Are the marginal convergence outcomes of the Cohesion Policy diminishing?

Significant disparities still exist between regions of the European Union, even though substantial Cohesion investments are directed to address this issue. To adjust the Cohesion Policy (CP), researchers assess the returns of the CP, but almost all studies are carried out at NUTS1&2 or a country...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mindaugas Butkus, Alma Mačiulytė-Šniukienė, Kristina Matuzevičiūtė
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vilnius Gediminas Technical University 2020-08-01
Series:Journal of Business Economics and Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/JBEM/article/view/13170
_version_ 1818905592137252864
author Mindaugas Butkus
Alma Mačiulytė-Šniukienė
Kristina Matuzevičiūtė
author_facet Mindaugas Butkus
Alma Mačiulytė-Šniukienė
Kristina Matuzevičiūtė
author_sort Mindaugas Butkus
collection DOAJ
description Significant disparities still exist between regions of the European Union, even though substantial Cohesion investments are directed to address this issue. To adjust the Cohesion Policy (CP), researchers assess the returns of the CP, but almost all studies are carried out at NUTS1&2 or a country level, even though significant disparities occur at NUTS3 level. Moreover, just a few studies examine the non-linear effects of the CP, and none of them covers the NUTS3 disaggregation level. Filling the gap of previous contributions, the paper aims to investigate convergence outcomes of the CP at NUTS2&3 level and to identify whether the marginal effect of the CP is diminishing. The estimation strategy is based on the modified specification of the difference-in-differences estimator that has an advantage while examining policy effects, using non-experimental data. Based on research findings, the essential guidelines for the improvement of the CP can be drawn up: i) the distribution policy of Cohesion investments should focus on smaller territorial units to reduce disparities at NUTS3 level; ii) the intensity of the CP’s transfers has to be optimised because excessive intensity does not provide a positive return.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T21:25:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8d71a6f0755c4247a4d063143208ff81
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1611-1699
2029-4433
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T21:25:47Z
publishDate 2020-08-01
publisher Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
record_format Article
series Journal of Business Economics and Management
spelling doaj.art-8d71a6f0755c4247a4d063143208ff812022-12-21T20:05:08ZengVilnius Gediminas Technical UniversityJournal of Business Economics and Management1611-16992029-44332020-08-012151390141010.3846/jbem.2020.1317013170Are the marginal convergence outcomes of the Cohesion Policy diminishing?Mindaugas Butkus0Alma Mačiulytė-Šniukienė1Kristina Matuzevičiūtė2Department of Economics Engineering Faculty of Business Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius, LithuaniaDepartment of Business Technology and Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Business Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius, LithuaniaDepartment of Economics Engineering Faculty of Business Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius, LithuaniaSignificant disparities still exist between regions of the European Union, even though substantial Cohesion investments are directed to address this issue. To adjust the Cohesion Policy (CP), researchers assess the returns of the CP, but almost all studies are carried out at NUTS1&2 or a country level, even though significant disparities occur at NUTS3 level. Moreover, just a few studies examine the non-linear effects of the CP, and none of them covers the NUTS3 disaggregation level. Filling the gap of previous contributions, the paper aims to investigate convergence outcomes of the CP at NUTS2&3 level and to identify whether the marginal effect of the CP is diminishing. The estimation strategy is based on the modified specification of the difference-in-differences estimator that has an advantage while examining policy effects, using non-experimental data. Based on research findings, the essential guidelines for the improvement of the CP can be drawn up: i) the distribution policy of Cohesion investments should focus on smaller territorial units to reduce disparities at NUTS3 level; ii) the intensity of the CP’s transfers has to be optimised because excessive intensity does not provide a positive return.https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/JBEM/article/view/13170cohesion policycohesion investmentsregional disparitiesconvergencediminishing returnnuts2nuts3
spellingShingle Mindaugas Butkus
Alma Mačiulytė-Šniukienė
Kristina Matuzevičiūtė
Are the marginal convergence outcomes of the Cohesion Policy diminishing?
Journal of Business Economics and Management
cohesion policy
cohesion investments
regional disparities
convergence
diminishing return
nuts2
nuts3
title Are the marginal convergence outcomes of the Cohesion Policy diminishing?
title_full Are the marginal convergence outcomes of the Cohesion Policy diminishing?
title_fullStr Are the marginal convergence outcomes of the Cohesion Policy diminishing?
title_full_unstemmed Are the marginal convergence outcomes of the Cohesion Policy diminishing?
title_short Are the marginal convergence outcomes of the Cohesion Policy diminishing?
title_sort are the marginal convergence outcomes of the cohesion policy diminishing
topic cohesion policy
cohesion investments
regional disparities
convergence
diminishing return
nuts2
nuts3
url https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/JBEM/article/view/13170
work_keys_str_mv AT mindaugasbutkus arethemarginalconvergenceoutcomesofthecohesionpolicydiminishing
AT almamaciulytesniukiene arethemarginalconvergenceoutcomesofthecohesionpolicydiminishing
AT kristinamatuzeviciute arethemarginalconvergenceoutcomesofthecohesionpolicydiminishing