Early Adaptations to a Two-Week Uphill Run Sprint Interval Training and Cycle Sprint Interval Training

This study sought to compare early physiological and performance adaptations between a two-week cycle sprint interval training (SIT) and uphill run sprint training (UST) programs. Seventeen recreationally active adult males (age = 28 ± 5 years; body mass (BM) = 78 ± 9 kg) were...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mykolas Kavaliauskas, John Jakeman, John Babraj
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-07-01
Series:Sports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/6/3/72
_version_ 1798003431881834496
author Mykolas Kavaliauskas
John Jakeman
John Babraj
author_facet Mykolas Kavaliauskas
John Jakeman
John Babraj
author_sort Mykolas Kavaliauskas
collection DOAJ
description This study sought to compare early physiological and performance adaptations between a two-week cycle sprint interval training (SIT) and uphill run sprint training (UST) programs. Seventeen recreationally active adult males (age = 28 ± 5 years; body mass (BM) = 78 ± 9 kg) were assigned to either a control (n = 5), SIT (n = 6), or UST (n = 6) group. A discrete group of participants (n = 6, age = 33 ± 6 years, and body mass = 80 ± 9 kg) completed both training protocols to determine acute physiological responses. Intervention groups completed either a run or cycle peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) test (intervention type dependent) prior to and following two weeks of training. Training comprised of three sessions per week of 4 × 30-s “all-out” sprints with a four-minute active recovery between bouts on a cycle ergometer against 7.5% of body mass in the SIT group and on a 10% slope in the UST group. The VO2peak values remained unchanged in both training groups, but time-to-exhaustion (TTE) was significantly increased only in the UST group (pre—495 ± 40 s, post—551 ± 15 s; p = 0.014) and not in the SIT group (pre—613 ± 130 s, post—634 ± 118 s, p = 0.07). Ventilatory threshold (VT) was significantly increased in both training groups (SIT group: pre—1.94 ± 0.45 L·min−1, post—2.23 ± 0.42 L·min−1; p < 0.005, UST group: pre—2.04 ± 0.40 L·min−1, post—2.33 ± 0.34 L·min−1, p < 0.005). These results indicate that UST may be an effective alternative to SIT in healthy individuals.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T12:07:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8d73dfff825b46748397e203e96ecc69
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4663
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T12:07:42Z
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sports
spelling doaj.art-8d73dfff825b46748397e203e96ecc692022-12-22T04:24:41ZengMDPI AGSports2075-46632018-07-01637210.3390/sports6030072sports6030072Early Adaptations to a Two-Week Uphill Run Sprint Interval Training and Cycle Sprint Interval TrainingMykolas Kavaliauskas0John Jakeman1John Babraj2School of Applied Sciences, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh EH11 4BN, UKDepartment of Sport, Health Sciences and Social Work, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford OX3 0BP, UKDivision of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Abertay University, Dundee DD1 1HG, UKThis study sought to compare early physiological and performance adaptations between a two-week cycle sprint interval training (SIT) and uphill run sprint training (UST) programs. Seventeen recreationally active adult males (age = 28 ± 5 years; body mass (BM) = 78 ± 9 kg) were assigned to either a control (n = 5), SIT (n = 6), or UST (n = 6) group. A discrete group of participants (n = 6, age = 33 ± 6 years, and body mass = 80 ± 9 kg) completed both training protocols to determine acute physiological responses. Intervention groups completed either a run or cycle peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) test (intervention type dependent) prior to and following two weeks of training. Training comprised of three sessions per week of 4 × 30-s “all-out” sprints with a four-minute active recovery between bouts on a cycle ergometer against 7.5% of body mass in the SIT group and on a 10% slope in the UST group. The VO2peak values remained unchanged in both training groups, but time-to-exhaustion (TTE) was significantly increased only in the UST group (pre—495 ± 40 s, post—551 ± 15 s; p = 0.014) and not in the SIT group (pre—613 ± 130 s, post—634 ± 118 s, p = 0.07). Ventilatory threshold (VT) was significantly increased in both training groups (SIT group: pre—1.94 ± 0.45 L·min−1, post—2.23 ± 0.42 L·min−1; p < 0.005, UST group: pre—2.04 ± 0.40 L·min−1, post—2.33 ± 0.34 L·min−1, p < 0.005). These results indicate that UST may be an effective alternative to SIT in healthy individuals.http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/6/3/72high-intensity interval trainingtraining adaptationslactateventilator threshold
spellingShingle Mykolas Kavaliauskas
John Jakeman
John Babraj
Early Adaptations to a Two-Week Uphill Run Sprint Interval Training and Cycle Sprint Interval Training
Sports
high-intensity interval training
training adaptations
lactate
ventilator threshold
title Early Adaptations to a Two-Week Uphill Run Sprint Interval Training and Cycle Sprint Interval Training
title_full Early Adaptations to a Two-Week Uphill Run Sprint Interval Training and Cycle Sprint Interval Training
title_fullStr Early Adaptations to a Two-Week Uphill Run Sprint Interval Training and Cycle Sprint Interval Training
title_full_unstemmed Early Adaptations to a Two-Week Uphill Run Sprint Interval Training and Cycle Sprint Interval Training
title_short Early Adaptations to a Two-Week Uphill Run Sprint Interval Training and Cycle Sprint Interval Training
title_sort early adaptations to a two week uphill run sprint interval training and cycle sprint interval training
topic high-intensity interval training
training adaptations
lactate
ventilator threshold
url http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/6/3/72
work_keys_str_mv AT mykolaskavaliauskas earlyadaptationstoatwoweekuphillrunsprintintervaltrainingandcyclesprintintervaltraining
AT johnjakeman earlyadaptationstoatwoweekuphillrunsprintintervaltrainingandcyclesprintintervaltraining
AT johnbabraj earlyadaptationstoatwoweekuphillrunsprintintervaltrainingandcyclesprintintervaltraining