivenessanalysis